Originally posted by ☃®:There has been sensational story so far from anyone who voted for opposed…get it clear .no proven cases, only speculation…
" We vote for opposition, just to prove PAP will still win."
Originally posted by ditzy:True, even if they don't trace your NRIC numbers, they just have to trace it to your mailing addresses. How do they send you your polling registration cards?
Lee Kuan Yew must die.
PAP rule must end to free Singaporeans.
Originally posted by ☃®:I hate delusional people, they are worst then retards.
I also hate delusional people.
They simply refuse to see facts and prefer to live in their own world.
Singapore's Two-Faced Judiciary
http://www.asiasentinel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=527&Itemid=31
5.0 out of 5 stars
Beyond Suspicion? The Singapore Judiciary by Francis T Seow
Francis Seow's meticulous and skilful narration of events introduces the reader to the unique political climate in Singapore. Who would have thought that discussions and questions concerning the sale of several luxurious apartments to politicians and well-known individuals, including Supreme Court judges would result in 13 lawsuits being served on a single Singapore citizen, Tang Liang Hong.
Seow's detailed and eloquent description of how hard senior lawyers worked for their clients, the Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, Senior Minister and several cabinet ministers against Tang Liang Hong, his lawyer, J B Jeyaretnam and his wife, Teo Siew Har is disturbing. It was spine chilling to read how at midnight, lawyers and inland revenue officials served summonses on Teo Siew Har at her residence after her forced return by the immigration authority at the Johor-Singapore causeway.
The participation and non participation of lawyers in the lawsuits against Tang Liang Hong, J B Jeyaretnam and Teo Siew Har culminating in the bankruptcy of all three (J B Jeyaretnam was bankrupted by a litigant in an unconnected lawsuit) should prick the conscience of lawyers and judges. The manner in which court officials and Supreme Court judges handled the plethora of lawsuits against the three give much food for thought.
Never before has a book that gives such deep insights into the workings of the Singapore courts been published. I recommend this book to anyone who wants to understand Singapore and Singaporeans.
Francis Seow joined the Singapore Legal Service in 1956 and was Solicitor-General from 1966 to 1972.
Teo Soh Lung
Singapore
1 November 2007
Originally posted by ☃®:Dobt think fear and delusion works any more in the coming erection
Lee Kuan Yew must die first.
seow liao
`The thesis presented here will not only change the way in which we understand contemporary Singaporean society and the relationship between the state and its citizens, but will also provoke a debate about the social costs of economic development in other parts of the world, and the future security of the island republic - increasingly a Chinese enclave in a Malay sea - in the twenty-first century.' - Peter Carey, Trinity College, Oxford This study examines the development of Singapore's complex system of social regulation in relation to the phases of its economic strategy and political transition.
It focuses on the way social control works through public housing and welfare, education, parliamentary politics and the law. It draws out the implications of such comprehensive control for political conflict. Popular explanations for Singapore's success and its status as a model for other developing countries are brought into question.
The Media, Cultural Control and Government in Singapore
This book explores this inherent contradiction present in most facets of Singaporean media, cultural and political discourses, and identifies the key regulatory strategies and technologies that the ruling People Action Party (PAP) employs to regulate Singapore media and culture, and thus govern the thoughts and conduct of Singaporeans.
It establishes the conceptual links between government and the practice of cultural policy, arguing that contemporary cultural policy in Singapore has been designed to shape citizens into accepting and participating in the rationales of government.
Outlining the historical development of cultural policy, including the recent expansion of cultural regulatory and administrative practices into the ‘creative industries’, Terence Lee analyzes the attempts by the Singaporean authorities to engage with civil society, the ways in which the media is used to market the PAP’s policies and leadership and the implications of the internet for the practice of governmental control.
Overall, The Media, Cultural Control and Government in Singapore offers an original approach towards the rethinking of the relationship between media, culture and politics in Singapore, demonstrating that the many contradictory discourses around Singapore only make sense once the politics and government of the media and culture are understood.
