Government encourages more Singapore PRs to take up citizens
-
Government encourages more Singapore PRs to take up citizenship
By Imelda Saad | Posted: 06 September 2010 2323 hrsSINGAPORE: The Singapore Government is moving to encourage more Permanent Residents in the country to take up citizenship.
Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong said some PRs will be approached to become citizens and if they don't do so, their status will not be renewed.
Immigration was one of many issues tackled during a dialogue session with over 200 residents from Marine Parade to gather feedback on the Prime Minister's National Day Rally.
SM Goh did not give details on getting PRs to take up citizenship.
"Moving forward, we are going to approach some of them to take up Singapore citizenship, if they don't then their PR will not be renewed. That's a better way.
"We now have quite a few PRs, 500,000 in Singapore, so hopefully maybe 50,000 can be selected to become Singapore citizens, the rest can be PRs, contributing to Singapore's economy," he said.
SM Goh was responding to a suggestion from a participant who said Employment Pass holders should take up citizenship which he believed will discourage foreign talents from working in Singapore.
Besides, SM Goh pointed out that Employment Pass holders serve as buffers where their numbers can be reduced during a downturn.
Another radical suggestion put forward was to bar foreigners from buying private property but SM Goh noted developers would just build more high-rise private apartments to counter it.
"At the moment, our policy will be, condominium, private sector. They want to buy, let them buy because they actually bring in money for Singapore. They may not actually stay there but they bring in money.
"They buy from locals, locals are happy to get the money but it's not actually adding to space. In fact, that's actually ideal. They buy here, they don't drive cars, they don't live here, we just get their money! They're buying air!" laughed SM Goh.
Separately, SM Goh revealed it will cost S$1 billion to upgrade the train signalling system to increase capacity and reduce the waiting time for commuters.
He said problems can be resolved rationally but noted that for every solution, there are consequences.
Citing overcrowding in trains, SM Goh said the problem is expected and can be addressed.
In this case, resources have to be put in place to upgrade the system.
The cost may not be passed down to commuters directly, but SM Goh pointed out that it has to be defrayed.
Similarly, there are consequences with measures introduced in the property sector.
SM Goh acknowledged the situation has resulted in many unhappy Singaporeans, and he sought to put things in perspective.
"Those who missed out, those who can't buy this, who can't upgrade and so on, so we are really feeling the unhappiness, question is was the policy good?
"Unhappiness, those who are happier, in total there's net happiness, there's no such thing called total happiness, don't believe in it. It's whether we create net happiness in all this," said SM Goh.
He added it is "very difficult to satisfy everybody" and in politics, trying to make everybody happy is "impossible".
They key, said SM Goh is to "make the most number of people happy, the most number of times".
Another idea worth considering in managing transport woes is to have a "zero vehicular traffic growth".
"Let the COE take care of the number for cars on the road so when the number of cars cannot grow when the COE is so high then the roads will be freer so it's a combination of high COEs and low ERP.
"But we have opted in the last 10 years or so to give Singaporeans the 4 wheels so we have opted for 3 per cent growth in vehicle population and therefore use ERP to tweak it because one can argue that's fairer." he said.
The question is to decide which is the best way forward, said the Senior Minister.
He also answered questions on why the S$9,000 award to recognise the contributions of NSmen is not extended to all who have served the country.
SM Goh said authorities can consider giving older Singaporeans a token for their contributions.
"I think the old days, the financial sacrifices were much more because you were paid just a nominal sum but there were other benefits. If you were born earlier, maybe you bought your HDB flat cheaper! So you cannot argue.
"Your point is whether we can recognise in some way, token well I think we take note so that in future, they can remember the older ones, just a token, maybe past 55, help them with their medical top ups, I think that's possible. It's a suggestion we will take note."
SM Goh was relaxed and candid in his answers. At several points, he threw questions back, seeking a consensus on issues.
His message - that Singapore's problems can be resolved rationally, no matter how complex, with a good dose of the Singapore Spirit. - CNA/fa++++++++++++++++++++
Know the article above is kind of old news but what motivated this piece of news to be posted here is because I just got to know from a foreigner that many other foreigners she knows of including herself and husband are angry and affected by what Goh Chok Tong said - threat not to renew their PR status.
