Originally posted by SMB66X:Aiya, just leave it as 962, not important to go in detailed for this deployment one
Yeah anyways bus on 962 again just now
May be you are right. I see difficulty for people at St 51 stop to get inside the bus. I think the overall loading is around 80 pax, while the SD can take up to 70 pax (hardly more than that though the bus manufacturers may say differently). That's why either the service needs improved frequency or 2 DDs in its fleet. When there are so many spare DDs now, SBST can def try.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:May be you are right. I see difficulty for people at St 51 stop to get inside the bus. I think the overall loading is around 80 pax, while the SD can take up to 70 pax (hardly more than that though the bus manufacturers may say differently). That's why either the service needs improved frequency or 2 DDs in its fleet. When there are so many spare DDs now, SBST can def try.
Yeah,agree.SBS Transit should trial DD buses on 101,really DD buses are needed on 101.Furthermore,HGDEP got some spare DD buses.Maybe Dennis Trident on 101,it will be awesome man
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:Yeah,agree.SBS Transit should trial DD buses on 101,really DD buses are needed on 101.Furthermore,HGDEP got some spare DD buses.Maybe Dennis Trident on 101,it will be awesome man
Don forget 101 is WAB
Originally posted by SBS5111G:Don forget 101 is WAB
So? They can deploy wrights. Also, 101 don't need many DDs. So it won't kill to deploy 1 - 2 non-wab DDs.
854 missing 1 bus from WL and AM side. Any possible perm replacement?
Originally posted by SBS 6078 M:Could be SBS3281L case that time. It was at tamp Int after cameoing on 72 and a B1 Wright of Sv10 brokedown and 3281L was the replacement...
Maybe this is emergency pullover?
I once saw SBS9268L on 132 before when it was still BNDEP 8 but the deployments was still BNDEP that time.
Could it be that after SBS9268L cameod on sv5 and a bus from 132 broke down so it went as a replacement?
SBS9361A
(SLBP SP) (SLBP 252) - replacement for SBS 9202B
Guys, For SMRT deployments if there is a bus park for overnight purposes could you please make it applicable to other bus parks too? I only noticed only WLBP has it. Could anyone please edit the following: YIBP GYBP BBBP CCBP because it makes no sense for WLBP to get it too. Thank you.
Originally posted by TIB783G:Guys, For SMRT deployments if there is a bus park for overnight purposes could you please make it applicable to other bus parks too? I only noticed only WLBP has it. Could anyone please edit the following: YIBP GYBP BBBP CCBP because it makes no sense for WLBP to get it too. Thank you.
Err..... I don't think it's valid. Cause WLBP is different from the aforementioned BPs like YIBP, GYBP, etc...
It's not a interchange nor terminal, it's a proper parking place for those buses to park...
If someone wish to include YBIP GYBP BBBP CCBP all this, kindly include those for SBST as well.
Some good example of ONP for SBST is BSBP(Bishan) AMBP(Ang Mo Kio), though it might take some time.
Originally posted by Yongjunzer:Could it be that after SBS9268L cameod on sv5 and a bus from 132 broke down so it went as a replacement?
How would I know. I can't be at bukit merah and upp thomson rd at the same time, can I?
Plus it was towards bukit merah direction from hougang. Even if it was a breakdown replacement, I'm sure HGDEP/BBDEP/ARBP would have standby-ed a bus at HG Int.
I think for Wlbp better put Wldep/Wlbp cause no matter what they have to refuel and open coin box at Wldep,Unlike Arbp/Brbp they have their own refuel Stn and bus wash.Cgbp also need to put Bndep/Cgbp.
Originally posted by ahjack 77:Actually IMO, currently 101 running on a very regular frequency from SGI towards Buangkok.
Instead of ADD, i suggest more downroute to be make from HCI. perhaps 101A. For ADD, i personally find it unnesscessary though. Loading might not justify when ASD able to take all
maybe can deploy the wrights from 119 to 101 and 113?
Best is if 101 and 113 join tgt from SRG To HG ST 51, ADDs will be put to good use.
If possible SBS926E from 115 can do 101A?
SMB270Y is it still 960 bus? Sometimes it still does 960 from what i see...
SMB349E
[WL SP WL 960].
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:Yeah,agree.SBS Transit should trial DD buses on 101,really DD buses are needed on 101.Furthermore,HGDEP got some spare DD buses.Maybe Dennis Trident on 101,it will be awesome man
if 101, they'll only need to test the looping point if not all the other roads are DD accessible
Originally posted by SMB189A:From sgwiki
SMB190U
(WL 852 > WL TRG)
I only see it on training once...no training equipments onboard...
Originally posted by SMB66X:I only see it on training once...no training equipments onboard...
but already spotted TRG 3 times recently (though only 1 time by u) and missing from 852 for weeks already.
So SP or TRG?
Originally posted by SMB1333T:but already spotted TRG 3 times recently (though only 1 time by u) and missing from 852 for weeks already.
So SP or TRG?
Is there any yellow paper indicating it is a TRG bus?
more importantly, is the revenue equipment removed like SMB288Y and SMB289U...?
Originally posted by TIB783G:Is there any yellow paper indicating it is a TRG bus?
Yes, and the bus is cleaned :o
Originally posted by SMB66X:Yes, and the bus is cleaned :o
Perm TRG for good.
Most importantly, Is there any paper stating that the driver is under instruction?
Originally posted by SMB66X:I only see it on training once...no training equipments onboard...
TIB525K also no trg equipment, but now also become full trg...
Major makeover of SMRT deployments.
Sv167, 961 WLDEP take a few slots.
811, 860 become FULL WLDEP but was edited back to AMDEP.
853 filled with OCs, O405s from AMDEP sent to WL.
Source: Oceane
Originally posted by SBS 6078 M:811, 860 become FULL WLDEP but was edited back to AMDEP.
Source: Oceane
811 and 860 are now definitely WLDEP.