New Bus Services Announced by LTA/PTOs (Part 2)
-
Originally posted by SMB145B:
the other one on early closure had it worse
C:\ ...
put wrong poster is bad enough, link to file that is not accessible? Wonderful, come i clap for you.
luai hua jing, did you do this before?
The one doing all those articles on the SMRT website really sleeping...
Anyway, link to file for 975B fixed
For those who lazy download de..
-
Originally posted by dupdup77:
Hi mr smb3163D, yes. However they never count those supplementary services in the official counting of 80 BSEP services ever since yr 2012 the inception of BSEP. Cheers. Thanks.
if you noticed, the 975B poster does not have the BSEP logo, why does the 979M poster have it then??
-
Originally posted by SMB3163D:
The one doing all those articles on the SMRT website really sleeping...
Anyway, link to file for 975B fixed
For those who lazy download de..
okay.
could have loop into Lim Chu Kang Lane 3 & 2.
-
Originally posted by SMB3163D:
if you noticed, the 975B poster does not have the BSEP logo, why does the 979M poster have it then??
979 is under BSEP hence the BSEP logo on 979M.
SMRT does not use M suffix for such modification, instead uses C for Sunday & PH routes (853/C, 925/C, 961/C) or as per "short working trips" or alternative routes (859/A/B, 700/A). These suffix do not appear on EDS at all for the former.
-
Originally posted by SMB3163D:
if you noticed, the 975B poster does not have the BSEP logo, why does the 979M poster have it then??
Hi mr SMB3163D, answer is very simple. When launched initially, 979 is a BSEP service. So the 'M' variant will have it. 975 is not a BSEP service. So 975B will not have the logo. Cheers. Thanks.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9256 X:
Poster is for Svc 979M.. So can take a photo of the poster...
I find it quite fasinating that SMRT is introducing so many suffix services and still "shortage of service captains"... I would suggest that SMRT should outsource the service captains to SBST where they have a larger pool of manpower (like the other time where the drivers boycott the company)
The hard truth and fact is: SMRT has absolutely no right to engineer further excuses for their shortage of bus captains, look at Woodlands TBI (and possibly their other interchanges as well), bus captains including chief and senior ones (!) have been reduced to doing menial tasks such as doing bus surveys at the interchange, directing movement of buses around the interchange and shunting the buses, instead of actually driving or training other drivers.
In other words, they have made the problem worse for themselves.
-
In future 979 can go via Stagmon Ring, Cck Nth 5, Cck Way, Cck Nth 7, Cck Cres, Cck Dr, Cck St 62, Cck Dr and back.
-
Originally posted by TIB868X:
The hard truth and fact is: SMRT has absolutely no right to engineer further excuses for their shortage of bus captains, look at Woodlands TBI (and possibly their other interchanges as well), bus captains including chief and senior ones (!) have been reduced to doing menial tasks such as doing bus surveys at the interchange, directing movement of buses around the interchange and shunting the buses, instead of actually driving or training other drivers.
In other words, they have made the problem worse for themselves.
Yeah, I agree... Thats why so many buses are left sleeping in the depot...
-
Originally posted by TIB868X:
The hard truth and fact is: SMRT has absolutely no right to engineer further excuses for their shortage of bus captains, look at Woodlands TBI (and possibly their other interchanges as well), bus captains including chief and senior ones (!) have been reduced to doing menial tasks such as doing bus surveys at the interchange, directing movement of buses around the interchange and shunting the buses, instead of actually driving or training other drivers.
In other words, they have made the problem worse for themselves.
They rely on new Malaysian and Chinese BCs,Thats why i despise those untouchable attitude from both SBST and SMRT senior BCs..
-
New service 308 from 15 May
CCK Int - Keat Hong Link
CCK Int
CCK Ave 4 (Lot 1)
CCK Drive
CCK Ave 1
CCK Ave 7
CCK Grove
Keat Hong Link (1 new stop)
CCK Ave 1
CCK Drive
CCK Int
-
Suspected fleet: 2/3 A22s
-
Should just use 303 for feeder,308 might he mistaken as Intratown,Lol!!
-
Predict 3 A22 duty AM/PM01 & 02 and probably 1 S01
-
Remember that time I wrote a list of HDB flats that will be completed from Q2 this year to Q4 next year, and said that there will be new bus services in tandem with their completion?
I may be right. :)
This new feeder 308 is obviously going to happen sooner or later, as new HDB flats are completed in Choa Chu Kang. Just like 805 in Yishun.
Up next may be areas like Woodlands, Sembawang, Yishun, Hougang, Punggol...
-
Originally posted by SMB5007J:
New service 308 from 15 May
CCK Int - Keat Hong Link
CCK Int
CCK Ave 4 (Lot 1)
CCK Drive
CCK Ave 1
CCK Ave 7
CCK Grove
Keat Hong Link (1 new stop)
CCK Ave 1
CCK Drive
CCK Int
All, let's keep a close lookout on the bus stop poles around your estate. There should be more to come! Cannot be this only service in May 2016. Cheers. Thanks.
-
I'm so impressed that Cck Int still can tahan sv 308.
-
Originally posted by dupdup77:
All, let's keep a close lookout on the bus stop poles around your estate. There should be more to come! Cannot be this only service in May 2016. Cheers. Thanks.
new svc in Sengkang Int pls -
Originally posted by Sbs6750E:
I’m so impressed that Cck Int still can tahan sv 308.
Hi mr sbs6750E, feeder service. Super direct route. Few buses needed. Should be able to take it or else they will not launch. Cheers. Thanks.
-
Originally posted by Sbs6750E:
new svc in Sengkang Int plsHi mr sbs6750E, think sengkang need wait few more months as sengkang expanded interchange is not ready yet. Cheers. Thanks.
-
should have just number it as 172M just like 979M but with 7-10mins freq
-
Originally posted by dupdup77:
Hi mr sbs6750E, think sengkang need wait few more months as sengkang expanded interchange is not ready yet. Cheers. Thanks.
start from current int. Still can squees 1-2 more svcs. -
Originally posted by Ajen:
should have just number it as 172M just like 979M with 7-10mins freq
Hi mr Ajen, they won't. Route is different. 979M is just temporary. It will be gone and incorporated into 979 later. This is already made known even before 979M is introduced. Cheers. Thanks.
-
Originally posted by Sbs6750E:
start from current int. Still can squees 1-2 more svcs.Hi mr sbs6750E, ok. Did you happen to see any posters? Cheers. Thanks.
-
Originally posted by dupdup77:
Hi mr sbs6750E, ok. Did you happen to see any posters? Cheers. Thanks.
Just now took LRT. My house bus stop don't have. -
Unless they adjust more svc 172 & 985 mealbreaks at BNL and L1 respectively,I forsee more chaos at CCK.