Can PAP govt be fair?
-
Originally posted by Vote PAP OUT to Save SG:
Lee Kuan Yew also worked for Japanese in WWII while Japanese killed chinese in Singapore.
don't tell me this is a secret ?
if people know this fact, how come they vote for him in the past ?
one thing is for sure, this old mudder-farker is gonna get it BIG-TIME in his next life...............
-
Originally posted by Vote PAP OUT to Save SG:
Think that's true. Lee Kuan Yew has been playing on this fear for years to manipulate people to vote for PAP.
We'll see how things goes for PAP once he is dead.
If LKY passed away, which he would one of these days, Singapore will go into a chaotic changes, and you can see all kinds of trouble makers coming out on the streets, the gangster, the terrorist, the illegal immigrants, the aggressive opposition and those young stupid muddled head guys will be dancing and looting shops and houses as they go along.If he die, i better leave here, if not later kenna rape
-
Originally posted by angel7030:
If LKY passed away, which he would one of these days, Singapore will go into a chaotic changes, and you can see all kinds of trouble makers coming out on the streets, the gangster, the terrorist, the illegal immigrants, the aggressive opposition and those young stupid muddled head guys will be dancing and looting shops and houses as they go along.If he die, i better leave here, if not later kenna rape
光耀过世，天使7030走，天下太平，国泰民安� -
i rather things go to hell here than have that old bastard live another day longer !
-
Originally posted by angel7030:
If LKY passed away, which he would one of these days, Singapore will go into a chaotic changes, and you can see all kinds of trouble makers coming out on the streets, the gangster, the terrorist, the illegal immigrants, the aggressive opposition and those young stupid muddled head guys will be dancing and looting shops and houses as they go along.If he die, i better leave here, if not later kenna rape
If he die, i better leave here, if not later kenna rape
quickly, reserved a air ticket for taiwan
-
Originally posted by As romanista2001:
i rather things go to hell here than have that old bastard live another day longer !
hi there, need to be so extreme.he so old already
you still young not worth it
i want to see white hair attend black hair funeral
-
Originally posted by CheckmateA1:
hi there, need to be so extreme.he so old already
you still young not worth it
i want to see white hair attend black hair funeral
fyi, now even Ministers also dye and highlight their hair to golden or red color, no more what white hair sent black or black hair sent orange hair all these type of nonsense ya!! -
Originally posted by CheckmateA1:
If he die, i better leave here, if not later kenna rape
quickly, reserved a air ticket for taiwan
Can alway seek asylum in our taiwan embassy here mah, why need to book ticket. -
Originally posted by angel7030:
fyi, now even Ministers also dye and highlight their hair to golden or red color, no more what white hair sent black or black hair sent orange hair all these type of nonsense ya!!don't understand also never mind
-
Originally posted by angel7030:
Can alway seek asylum in our taiwan embassy here mah, why need to book ticket.
i now i know why you don't want to go back to taiwancos just gonna earthquake
-
Originally posted by CheckmateA1:
don't understand also never mind
then, what about those Ministers who are botak like Tharman, so, it become white hair attending botak funnral hor -
Originally posted by CheckmateA1:
i now i know why you don't want to go back to taiwancos just gonna earthquake
everywhere also got earthquake,...singapore also have mah, at Swenson -
Originally posted by angel7030:
everywhere also got earthquake,...singapore also have mah, at Swenson
But Singapore got haksinang yong tou fu made by threading a piece of thin bamboo through hum7030's labia majora and minora. -
ya, also got Hog Siao zwei wrap with banana leaf and steamed till 1000 degreee C
-
Originally posted by angel7030:
ya, also got Hog Siao zwei wrap with banana leaf and steamed till 1000 degreee C
胡言乱è¯ï¼Œå¥¸äººåŽ»æ»ï¼� -
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:
胡言乱è¯ï¼Œå¥¸äººåŽ»æ»ï¼�
die also must die in good hand, if the emperor wants his subject to die, subject cannot say no. -
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:
So you also plan to 赶 RP, 赶 WP,赶SDP,赶DPP and 赶NSP after you 赶 PAP?I agree with As romanista that cannot be a fair government in this world.
Does Samuel agree to be 赶 by Singaporeans for no rhyme or reason if the PAP is ever deposed by Samuel?
I dun plan to 赶 them, but after I have 赶 PAP, the next will be you and your motherfucker angel7030, angel3070 etc.
-
All these politically hungry Singaporeans want to vote. And they should.(photo credits:Vivekpix)Why we should go ahead with the walkover ban
Written on 25. Mar, 2010
By Christopher Ong in OpinionsIn his article to the forum, Straits Times reader Kong Siong Kwong suggests that the banning of walkovers in the next general election would be ‘inequitable’ to the nominees that run for political office.