Haha, backfired though following after this there are words to pacify these foreigners.
-
"Moving forward, we are going to approach some of them to take up Singapore citizenship, if they don't then their PR will not be renewed. That's a better way
This is as good as pointing a gun on ppl heads.
SM Goh said authorities can consider giving older Singaporeans a token for their contributions.
The word token speaks volume.
-
Either it's their way or the highway.
-
I really dont know whether this will work or not on the PRs living here in spore.
-
PM LHL said, "if you dun try, nothing works"
-
plenty of fish in the sea.....
-
Originally posted by angel7030:
PM LHL said, "if you dun try, nothing works"
He's asking you to try work harder.Hahahaha
-
and they also say, the harder, the better...am i right??, tho i never try
-
Originally Posted by EnigmaE
At asiaone forumsYes I have seen these sort of PR(s) in Singapore, condemning government and Singaporeans.
This story is classic. This boy was recruited by Singapore government from Guangdong to study in Singapore, he was given a scholarship with lodging as he was top student from Guangdong. He got first class honours in NUS engineering and later Masters, all funded by government. He has to serve 3 years bond in Singapore (meaning he has to work in SG not anywhere else), so with his results he joined GLC ie SingXXX. Two laters later, he hopped to a MNC ie DigiXXX given big pay rise, almost close to $5000 from his last pay of $2500. Soon there was an opening in the States for a Project Manager post, he applied to relocate and he got it and he moved to Washington.
Then he started to MSN.. asking about Singapore:-
1. Singapore is a bs country, the democracy is fake, it is even worst than China.
2. Their leaders all stupid to bring us to Singapore, gave us scholarship and allowance, we dont even have to spend a cent.
3. Thanks to Singapore, I can move to US now, and getting my citizenship very soon.
4. Singaporeans think they can speak English well... most of them like SHXX and its Singlish... and their Mandarin suXXs. And Singaporeans are lazy....
5. I will never come back to Singapore, its a shxx country; they think they can be like US.... So is Singapore still importing a lot of students from China and India? Serve them right, we are here to screw them after we find our way to US or Europe. You guys are tupid what.... cant help it.
He MSN on a daily basis to ask about the government and its autocractic style and insulting fellow Singaporeans on being KIASU, KIASI and stupid.
So when you talked about the bullies, these PRs have similar mentalities -
Originally posted by MeOwSuSan:Originally Posted by EnigmaE
At asiaone forumsYes I have seen these sort of PR(s) in Singapore, condemning government and Singaporeans.
This story is classic. This boy was recruited by Singapore government from Guangdong to study in Singapore, he was given a scholarship with lodging as he was top student from Guangdong. He got first class honours in NUS engineering and later Masters, all funded by government. He has to serve 3 years bond in Singapore (meaning he has to work in SG not anywhere else), so with his results he joined GLC ie SingXXX. Two laters later, he hopped to a MNC ie DigiXXX given big pay rise, almost close to $5000 from his last pay of $2500. Soon there was an opening in the States for a Project Manager post, he applied to relocate and he got it and he moved to Washington.
Then he started to MSN.. asking about Singapore:-
1. Singapore is a bs country, the democracy is fake, it is even worst than China.
2. Their leaders all stupid to bring us to Singapore, gave us scholarship and allowance, we dont even have to spend a cent.
3. Thanks to Singapore, I can move to US now, and getting my citizenship very soon.
4. Singaporeans think they can speak English well... most of them like SHXX and its Singlish... and their Mandarin suXXs. And Singaporeans are lazy....
5. I will never come back to Singapore, its a shxx country; they think they can be like US.... So is Singapore still importing a lot of students from China and India? Serve them right, we are here to screw them after we find our way to US or Europe. You guys are tupid what.... cant help it.
He MSN on a daily basis to ask about the government and its autocractic style and insulting fellow Singaporeans on being KIASU, KIASI and stupid.
So when you talked about the bullies, these PRs have similar mentalities
Its ok, my dad is also british trained, live there for sometimes, came back and on several occasion also scolded and said bad about the Brits for their way of living, as our PM said, "we accept constructive criticism" and on the other hand, the labour chief said "we are deaf to critics" so it is either you accept it, improve on the weakness said about us, or you dun bother about all this shit. UNDERSTAND
