Originally posted by Icerage:wow, politics is more important than the defense of singapore
They say war is a result of bad foreign policies. So it might be easier to start one from political field.
seriously, e more SAF generals they field, the more SAF gets into e press for e wrong reasons
Originally posted by sbst275:seriously, e more SAF generals they field, the more SAF gets into e press for e wrong reasons
So they quickly throw in a picture of a maid carrying the fullpack of the soldier to divert attention away?
Originally posted by likeyou:Doesnt matter whether he is general or not.
What matter most is whether he can serve the pple and understand the pple or not.
that is also what gaddefi telling libya ppl.
i might be a colonel but i love libyians i fight you because i love you. " 打是疼骂是爱阿”。
Originally posted by charlize:So they quickly throw in a picture of a maid carrying the fullpack of the soldier to divert attention away?
Quite effective I'd say.
Originally posted by Nelstar:Quite effective I'd say.
Originally posted by Clivebenss:Is SAF training generals for the country or MIW?
These pple when awardeded their scholarships already earmarked for MIW
It's rather his career in the SAF is training (and padding of CV) for MIW
I read in other forums:
Any general entering politics through the GRC back door route is almost like the soldier getting his maid to carry his fullpack - both needing to depend on others.
Quite an interesting analogy.
in e past, SAF generals dun step into politics until TCH.
In fact prior to TCH's, most of e senior officers are rather posted to manage co like SBS
Originally posted by sbst275:in e past, SAF generals dun step into politics until TCH.
In fact prior to TCH's, most of e senior officers are rather posted to manage co like SBS
Do you think ex generals have the capability and experience to helm stat boards and GLCs?