Originally posted by likeyou:What if death sentences impose wrongly to a person?
Something like being make use of?
Mancha can reply to your questions
Originally posted by likeyou:What if death sentences impose wrongly to a person?
Something like being make use of?
Like i said in this case, will any sentence be fair ? Give you 20 years in prison, will it be fair also ? Dont give me the, ya 20 years prison of course better. Different case this time. Its the wrong of the law.
Originally posted by PRP:Mancha can reply to your questions
PRP won't reply because he is biased. He thinks Singapore is looking forward to hanging as many people as possible.
It is always a sad case when the customs officer or CNB officers nab someone who is carrying the drugs above the amount prescribed by law.
There must be no wavering in the application of the law. No buts....otherwise the whole system, past, present and future will be questionable.
Investigation are two pronged, one to establish knowledge and the other if there is a possibility of being set up.
All drug couriers profess innocence, that is their SOP, ie. they did not know, it was their (uncontactable) "friend" who gave them the package etc, etc.
All those who were hanged knew they were carrying drugs for a fee. This is established by the way they hid the drugs and their story when they reveal their connections. There is no mistake. The only mistake is on the couriers part, they got caught, and can't prove they were NOT delivering drugs.
Just prove you are not delivering, and it is for personal consumption. If the prosecution demolish that defence, you are dead.
Personal consumption?
If one is innocent, life sentence is better than death penalty for most ppl.He at least have a chance to live in the prison (free of charge!) and even to leave the prison one day.
If a person is innocent and get death penalty,it is a very grave miscarriage of justice.
Lol wtf.. i dint know 20 years of prison is that cool You obviously do not know how mindfarking prison is. Seems like you also rejected my opinion of any sentence being not fair
One can get used to even very hard situation.
Some ppl complain why should we feed the criminals free of charge.
Originally posted by PRP:If one is innocent, life sentence is better than death penalty for most ppl.He at least have a chance to live in the prison (free of charge!) and even to leave the prison one day.
If a person is innocent and get death penalty,it is a very grave miscarriage of justice.
Originally posted by PRP:One can get used to even very hard situation.
Some ppl complain why should we feed the criminals free of charge.
Originally posted by PRP:One can get used to even very hard situation.
Some ppl complain why should we feed the criminals free of charge.
No wait. I dont understand what you are talking now
Originally posted by PRP:One can get used to even very hard situation.
Some ppl complain why should we feed the criminals free of charge.
So I take it that you're fine with paying for food + shelter + medical care for criminals for the rest of their lives?
Even those who outright endanger our society by flooding it with drugs?
Originally posted by PRP:If one is innocent, life sentence is better than death penalty for most ppl.He at least have a chance to live in the prison (free of charge!) and even to leave the prison one day.
If a person is innocent and get death penalty,it is a very grave miscarriage of justice.
convicting an innocent person is a grave miscarriage of justice.
one day in prison is a bad , unless you have no hope of a job, no reputation to defend, just want to go inside and have free meal, free lodging, free clothing.
For the guilty, yes, "life sentence is better than death penalty". Are you guilty of drug trafficking?
Those who support death penalty like to refute my opinions.I find all their refuttings are wrong but I leave them to the readers to judge whose arguments are right.
Why do they keep comment on my opinions?I argue death penalty for drug trafficking should be abolished and they can argue the opposite.Let us see their arguments why death penalty on drug trafficking should stay.Why have there been so few?
The govt says they respect ppl who argue against death penalty.
Originally posted by PRP:Those who support death penalty like to refute my opinions.I find all their refutals are wrong but I leave them to the readers to judge whose arguments are right.
Why do they keep comment on my opinions?I argue death penalty for drug trafficking should be abolished and the can argue the opposite.Let us see their arguments why death penalty on drug trafficking should stay.Why have there be so few?
The govt says they respect ppl who argue against death penalty.
If you are not looking for comments, why borther comming here to start a thread?
Btw, the arguments for death penalty are not ''so few'' Did you read this page at all ?
And lastly Commenting does not not respecting
Originally posted by TTFU:If you are not looking for comments, why borther comming here to start a thread?
Btw, the arguments for death penalty are not ''so few'' Did you read this page at all ?
And lastly Commenting does not not respecting
What I said is be positive.I argue my stand and you all argue yours.I have a lot of arguments yet to put up.Do you all have?
All my arguments are right.How can one refute them?I wouldn't want to refute comments from you all is partly due to not wanting to make you all unhappy.
Originally posted by PRP:What I said is be positive.I argue my stand and you all argue yours.I have a lot of arguments yet to put up.Do you all have?
All my arguments are right.How can one refute them?I wouldn't want to refute comments from you all is partly due to not wanting to make you all unhappy.
Be positive? Do you mean that those for death penalty are negative ? Now is page 5, if you wanna start posting your arguments at page 99, fine with me. lol..
So far till now, i see no rebuttal. While i saw plenty of rebuttal on your opinions. I guess this thread is mature enough, so you can start posting your real points.
Dont worry, i wont get butt hurt easily
Be constructive.
Don't keep commenting others are wrong.It is possible that others are not wrong.It is you who doesn't understand correctly.
Just formulate your own arguments to support your stand.
well, is PAP constructive in their approach??
Originally posted by PRP:Be constructive.
Don't keep commenting others are wrong.It is possible that others are not wrong.It is you who doesn't understand correctly.
Just formulate your own arguments to support your stand.
Ever heard of ostrich burying its head into the sand story ? Get real.
Still no argument ? Or is this thread going towards page 99
oh, i love ostrich meat...eh...just helping to reach pg 99
Originally posted by PRP:Be constructive.
Don't keep commenting others are wrong.It is possible that others are not wrong.It is you who doesn't understand correctly.
Just formulate your own arguments to support your stand.
Originally posted by skythewood:
Actually, i don't really care about the death penalty.
I support death penalty, some people's head should be cut off.
The TS will say, just because you people think i am wrong doesnt mean i am wrong !!
Originally posted by angel7030:well, is PAP constructive in their approach??
U are supporting a PAP's policy!