They are ‘also Singaporean and entitled to his rights’, and we cannot ‘insist’ that they must secure more than 50 per cent of the vote ‘in order to establish that they have the support of the constituents.’
Mr. Kong has clearly interpreted the nature of the voting process on its head, and most certainly lopsidedly.
The onus is on the political nominees running for office to prove their support of the constituents, not for the constituents to prove that the nominees do not have their support.
The default position that should be first assumed is that the political nominees do not have the support of the constituents, and thus the need for a democratic process of voting to alter this default position.
Mr. Kong makes the assertion that the political nominees are ‘also Singaporeans’ and are ‘entitled to (their) rights’, but it is vague on what sort of ‘rights’ he is trying to bring into the argument.
In any case, if it is ‘rights’ that is the issue at stake here, can anything matter more in a period of general elections than the political rights of the vast number of Singaporeans in the constituent that do not have the chance to vote for who should represent them?
Mr. Kong then tactfully shifts the blame onto the opposition parties who, according to his line of argument, are unable to prove their mantle in the general elections by successfully fielding an opposition team comprising of 5 – 6 members in a GRC ward.
But this is not even the issue of contention over here. The real debate centers on whether we should allow a team of politicians who might not have the mandate of its constituents to represent them politically in office.
Should a group of 5 – 6 politicians who have only, say, 9% of total support in a GRC comprising of 60,000 people if a real vote is carried out, be allowed to represent them in the parliament just because there was no contest?
Taking our line of argument, the politicians do not have the mandate of the people in the event of a walkover. The default position that we have assumed has not altered.
Singaporeans have been accused of been a politically apathetic lot. But can one really blame them if they played no role in the political process that elected their representatives of parliament?
The GRC system serves to widen the distance between the constituents and those politically responsible to represent them, because the individuals running for political office were not elected on the basis of their constituents support in the first place.
Simply ask any one person in a GRC ward which had a walkover to name all of their MPs.
I am one of them and I am unable to name the entire team.
This is solely because I had no chance to vote in the previous election, and I took no part in the political process in putting them in office.
Surely my vote should not be assumed to be for the political nominees just because there was no contest?
This is the default position that Mr. Kong takes in shifting the onus of proof onto the constituents.
In his suggestion that opposition parties are not ready to field a team to contest a GRC ward, Mr. Kong neglects the fact that the GRC system can sometimes stymie the opposition parties efforts to do so.
In making his ’singular declaration’ that the GRC system serves the ‘honorable and pragmatic thoughts’ of the People’s Action Party (PAP) to equally represent all races, Mr. Kong seems to have contradicted himself when he pushes for a reduction of the number of individuals comprising a GRC team, from 5-6 to 3-4.
Would not such a reduction cause the races to be represented less equally, according to his argument?
It is clear that something is very fundamentally wrong with Mr. Kong’s position.
The GRC system is most certainly in need of a complete overhaul to account for the political rights of all Singaporeans to vote.
And this right cannot be denied no matter the circumstance.
-
Originally posted by Samuel Lee:
I dun plan to 赶 them, but after I have 赶 PAP, the next will be you and your motherfucker angel7030, angel3070 etc.
Why you don't plan to 赶 the rest since the rest will be just as corrupt as the PAP smear gang? Why must 赶 me since I awaken you to the fact that there are no fair political parties out there? -
i got nothing to do with this...scold mother some more...tsk ..tsk...
-
They want top salaries.Then they shouldn't behave like the common ppl.They should be extraordinary.
-
They r saints, not human
-
The latest changes in the law mean there will be at least 9 opposition MPs in the next parliament.From the present 3 opp. MP to 9 MPs,it will be quite a big change.
What I said above is true.
-
Originally posted by angel7030:
They r saints, not human
They are human being.You are fairy.
-
Personally i find it very unfair on the way PAP treat us Singapore Citizens , take the rules of house renting for example:
If the tenant rents the house & commits any illegal acts which offends the law ( like illegal subletting or illegal booking etc.) the owner of the house will face forfeiture of house , they can just say we ( as the owner) didn't conduct checks , but if they are not going to change this law , they should be voted out as the tenant can say " Nevermind la , after all i rented this house , anything we do inside , we don't need to bear the responsibility , the landlord bears it , if we're caught , we just go find another place to stay , what is so big deal?
Of course the tenant will think its none their business as the do not need to held any responsibility or bear any consequences as the consequences is being beared ny the landlord , don't you find it ridiculous? You think landlord will ever want to rent a house to someone like this? Of course not!!! The landlord is innocent!!! The tenants are the ones that should be held responsible! Do you agree?