Originally posted by mancha:Just back it up with proof, when call upon to do so. Its only when you can't backup your statement about the person, that you land in deep shit.
If you want to call a person a liar, then you must prove he is a liar. Can't just shout an insult, and call that criticism under freedom of speech.
Maybe Dalforce should engage you as his lawyer for advice.
Originally posted by jmstar~:Maybe Dalforce should engage you as his lawyer for advice.
Not necessarily, he can just post here and I will give it for free.
Originally posted by mancha:Not necessarily, he can just post here and I will give it for free.
Come, prove to us you are a lawyer.
Originally posted by jmstar~:Come, prove to us you are a lawyer.
Ha Ha Ha This is childish.
I am not a lawyer, that why I give advice to the best of my knowledge free.
Originally posted by mancha:Ha Ha Ha This is childish.
I am not a lawyer, that why I give advice to the best of my knowledge free.
Then you should have clarified in the first place, there is nothing to do with childishness.
Be careful to give appropriate advice for your self protection.
I am giving clarification keeping in tandem with the topic.
apa laku?
wa if really is, I would have gotten into trouble eons ago.
you may not agree to the policy fully, but it does not mean it stops you from opening your mouth
In fact many people have open their mouth about policies they don't like and criticise them. Nothing happens because it is just banter and noise only.
Ong Teng Cheong quarreled with the government because of transparency issues. He kept the argument to the issues only. He did not get into trouble with the government.
Move away from making statements about the policies to making statements about the person behind the policies, and you are going into danger.
Yokels like to anyhow shout, Criticise the policies you get sued, which is wrong.
Criticize the govt is a good thing, but you must be able to get the supportive evidence of what you criticise about.
Originally posted by Siliconchip:Lol Ice, why did you remove all of your posts?
Originally posted by mancha:In fact many people have open their mouth about policies they don't like and criticise them. Nothing happens because it is just banter and noise only.
Ong Teng Cheong quarreled with the government because of transparency issues. He kept the argument to the issues only. He did not get into trouble with the government.
Move away from making statements about the policies to making statements about the person behind the policies, and you are going into danger.
Yokels like to anyhow shout, Criticise the policies you get sued, which is wrong.
Sometimes whatever you said as long as it's something reasonable, things do occur sometime later. You wun see it occuring immediately.
Like I mentioned to someone whom I know abt the bus stops that the people in wheelchair can't board (either it's those 5 foot way or those like Novena Square it's very narrow or cramped)...
True enough, recently signages were placed to indicate this bus stop is not wheelchair accessible. No more argument over why no boarding/ alighting.
Originally posted by Alfred Cai:Leaders are human and are normal that they cannot withstand punches in form of statement. Logically, there bound to have many hidden talented people kept mouth shut. Why court trouble for themselves to offer free frank statement for the well beings of all and ended up suffering jail or public criticism. These people also have parents, ancestors, family, relative, friends and circle of enjoyment. Overnight can become worst than….goodness. No heart to continue this flow, so painful to aware of their suffering for yr future.
What rubbish are you uttering?
If some people high up in government makes rubbish remarks, then he or she should be criticised.
no remarks then profile become like ex-presd. So at least talk rubbish sill can get face media.
Originally posted by RemifanSo:What rubbish are you uttering?
What rubbish were you listening? There were movies serials always demonstrated such episodes
Just curious to ask, should the amount won be going into the government coffer or personal coffer as the eventful issue arises because of government policy?
Originally posted by Amitayus48:What rubbish were you listening? There were movies serials always demonstrated such episodes
Just curious to ask, should the amount won be going into the government coffer or personal coffer as the eventful issue arises because of government policy?
What kind of buddhist are you for such an attack?>
Originally posted by Loor:no remarks then profile become like ex-presd. So at least talk rubbish sill can get face media.
most riot start from rubbish, cos within these rubbish, some are accidentally throw away, and it proved to be the selling point in the net, the british riot start from rubbish, a very good example.
got criticism then got improvement. so i don;t feel critics is bad or against the law? only when it becum an accusation then bad.
"We are deaf to critics" Labour chief Lim swee say.
So, what improvement are u toking about, they are deaf leh
why so keen for me to reply? i cannot surf here 24/7 u know. later then i post
Guys,
Eventually I decided to disclose everything here.
I guess if I did not disclose my name and the school I work, I should be quite safe, right?
I am going to tell you that a group of my colleague yelling at me and even claim they are going to kill me. They said "Kill him"(弄æ»ä»–ï¼�æ•´æ»ä»–ï¼�)
And I am going to tell you the story about one MOE Director came to my house alone at night and wanted to have SEX with me. She is a married woman, of couse. I must thank her, she brought alone a bottle of red wine, blue cheese, Grape and 蜂皇精. May be she expected there could be more things come out from my body if I consumed the 蜂皇精.
I am going to tell you about one school princpal having an affair in the school.
I am going to tell you......A LOT OF THINGS HAPPENS IN MY OFFICE.
Stay tune.
Salem2011
Originally posted by angel7030:So, what improvement are u toking about, they are deaf leh
Use sign language. Show em your middle finger.