Will u Vote for PAP or Opp?
-
Originally posted by Nelstar:
Ok, keyboard warrior.
You seemed to know me so well. What a fantastic understanding you have.
Yes, you are the best, drawing the conclusions from just simple apolitical statements. Fantastic. Wonderful. You jumped the gun. You the best keyboard warrior.
Just because people have different views, they must be MIW supporter. It reflects how intelligent our keyboard warrior here is.
Fantastic.
Fantastic? That's hardly an impossible feat.
As a matter of fact, I'm truly amazed by folks who are less intelligent than you.
That would take some beating.If you would assume less (and making fewer errors for a start), you may just be better able to explain if you'd rather vote for the guy who pissed on you but represented your interests better or the ordinary guy who doesn't represent your interests as well. For all the high falutin you've been on, this fundamental question has still not been answered for a simple-minded drone who advocates objectivity.
So, really, what are you voting for - a playmate?
-
Originally posted by the Bear:
whatever you guys say, the bottom line at my constituency is that both sides are douchebags...
i'm still trying to figure out which side i hate less
LOL.
Why not give someone new a chance? Listen to them, I bet you might find them more appreciative of the hardships.
You always have time till the 7th. I rather spoil my vote than to vote for some people who keep increasing their own pay. Of course, that's my choice.
-
Originally posted by walesa:
Fantastic? That's hardly an impossible feat.
As a matter of fact, I'm truly amazed by folks who are less intelligent than you.
That would take some beating.If you would assume less (and making fewer errors for a start), you may just be better able to explain if you'd rather vote for the guy who pissed on you but represented your interests better or the ordinary guy who doesn't represent your interests as well. For all the high falutin you've been on, this fundamental question has still not been answered for a simple-minded drone who advocates objectivity.
So, really, what are you voting for - a playmate?
Right. You know everything.
-
Originally posted by Nelstar:
Right. You know everything.
I certainly understand "objectivity" better than you can ever hope for. Can a simple-minded drone say the same?
-
Originally posted by walesa:
I certainly understand "objectivity" better than you can ever hope for. Can you say the same, simple-minded drone?
Right. You understand. Right.
-
Originally posted by Nelstar:
Right. You understand. Right.
Sure I understand better than you. -
Originally posted by walesa:
Sure I understand better than you.Ok. Understand.
-
Originally posted by Nelstar:
Ok. Understand.
Just as well you do. Men were never born equal. -
Originally posted by walesa:
Just as well you do. Men were never born equal.Four legs good. Two legs bad.
"oops my bad"
-
Originally posted by Nelstar:
Four legs good. Two legs bad.
"oops my bad"
Indeed. -
Originally posted by Bhw33:
fymk and 4SG,
It really makes me very troubled to hear that a mediocre white ang mo man can stroll into S'pore by getting a simple admin job which eventually leads to him gaining a S'pore citizenship in just a few months.
It is just so unfair to locals who had to struggle under the stringest education system and the local men who had to perform NS.
Does it mean that utterly educated locals who scored fulls As in 'O' and 'A' levels and go thru the extreme pressure cooker of NUS cannot even fill simple executive posts?
Of course local talent can fill these easy posts.
Relying on angmo foreign talent makes no logic.
That is why I always say that we are 2nd class citizens in our country and it is better we give up S'pore citizensip and then come back to S'pore as foreign talent.
I just took SM Goh's advice - Think out of the box. Then again I also took MIW's advice -foreign talent good . So I thought out of the box and became a foreign talent elsewhere...but SM Goh had to label my type a 'quitter'. So I wonder why is Singapore taking in 'quitters' from foreign lands? -
Vote none, none is reliable.
-
Originally posted by fymk:
I just took SM Goh's advice - Think out of the box. Then again I also took MIW's advice -foreign talent good . So I thought out of the box and became a foreign talent elsewhere...but SM Goh had to label my type a 'quitter'. So I wonder why is Singapore taking in 'quitters' from foreign lands?You are not a quitter if you support them. (See examples of new party candidates who were originally from other countries but only became Sg citizens a few years back)
If you don't support them, you will be labelled everything bad under the sun. (See examples of opposition party members who are Singaporeans, did their NS, worked overseas as FTs, have impressive credentials, don't stomp their feet or are speechless when interviewed by the media)
-
in times like this, take sides....being neutral is totally unfit
-
Originally posted by Fcukpap:
in times like this, take sides....being neutral is totally unfit
Agreed, since there are so many people taking the opposing side, I'll take the incumbent's side.
-
aiyah, see where got charbor nice one vote lah. glenda hansumay, nicoleseah all swee charbor vote lah
-
perhaps this shows that most of them have matured from timid selves...the first great milestone of sg politics
-
Originally posted by charlize:
You are not a quitter if you support them. (See examples of new party candidates who were originally from other countries but only became Sg citizens a few years back)
If you don't support them, you will be labelled everything bad under the sun. (See examples of opposition party members who are Singaporeans, did their NS, worked overseas as FTs, have impressive credentials, don't stomp their feet or are speechless when interviewed by the media)
My PAPa say I am a quitter....I guess he was quite correct
-
Originally posted by Fcukpap:
perhaps this shows that most of them have matured from timid selves...the first great milestone of sg politics
You should be concerned about those who try to make a case for objective reasoning, yet fail to reconcile the logic behind their points. You need look no further than those who subscribe to the need for the opposition to be able to enact their mandates (notwithstanding the fact these very folks are not actually in a position to form a government even if they won every seat constested) to justify a vote for them, rather than accept the fact that the opposition - at best - could serve no other purpose but an effective check on the regime.When you've enough of such folks around, that's when your destiny gets sealed for you. Just look at those who think with their hind legs...
-
I will vote for the party that won' sell out singaporeans.
-
I look forward to higher GST, ERP, COE and other ways to squeeze Singaporeans.
-
Originally posted by charlize:
I look forward to higher GST, ERP, COE and other ways to squeeze Singaporeans.
Dont worry, after ge, a few of the ministers who know how to earn pple's money will come up many final decisions that will suck out the money from the people. They say listen to feedback..my foot! Feed the chicken backside.
-
Originally posted by likeyou:
Dont worry, after ge, a few of the ministers who know how to earn pple's money will come up many final decisions that will suck out the money from the people. They say listen to feedback..my foot! Feed the chicken backside.
So much angst.
-
Originally posted by charlize:
So much angst.
With the grow and share being cash in yesterday..lots of pple have extra pocket money...they are thinking how to spend and not thinking how to vote wisely. They are happy to rec the money, mind already floated to pap....and waiting for the next batch of cash pay out...wow ..everybody happy now....pap gain advantage. -
if oppostion become government. they give you double what u having now. U think u will vote for them. Somemore this is Ah gong siao.