Bringing reference to the former 'rugby fiasco' incident reported in the Straits times a few weeks ago. 80% of the articles were all lies and utter bullshit.
1. St Andrews and ACS Supporters did not fight
2. Leonard Wee didn't point the middle finger or scold insults about Daniel's mother
3. There was no big brawl whatsoever, just a scuffle between a few players
4. The referee was constantly taunted by St Andrews Supporters and parents after the match (stated in his official match report)
5. Somewhere through the middle of the second half, A St Andrews Rugger tackled a ACS rugger down the sideline off the field into St Andrew Supporters. the Supporters were seen kicking the ACS Rugger who was on the floor. (Stated in his official match report)
6. Straits Times is not bias to ACS, it just used whatever information it had (and obviously did not verify if it was right or wrong) and put it onto national newspapers. Making a mountain of the Molehill
7. Leonard Wee's Mother had every right to report to the police. If someone hit your son in the face intentionally, you would quite obviously be angry and report the incident.
8. The 2 boys assaulted outside the Old Police Academy at a bus stop did not taunt the St Andrews Sec 4 student in civilian clothes at all but were punched, slapped and spitted on. However, they stood their ground and did not retaliate.
Because of the Straits Times Reports, both School's reputations have been tarnished. I do feel a sense of shame that a National Newspaper has done such a thing.
...OMG!...so childish??
we had more impt things to worry abt than some sch boy fighting.
no wonder i dont see future in singapore youth
Originally posted by reyes:we had more impt things to worry abt than some sch boy fighting.
no wonder i dont see future in singapore youth
I am worry for the next generation.
I find youth, nowadays, more self-centred, narrow-minded than the generation before...
i dont care
Originally posted by 4sg:I am worry for the next generation.
I find youth, nowadays, more self-centred, narrow-minded than the generation before...
well, your parents said that same thing the last time when you were young
haha... "yi dai bu ru yi dai"
dai??? we not going dai ok, the last generation are gong gong dai dai one. That's why they choosed the wrong govt, now we have to suffer
Originally posted by DouglasBitMeFingerBoomz:Bringing reference to the former 'rugby fiasco' incident reported in the Straits times a few weeks ago. 80% of the articles were all lies and utter bullshit.
1. St Andrews and ACS Supporters did not fight
2. Leonard Wee didn't point the middle finger or scold insults about Daniel's mother
3. There was no big brawl whatsoever, just a scuffle between a few players
4. The referee was constantly taunted by St Andrews Supporters and parents after the match (stated in his official match report)
5. Somewhere through the middle of the second half, A St Andrews Rugger tackled a ACS rugger down the sideline off the field into St Andrew Supporters. the Supporters were seen kicking the ACS Rugger who was on the floor. (Stated in his official match report)
6. Straits Times is not bias to ACS, it just used whatever information it had (and obviously did not verify if it was right or wrong) and put it onto national newspapers. Making a mountain of the Molehill
7. Leonard Wee's Mother had every right to report to the police. If someone hit your son in the face intentionally, you would quite obviously be angry and report the incident.
8. The 2 boys assaulted outside the Old Police Academy at a bus stop did not taunt the St Andrews Sec 4 student in civilian clothes at all but were punched, slapped and spitted on. However, they stood their ground and did not retaliate.
Because of the Straits Times Reports, both School's reputations have been tarnished. I do feel a sense of shame that a National Newspaper has done such a thing.
no.. one.. gives.. a.. rat's... ass..
WTF! so much utter nonsense!
what nonsense is this?
Poor TS... after kenna flame for protecting his school in the other rugby fight thread... Now here also no support...
Pity him lah.
Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:Poor TS... after kenna flame for protecting his school in the other rugby fight thread... Now here also no support...
TS poor meh?
......
http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_523639.html
I read this in another forum.
ST reports less cash upfront for HDB flats but in the article it states that the median COV has gone up from $24K to $25K, an increase of $1,000.
This is called less cash upfront.
If ST lies or having facts hidden (Intentionally or not), u r no better either.
Originally posted by charlize:http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_523639.html
I read this in another forum.
ST reports less cash upfront for HDB flats but in the article it states that the median COV has gone up from $24K to $25K, an increase of $1,000.
This is called less cash upfront.
you have to pity the writer as he/she needs the creativities inorder for his/her articles to be published....
Originally posted by charlize:http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_523639.html
I read this in another forum.
ST reports less cash upfront for HDB flats but in the article it states that the median COV has gone up from $24K to $25K, an increase of $1,000.
This is called less cash upfront.
they forget to add that this is for first timer buyers on a new flat. Nothing to COV about.
My concern here is that they reported that all peoples (local Citizens and foreigners becoming citizens here) are able to serve their loan thru CPF without having to come out with cash everymonth. I mean a $2000 paid guy with a family of 4 can buy a $250,000 HDB with loan interest of 2%++ can go on without having to pay cash everymonth?? I doubt he could foot the bills.
And on the other hand, it show that to the HDB or govt, CPF is not cash, if you move into the HDB, look around the 4 walls and tell yourself, this is CPF fund, not cash?? this is CPF, not cash, this is CPF, not cash...and on and on..you work and toll your whole life ending up with no CPF.
Isn't Conservative charges is pay in cash?
i mean, everyone knows ST is a bullshit paper for politics but to have it that 80% of the reports are false? That's a bit too far fetched lol.
Agree, if not SPH will not have gain so much on their 1Q profit.
Originally posted by reyes:we had more impt things to worry abt than some sch boy fighting.
no wonder i dont see future in singapore youth
ya damn right. so why did they report so many articles on it in the 1st place?
Originally posted by Samuel Lee:If ST lies or having facts hidden (Intentionally or not), u r no better either.
why am i no better?
Originally posted by Rock^Star:i mean, everyone knows ST is a bullshit paper for politics but to have it that 80% of the reports are false? That's a bit too far fetched lol.
what i meant by saying that '80% of the articles were all lies and utter bullshit.' was refering to the articles posted bout the incident
Originally posted by angel7030:
TS poor meh?
wth?? poor in the sense of pitiful la.
wth u from taiwan issit -.-