Am I the only one who thinks 46 is pretty much useless after Tampines...
Are you saying that 291 should have been extended instead?
Originally posted by SMB128B:Am I the only one who thinks 46 is pretty much useless after Tampines...
It is in fact useless from Tampines Interchange to st 83.
Today svc 46 SD i saw like only 11 pax the most..
Originally posted by SMB1368T:Are you saying that 291 should have been extended instead?
I am saying there isnt even a need for such a route in the first place.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:It is in fact useless from Tampines Interchange to st 83.
So essentially the whole svc is redundant! Typical of short BSEP trunks.
I mean like when you could have just amend 291 to fulfil the purpose of 46 instead
wait for time to tell... this morning i took SG5551G 46, had around 20+ ppl heading from tampines to fengshan market...
Originally posted by SBS6853S:wait for time to tell... this morning i took SG5551G 46, had around 20+ ppl heading from tampines to fengshan market...
Slowly la..
if a short trunk can have 20+ ppl on the 3rd day its alr good enough...
Originally posted by SMB1368T:I mean like when you could have just amend 291 to fulfil the purpose of 46 instead
Anyway they are trying the best to scrap 222P, 291P, 293P. A number that had the wasted effort.
Originally posted by SBS6853S:wait for time to tell... this morning i took SG5551G 46, had around 20+ ppl heading from tampines to fengshan market...
Huh? Where sia. Details pls?
Originally posted by SMB128B:Huh? Where sia. Details pls?
got some 20+ old ppl seen onboard the bus in the morning from tampines ave 3/st 83 to fengshan market. aft blk 85 the loading died down
3Q/4Q any inkling of new services to be introdueced? Apart from 68
Originally posted by SBS6465E:3Q/4Q any inkling of new services to be introdueced? Apart from 68
Sembawang-Canberra feeder
Diversion of 117 through Canberra estate to connect Canberra town to Yishun
Breaking into 2 of another service(?)
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Sembawang-Canberra feeder
Diversion of 117 through Canberra estate to connect Canberra town to Yishun
Breaking into 2 of another service(?)
Sembawang feeder?Use 89x?
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Sembawang-Canberra feeder
Diversion of 117 through Canberra estate to connect Canberra town to Yishun
Breaking into 2 of another service(?)
Woah... So fast split trunks alr?
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Sembawang-Canberra feeder
Diversion of 117 through Canberra estate to connect Canberra town to Yishun
Breaking into 2 of another service(?)
3rd part:
We regret that service 67 will receive a change:
Tampines -> Choa Chu Kang via Eng Neo Avenue, PIE, BKE & Bukit Panjang Road
We regret that service 61 will receive a change:
Eunos -> Jurong East, and the section will be replaced by service 861 (running from Bukit Batok to New Bridge Road).
Originally posted by TPS Timothy Mok:3rd part:
We regret that service 67 will receive a change:
Tampines -> Choa Chu Kang via Eng Neo Avenue, PIE, BKE & Bukit Panjang Road
We regret that service 61 will receive a change:
Eunos -> Jurong East, and the section will be replaced by service 861 (running from Bukit Batok to New Bridge Road).
Is this legit? I tot no more new long dist svcs? Unless this one plying express...
Btw, why regret 67 lol
Originally posted by carbikebus:Sembawang feeder?Use 89x?
883.
Originally posted by SMB128B:Is this legit? I tot no more new long dist svcs? Unless this one plying express...
Btw, why regret 67 lol
He is just trolling la
Originally posted by SMB1333T:883.
Isnt that a trunk svc?
Aiya lets just wait lor
Don't forget there is already 825.
83x maybe.
I suspect Canberra feeder will use 88x. It might not be a feeder and could very well be a trunk service looping at Yishun.
Also, heard anything about re-numbering 401, making it a full day service and having it loop at Fort Rd?