Originally posted by angel7030:
ya, he also owns the Choon Seng eggs farm
Better than you. At least he's rich.
Eh....Mr Big Shot...you copied your resume of boardrooms from where ? i fall asleep before i finish reading it. I don't give a damn where you have been. Stop flexing your muscles here.
I can give my opinions about this subject here ...freedom of speech..understand , without having to show off who i am.
So get off my back , jackass jerk !
Originally posted by Wiser:Eh....Mr Big Shot...you copied your resume of boardrooms from where ?
My list invoices to clients, of course. Where else would I get such data over the course of ten years?
Originally posted by Wiser:I don't give a damn where you have been.
Can you make up your mind? You asked:
Originally posted by Wiser:
So how many boardrooms you have been in yourself, jackass arse?
and I answered. Now you have a problem with that?
Originally posted by Wiser:
I can give my opinions about this subject here ...freedom of speech..understand , without having to show off who i am.
So get off my back , jackass jerk !
Freedom of speech cuts both ways, dimwit. You can say what you want, and I'm equally free to highlight your lack of reasoning. Do grow up.
Oh, by the way, stop copying me by saying "jackass" all the time. Not that I have any intellectual property claim on the word, you understand, but damn, your lack of vocabulary heaped on top of your lack of originality, in turn heaped on top of your lack of logic, is pathetically irritating.
Mr Had Been, the topic here is the Aussie rejected SGX offer. Where is your rationale of arguement ? Your lack of rationale plus your lack of manner make you the most irritating idiot to discuss anything here.
Go and fly kite.
Fly kite, oh! i love flying kite, so many at ECP, at night, with the neon light, very nice leh.
Kind of getting personal, aint it?
Originally posted by Wiser:Mr Had Been, the topic here is the Aussie rejected SGX offer. Where is your rationale of arguement ? Your lack of rationale plus your lack of manner make you the most irritating idiot to discuss anything here.
Go and fly kite.
Oh, I’m far from being a has-been, booster (by the way, I'll have to educate you - it's "has-been", not "had been", you illiterate cretin). I’ve got a good twenty-odd years ahead of me before I decide if I want to retire early, and plenty of clients wanting to sign 6- or 7-figure contracts each year.
You’re the one who asked about how many boardrooms I’ve been in, and now you say you don’t want to go off topic. Were you lying then, or are you lying now?
If you wanted to focus on ASX/SGX, why did you bring up Liverpool? Were you lying then, or are you lying now?
If you wanted to focus on ASX/SGX, why did you bring up China and all that drooling piffle about boot-licking? Were you lying then, or are you lying now?
Frankly, the way you flip-flop, I’d seriously question if you’re smart enough to know how to fly a kite.
Love your choice of nick, by the way. Oh, hang on – you were being ironic, weren’t you?
Are the posts here an honest reflection of how Singaporeans in general view Australians?
When the treasurer initially announced that he would block the proposed SGX-ASX merger, he said it was a decision made in "the national interest." It was later reported that the main concerns about the proposed merger were around regulatory control and oversight of the clearing and settlement functions currently performed by the ASX. I don't believe that a reasonable regulatory arrangement between Singapore and Australia could not be entered into to address these issues.
Within a political context, the Greens made it clear well before the treasurer announced his decision that they would not support the proposed SGX-ASX merger (n.b., the merger would have also required legislative approval to lift the 15% foreign ownership cap on ASX).
In the current political climate, the Government is reliant on support from Greens and independent MPs in both the lower and upper house. From 1 July (when the newly elected senators take their seats in the upper house), the Greens will exclusively hold balance of power in the upper house and the Government will be reliant on the Greens to ensure passage of their legislative agenda through the upper house.
I don't believe the Greens would have ever supported the SGX-ASG merger, which would have meant the Government would need the support of the Coalition for the proposal to receive legislative approval (and this would have left the Government having run afoul with the Greens, leaving the Greens less included to support the Government's legislative agenda).
While it's true that Labor's courting Greens support (God knows they need it while they're fighting the Carbon Tax battle and the state-government scene is getting decidedly Liberal), Labor themselves are still beholden to the unions and they wouldn't want to risk their power base by backing a move that would be perceived as selling the country, regardless of how well any regulatory arrangements are worked out.