Originally posted by ☃®:U idiots are not csj, jbj or any other famous personality, why are u worried for?
Because I care about Singapore.
I am not an alien in Singapore.
I am a citizen born in Singapore.
Originally posted by Vote PAP OUT to Save SG:Because I care about Singapore.
I am not an alien in Singapore.
I am a citizen born in Singapore.
Originally posted by Vote PAP OUT to Save SG:Singapore's Two-Faced Judiciary
http://www.asiasentinel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=527&Itemid=31
5.0 out of 5 stars
Beyond Suspicion? The Singapore Judiciary, November 1, 2007This review is from: Beyond Suspicion? The Singapore Judiciary (Southeast Asia Studies Monograph Series) (Paperback)Beyond Suspicion? The Singapore Judiciary by Francis T Seow
Francis Seow's meticulous and skilful narration of events introduces the reader to the unique political climate in Singapore. Who would have thought that discussions and questions concerning the sale of several luxurious apartments to politicians and well-known individuals, including Supreme Court judges would result in 13 lawsuits being served on a single Singapore citizen, Tang Liang Hong.
Seow's detailed and eloquent description of how hard senior lawyers worked for their clients, the Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, Senior Minister and several cabinet ministers against Tang Liang Hong, his lawyer, J B Jeyaretnam and his wife, Teo Siew Har is disturbing. It was spine chilling to read how at midnight, lawyers and inland revenue officials served summonses on Teo Siew Har at her residence after her forced return by the immigration authority at the Johor-Singapore causeway.
The participation and non participation of lawyers in the lawsuits against Tang Liang Hong, J B Jeyaretnam and Teo Siew Har culminating in the bankruptcy of all three (J B Jeyaretnam was bankrupted by a litigant in an unconnected lawsuit) should prick the conscience of lawyers and judges. The manner in which court officials and Supreme Court judges handled the plethora of lawsuits against the three give much food for thought.
Never before has a book that gives such deep insights into the workings of the Singapore courts been published. I recommend this book to anyone who wants to understand Singapore and Singaporeans.
Francis Seow joined the Singapore Legal Service in 1956 and was Solicitor-General from 1966 to 1972.
Teo Soh Lung
Singapore
1 November 2007
He's the one who almost win Enous GRC?
Originally posted by ☃®:Dobt think fear and delusion works any more in the coming erection…the ground has changed and many citizens are unemployed, in debt and compete with foreigners. When u can’t live yr life, no amount of fear and delusion can sway u…
As Low Thia Khiang said at the last election: "Don't be scared of PAP. Why should you? No need to. It should be the other way round, PAP fear you, PAP fear your vote."
Originally posted by Positron:I think there's this myth circulating around for a long time about votes being tracked.
Believe it or not,alot of ppl still think voting is not confidential and votes can be tracked down.
I believe with the next general election coming,It's better to discuss about this.
Is this a myth? Is this a truth? Myth buster!!! Watch too much of the show.
Voting slip got serial number, strick off against your ic number.
Can track?
Originally posted by βÎτά:
Lee's Law lor.
OMG! Is that a real book which I havent seen before?
Originally posted by tranquilice:
As Low Thia Khiang said at the last election: "Don't be scared of PAP. Why should you? No need to. It should be the other way round, PAP fear you, PAP fear your vote."
I respect Mr Low. Salute.
Originally posted by Vote PAP OUT to Save SG:I see no reason why voting should be secret.
If I get to vote in coming elections, I will openly announce in this forum which party I voted.
You already reveal in your nickname.. LOL...
Originally posted by ditzy:" We vote for opposition, just to prove PAP will still win."
even if can track so what ???
in any case, at the most PAP will only track the higher civil servants only...............for obvious reasons...........
they can't be bothered with the countless lowly civil servants and other people...............
end of the day, if scared of this ........scared of that..............then DON'T COMPLAIN.............since no guts to even try to change things............