‘PAP stands to lose more from electoral boundary changes’
-
http://sg.yfittopostblog.com/2010/08/26/pap-stands-more-to-lose-from-electoral-boundary-changes/
Member of Parliament (MP) for Tanjong Pagar GRC, Mr Baey Yam Keng says the ruling People’s Action Party stands to lose more from any changes to electoral boundaries ahead of the next General Election.
Mr Baey, who is also the deputy managing director of public relations firm, Hill and Knowlton (Singapore), was referring to the policy of revising electoral boundaries before the country goes to the polls on Nomination Day.
Comments by Foreign Minister George Yeo last month hinted that the next General Elections could be held “by the end of this year”.
Singapore is currently divided into 24 electoral divisions, comprising 15 Group Representation Constituencies (GRCs), and nine Single Member Constituencies (SMCs) but the government announced earlier this year that more changes can be expected ahead.
In the past, local opposition parties have also claimed the boundary review report is released without giving them sufficient time to formulate their campaign strategy.
In the 2001 General Elections, the revised boundaries were released about one week before Nomination Day. In 2006, they were announced about 7 weeks before.
But the 39-year-old Baey was quick to dismiss the timing and policy of the boundary report and that any changes would hand the ruling party an unfair advantage.
“Boundary changes are inevitable in every election in any country and with more SMCs and smaller GRCs, there will be more changes to boundaries this time,” he said.
“But if you look at the incumbent MPs, most are PAP MPs, so actually the PAP might have more to lose,” he explained.
Mr Baey, who is married with three kids aged 6 between 10, also said that if the boundary changes are seen to be really unfavourable to certain parties, the voters can make their voices heard.
He said, “I think voters will see it and they will use their votes to express their unhappiness if they feel it’s unfair.”
Turning his attention to the introduction of the “cooling off day” — a 24-hour period before polling day in which no political parties can campaign or hold rally speeches – he said it would allow voters to think through their decision carefully before going to the ballot box.
“As a voter, I will welcome that because it allows me more time to think through, to cast a vote that is based on more rational thinking,” he said.
Hear Mr Baey’s thoughts on the electoral boundary changes as well as the upcoming General Elections.
-
We don't have unhappy voters in Singapore.
Really.
-
soon they'll abolish GRCs.
and say... "you only need to vote which party represent your...... CDC." -
But the 39-year-old Baey was quick to dismiss the timing and policy of the boundary report and that any changes would hand the ruling party an unfair advantage.
“Boundary changes are inevitable in every election in any country and with more SMCs and smaller GRCs, there will be more changes to boundaries this time,” he said.
“But if you look at the incumbent MPs, most are PAP MPs, so actually the PAP might have more to lose,” he explained.
This Baey doesn't know what he is talk about... May be he should visit the casino to have a look. The House always win!
-
You have yet to draw/show out the boundary and start to claim that PAP might have more to lose??? What f...........is he talking about? And when did singaporeans make their voice heard, in every govt seminar or dialogues I attended, Singaporeans all diam diam one...make their vote noted would had been more precise. Aiyo
-
Most Singaporeans dun care abt election fairness.
If most singaporeans care abt election fairness PAP will be overthrown by now.
Most Singaporean care abt money and economic progress only. Thats y PAP stay in power.
-
Yes, most singaporeans care abt money and individual progress in economic, but who nurtured them to behave this way, who bring about and instill such thinking on each and every individual singaporeans, and who created a society that make peoples think that way. You have to look at many views before you really appreciate why people behave that way. Read more on human behavorial science ya. LKY is a master of it
-
I asked my relatives is GRC fair?
Our redrawing of election boundary /zones done not by indepedent department.
Is it fair? All said not fair lah.
Then in the end many still vote PAP.
-
Originally posted by angel7030:
Yes, most singaporeans care abt money and individual progress in economic, but who nurtured them to behave this way, who bring about and instill such thinking on each and every individual singaporeans, and who created a society that make peoples think that way. You have to look at many views before you really appreciate why people behave that way. Read more on human behavorial science ya. LKY is a master of it
I see. -
again behavorial science apply, PAP is a buzz words here, during election, full of banners, at the voting centre, all Govt civil servant with lots of PAP logo..what u expect, tick PAP lah.
-
Originally posted by angel7030:
again behavorial science apply, PAP is a buzz words here, during election, full of banners, at the voting centre, all Govt civil servant with lots of PAP logo..what u expect, tick PAP lah.
Yes, all go tick PAP. All becomes spoilt votes. -
Originally posted by -StarDust-:
I asked my relatives is GRC fair?
Our redrawing of election boundary /zones done not by indepedent department.
Is it fair? All said not fair lah.
Then in the end many still vote PAP.
Didn't they realise something?
This is what always happens: 1. Say not fair but still vote PAP > 2. Unfair election result > 3. Unfair opposition representation in parliament > 4. PAP implements unfair policies > 5. People get treated unfairly > 6. People say not fair > Back to point 1.
-
Originally posted by angel7030:
again behavorial science apply, PAP is a buzz words here, during election, full of banners, at the voting centre, all Govt civil servant with lots of PAP logo..what u expect, tick PAP lah.
you have ticks.