Australians do not like the one party government of Singapore, first of all.
How do you expect two countries to work together , especially when it concern money when one Country thumb down at the other Country's ruling party?
Secondly they do not like Chinese to be on equal footing with them.
MR HAD BEEN, go and read through your posts if you forget who asked the question of how manyboardroomsyou have been to in the first place.
The subject for discussion here is SGX and Aussie. Keep to the subject.
My liverpool football team buy-over is just an old example of how the Caucasians will never let Chinese be on equal footing with them. Same for this financial buyover case. I discuss within the subject while you turn it into a personal attack.
You are damn rude and brain fried.
Originally posted by Wiser:MR HAD BEEN, go and read through your posts if you forget who asked the question of how manyboardroomsyou have been to in the first place.
The subject for discussion here is SGX and Aussie. Keep to the subject.
My liverpool football team buy-over is just an old example of how the Caucasians will never let Chinese be on equal footing with them. Same for this financial buyover case. I discuss within the subject while you turn it into a personal attack.
You are damn rude and brain fried.
Oh, I didn't forget. You're just wishing I did because you still haven't provided an answer, and since you can't list any, logic dictates that your amount of knowledge about what happens at high levels the nice round number I specified in the first place - zero, just like you.
You're apparently too challenged to understand the blatently obvious, so once again I'll have to educate you. Whatever I asked does not change the fact that you asked how many boardrooms I have been in. If you want to bitch about not keeping to the topic, why don't you start by hammering yourself on the head for that transgression?
Funny how you keep talking about talking about ASX/SGX, but you haven't actually been saying anything about it in the first place. All you've been doing is crapping on about Chinese supremacy and football teams, both of which have bugger-all to do with the ASX/SGX topic that you repeatedly and hypocritically claim to want to talk about. My nagging suspicion is that you don't actually have anything to say about it, and you're just making noise to get attention. The irony, of course, is that when you do get attention, you bleat about it.
Yes, I'm rude, and I'm also bloody arrogant - I know I am and it's irrelevant because I'm also bloody good at what I do. What is relevant is that you crap on about unrelated rubbish while claiming that you want to stay focussed on the topic at hand, which makes you a moron, a hypocrite and a flaming arsehole.
Yes, Gedanken, you ARE right.
And heck, is Singapore even a 'autocracy'?
Not to mention the word "democratic society" in our pledge.
Sounds more like COMMUNIST, like China.
But at least China is better than Singapore, in terms of corruption as a whole. You think Singapore is not corrupted? Think again.
Singapore Parliament... Gamblers everywhere.
http://politics.sgforums.com/forums/10/topics/333093?page=27
Read on and you will thank me, and AndrewPKYap as well.
Australia is famous for being racist. They killed Indian Students and bullied the Chinese Students.
You expect a racist Aussie to accept Singapore Chinese to be in the same boardroom with them. They will puke first. Especially at you Gendeken. Your naive arrogance is your downfall. Plus with your shitty mouth, they will definitely barred you at the door.
How is China less corrupted than Singapore? Didn't you see the news of a family of 7 being forced to evacute when they just started their business in one area. The compensation was swallowed by the officials and the Seven knelt at the road to tell their tragic story.
There is corruption everywhere but i don't think China can be less corrupted than Singapore. They have no regard for human rights.
Oh yeah?
Singapore’s Internet Code of Practice simply states that all media laws apply to the internet. Such as :
“4- (1) Prohibited material is material that is objectionable on the grounds of public interest, public morality, public order, public security, national harmony, or is otherwise prohibited by applicable Singapore laws”.(http://www.mda.gov.sg/wms.file/mobj/mobj.497.internet_code.pdf)
The above clause is classified under the Singapore Broadcasting Act, which states :
“An Internet Content Provider who is or is determined by the Authority to be a body of persons engaged in the propagation, promotion or discussion of political or religious issues relating to Singapore on the World Wide Web through the Internet, shall register with the Authority within 14 days after the commencement of its service, or within such longer time as the Authority may permit.” (http://www.mda.gov.sg/wms.file/mobj/mobj.487.ClassLicence.pdf)
This means that online journalists or a citizen is no less accountable for publishing content online! There is still fear of reprisal as content providers need be fully accountable for content of discussions published. Self-censorship is the end result, and this kills public discourse even though the internet and its allowance for democratic use was looked upon to be the end for all authoritarian regimes.
