Jailed and fined for self defence lol
-
Originally posted by angel7030:
huh! not morning meh....oops sori, just woke up, sky look so dark like in the morning..what a cool day...to sharpen chopper
angel... i am sleepy... tell me some bedtime stories? -
u just sleep on yr masterbed and the dream will start...
-
Originally posted by angel7030:
u just sleep on yr masterbed and the dream will start...
let's dream togther hao ma? i yearn to see u in my dream
-
haiz! give up...
-
Originally posted by angel7030:
haiz! give up...
i wont give up..... accept me?? -
Best is not to quarrel or fight in real life, run away and turn your back away from aggression and avoid all forms of transgression.
Health and Peace are most important in real life.
-
Sex is also important in life...pyschologist said, without it, most will go heywire, especially for men
-
misconception of what constitutes self defence.
-
This just shows the judge is a idiot with no brains
-
and why did hawker use chopper for???he could have taken a noodle soup ladle to defend himself???its a stick that can inflict heavy damage too?and what if chopper slipped from hand and flew into badz maro and angelk73 having pork porridge breakfast together??will chopper sink into angel73 or badzmaro or some kid walking past coffeeshop??
-
i loveangel,
???eh??u mean u still so interested in angel7030 after she post her new av looking like a merciless grandmother??
are u a serial killer by the way?
-
Originally posted by Terminator Hitman:
i loveangel,
???eh??u mean u still so interested in angel7030 after she post her new av looking like a merciless grandmother??
are u a serial killer by the way?
hello termite, we are lovers since 2007...so dun put termite in our bed ya -
..........................................
above are the termites on yer bed .
-
Man A hits Man B - Man A's fault
Man B hits Man A back as self-defence - Man B's Fault
FINAL VERDICT : Fishball noodles seller fault
-
Originally posted by Dragonaxe:
Man A hits Man B - Man A's fault
Man B hits Man A back as self-defence - Man B's Fault
FINAL VERDICT : Fishball noodles seller fault
Fishball or noodle fault?? -
Police report against relief cabby: Real Threat or Mere Paranoia?
TEMASEK REVIEW
During a visit to Sai Kung last Sunday to promote his reform package to the people, Hong Kong Chief Executive Donald Tsang was greeted by hundreds of disgruntled citizens who heckled, abused and accused him of “selling out” the people. (read report here)
Not only must he put up with a torrent of verbal abuse including vulgarities in Cantonese from the crowd, he also had to guard himself against possible flying eggs and slippers thrown at him from nowhere.
One protestor ran towards him swearing to “do him in” and was stopped by the police before he could reach Tsang. Despite the cacophony, no arrests were made. The police simply stood by and watched.
Had the scenario occurred in Singapore, riot trucks will be called in immediately and the protestors arrested and brought away forcefully by our Singapore Police Force.
Last week, a 52 year old relief cabby Mr Teo Kian Seng was charged in court for “threatening” his PAP MP Lee Yi Shyan. One would have thought that he must have done or said some horrible things to scare the wits out of the newbie MP, but all he did was to remind Lee that he hoped he would not see a “repeat” of the torching incident of Seng Han Thong last year.
How this can be construed or misconstrued as a “threat” by the MP and the Singapore police is anybody’s guess. The poor man had gone to see Lee at his Meet-the-People session in Bedok over a summons received by his elderly mother for leaving her “garang-guni” along the corridor.
The media did not report what transpire in the conversation between the two men, but surely Mr Teo would not have uttered those regrettable words for no good reason.
Either he was provoked into doing so or he had a slip of tongue. One thing for sure: the exchange between Mr Teo and Lee is unlikely to be a pleasant encounter.
In all likelihood, Mr Teo probably said the “threatening” sentence out of anger or frustration and bears no malice or ill-will for it was not mentioned if Mr Teo had raised his voice or behaved in a hostile manner towards Lee.
An understanding and magnanimous gentleman would have forgotten the incident and let it pass instead of lodging a police report.
In most cases, the police will not even bother to investigate and will simply refer the complainant to the Magistrate’s court, but of course when it involves a PAP MP, they are especially “efficient”.
The PAP MPs should realize that they are bound to encounter rude, unpleasant and unruly residents during their grassroots work. There will be people who are unhappy, peeved and angry at the government and they will naturally become their immediate targets to vent their frustrations on.
During his visit to Tainan county last year in the aftermath of the Typhoon Morakot, Taiwanese President Ma Ying-Jeou was mobbed by angry villagers who threatened to beat him into a pulp. The unfortunate scene was telecast “live” on Taiwanese TV.
Elsewhere in Asia, it is relatively common to see lawmakers being heckled, abused and even beaten physically by disgruntled citizens when they are out in the public.
While violent behavior should not be condoned and deserved to be prosecuted, more discretion should be exercised by the authorities in the dealing of cases like Mr Teo’s which appears to be ambiguous in nature.
The role of an MP is to serve as an intermediary between the people and the government and to be an official channel for feedback from the ground, whether positive or negative.
Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew wrote in his memoirs that he and his entourage was jeered, heckled and jostled by opposition supporters when he was campaigning for the PAP in strongholds held by the Barisan Sosialis and he was even pushed into the drain on one occasion.
The present generation of new PAP MPs are indeed “strawberry” MPs who appear unable to differentiate between real threat and mere paranoia.
Facing and dealing with unhappy Singaporeans are part and parcel of their work as MPs. If the PAP MPs are so easily “threatened”, then perhaps they should seriously reconsider their positions as representatives of the people in Parliament.
It is so much easier being a MP in Singapore compared to Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea and other Asian countries and it is a shame that PAP MPs still get paranoid over such trivial incidents.
These are the kind of MPs we get when they do not have to fight tooth and nail for every single vote from the people and are whisked into Parliament either through walkovers or GRCs.
Under the PAP’s uninterrupted rule for more than five decades, the term “MP” has taken a new definition altogether. Instead of serving the people as they should be, they are now behaving like little emperors whom the people must kowtow to and beg on their knees for help.
-
I think you should be glad that we dun behave like HKees, we respect our leaders, as we voted them, if we are to throw eggs and shout vulgarities to our leaders, i think we are scolding ourselves.
Donald Duck or tsang is different, he is place there by the special adminstration govt controlled by beijing, so you got to be clear about this...quake quake..eh..