lols...and you think China will only just fine ? There is still one China author behind jail leh and other countries gave this author a award for writing an honest book. lols...so how can Singapore be less corrupted than China. In fact with your example, i can tell Singapore is way way democratic liao.
Originally posted by Wiser:Australia is famous for being racist. They killed Indian Students and bullied the Chinese Students.
You expect a racist Aussie to accept Singapore Chinese to be in the same boardroom with them. They will puke first. Especially at you Gendeken. Your naive arrogance is your downfall. Plus with your shitty mouth, they will definitely barred you at the door.
Gee, are you really that stupid? No, I mean really?
I've already stated that I'm a partner in a consulting firm, but despite my describing the client list, you're obviously too dim to put two and two together and work out that the firm is either in Australia, the UK or the US. Well the fact is that it's in Australia, and not only did I make partnership, it was offered to me without my having to ask for it.
On top of that, four times a year my firm hires one out of typically 70 graduate applicants, and the minimum standard considered for applicants is an Honours degree. The new hires are put through a probationary period, and typically only one passes probation each year. Over more than a decade, I'm the only one to have been offered partnership.
You're probably too dull to do the math so I'll have to spoonfeed you once again. The partnership, offered by an Australian owner, puts me in over the top 0.002% (that's a conservative figure, by the way) of my game against a whole lot of Australians.
So you just keep playing with your little expectations, fool - I'll just sit here laughing at you while enjoying how the reality of my position easily keeps me in Wagyu and Bollinger.
Yes, I'm that fucking good and I have the cash flow to go with it. You, on the other hand, are content to waste all this time making up excuses and conspiracy theories - you really must have some significant inadequacies to compensate for. I won't embarrass you by asking what pittance you make a month (you'd be too much of a coward to answer that anyway), but it certainly would be less than (and I'm being charitable here) five grand a month.
And if you really must know, my arrogance is in fact one of my greatest assets. Every Friday evening, just before I wind up the week, my team and I pop open a nice bottle of red and have a laugh at go-nowhere losers like you who choose to spend their time and energy producing excuses instead of results. It's a helluva way to start the weekend.
Originally posted by Whocaresboutya:Yes, Gedanken, you ARE right.
And heck, is Singapore even a 'autocracy'?
Not to mention the word "democratic society" in our pledge.
Sounds more like COMMUNIST, like China.
But at least China is better than Singapore, in terms of corruption as a whole. You think Singapore is not corrupted? Think again.
Singapore Parliament... Gamblers everywhere.
http://politics.sgforums.com/forums/10/topics/333093?page=27
Read on and you will thank me, and AndrewPKYap as well.
Frankly, I don't think corruption is the key issue here. Autocracy, on the other hand, is a major concern - let's face it, would you want to make your organisation available to somewone who demonstrates absolutely no accountability?
So Mr Big Mouth worked for an Australian , no wonder you die die must defend the Aussie. I call that a traitor in the making.
Are you dreaming about your boardroom meeting, popping red wine and conspiring with who ? If you are that competent , no need to spend time here. You have no viewpoint on the subject up there except to cover your backside in case you get kick out for speaking up for your country. Is that Australia or Singapore btw ?
So what how many percent are honors degree ? and you drink the blood water, your lifestyle has nothing to do with the topic on discuss here. So stop your howlian and focus on SGX and Aussie's racism.
If you got it... flaunt it. xD
Its election time, even AndrewPKYap has come alive...hahahaha
gedankan,
in hating the PAP,your ways have turned u into another.......type variation of the PAP.
change your ways or die.
Originally posted by Fryderyk HPH:Better than you. At least he's rich.
hush fry!thats no way to talk to lady!u chinaman is it??