�光耀当年对�/平说:
金庸å°�说“笑傲东å�—亚”是å�—?
Originally posted by parn:金庸å°�说“笑傲东å�—亚”是å�—?
i think it is more like.....
æ–°åŠ å�¡8部
Originally posted by Wmyongj:�光耀当年对�/平说:
当邓å°�平对æ�Žå…‰è€€ç§°èµžæ–°åŠ å�¡çš„巨大å�˜åŒ–和建设æˆ�就时,æ�Žå…‰è€€å›žç”è¯´ï¼Œè°¢è°¢ä½ ï¼Œè¿™æ˜¯ä¸€ä¸ªé�žå¸¸å°�的国家,容易管ç�†ã€‚é‚“å°�平深有感触地说é�“,是啊,å�‡å¦‚自己è¦�管ç�†çš„,å�ªæœ‰ä¸Šæµ·è¿™ä¹ˆä¸€å�—地方多好啊ï¼�æ�Žå…‰è€€å¯¹é‚“/å°�/平的这番感å�¹ä¸�ä»¥ä¸ºç„¶ã€‚ä»–ç”¨å¸¦æœ‰å‡ åˆ†“激将”çš„å�£æ°”说é�“ï¼šæ–°åŠ å�¡äººå¤§å¤šæ•°æ˜¯ä¸å›½å¹¿ä¸œã€�ç¦�建ç‰åœ°å�—方人的å�Žè£”,祖先都是目ä¸�识ä¸�ã€�没有田地的农民;而达官显宦,文人å¦å£«ï¼Œåˆ™å…¨ç•™å®ˆä¸åŽŸå¼€æž�æ•£å�¶ï¼Œå› æ¤ï¼Œæ²¡ä»€ä¹ˆäº‹æƒ…æ˜¯æ–°åŠ å�¡äººå�šå¾—到而ä¸å›½äººå�šä¸�到,或没法å�å�šçš„更好ï¼�
å�¬äº†æ�Žå…‰è€€çš„“激将”言论,邓å°�平沉默ä¸�è¯ï¼Œæœªå�šè¾©è§£ï¼Œæœ‰å…³è¯�é¢˜ä¹Ÿå°±å› æ¤è€Œè½»è½»å¸¦è¿‡ã€‚但是,邓å°�平没有忘记æ�Žå…‰è€€çš„“挑战”,æ�Žå…‰è€€ä¹Ÿè¯»æ‡‚了邓å°�平的沉默。当1992å¹´é‚“å°�å¹³å�—巡时,他说è¦�å�‘æ–°åŠ å�¡å¦ä¹ ,并è¦�æ¯”æ–°åŠ å�¡å�šçš„更好
LKY in that year said that to DXP (The then chairman / leader of China until 1992 since 1978, or in the 1980s??) :
When DXP praised LKY for Singapore's major changes and building accomplishment, LKY replied: "Thank you, this is a extremely small country, very easy to manage." DXP had the same feel and sighed: "If I were need to manage, only if the size area is only as big as entire Shanghai will be so good ah!" Thus, LKY was not surprised by his comments, but instead scarsitically said: "The majority of the Singaporeans comes from China Guangdong or Fujian etc Southern province, which their ancestors are illiterate; and farmers without their own plot of land; while those high ranking officers, literate scholars, were all stayed in the central plains to wait for prosper blooming, therefore there is nothing that Singaporeans can do is something impossible for Chinese from China to do it, or having better ideas to do it."
Upon hearing to LKY's such comments, DXP did not reply, did not rebut and thus the conversation was left sliently in the history. However, DXP did not forget the "challenge" that LKY made previously, which LKY knew what his slience meant.
In 1992, when DXP travel to the South and visited Singapore, he said that he wanted to learn from Singapore, and to outperform Singapore.
教到他们那么厉害å�šä»€ä¹ˆï¼Œç‰ä¸€ä¸‹è‡ªå·±çš„å©å�没é¥å�ƒ
Originally posted by Wmyongj:�光耀当年对�/平说:
当邓å°�平对æ�Žå…‰è€€ç§°èµžæ–°åŠ å�¡çš„巨大å�˜åŒ–和建设æˆ�就时,æ�Žå…‰è€€å›žç”è¯´ï¼Œè°¢è°¢ä½ ï¼Œè¿™æ˜¯ä¸€ä¸ªé�žå¸¸å°�的国家,容易管ç�†ã€‚é‚“å°�平深有感触地说é�“,是啊,å�‡å¦‚自己è¦�管ç�†çš„,å�ªæœ‰ä¸Šæµ·è¿™ä¹ˆä¸€å�—地方多好啊ï¼�æ�Žå…‰è€€å¯¹é‚“/å°�/平的这番感å�¹ä¸�ä»¥ä¸ºç„¶ã€‚ä»–ç”¨å¸¦æœ‰å‡ åˆ†“激将”çš„å�£æ°”说é�“ï¼šæ–°åŠ å�¡äººå¤§å¤šæ•°æ˜¯ä¸å›½å¹¿ä¸œã€�ç¦�建ç‰åœ°å�—方人的å�Žè£”,祖先都是目ä¸�识ä¸�ã€�没有田地的农民;而达官显宦,文人å¦å£«ï¼Œåˆ™å…¨ç•™å®ˆä¸åŽŸå¼€æž�æ•£å�¶ï¼Œå› æ¤ï¼Œæ²¡ä»€ä¹ˆäº‹æƒ…æ˜¯æ–°åŠ å�¡äººå�šå¾—到而ä¸å›½äººå�šä¸�到,或没法å�å�šçš„更好ï¼�
å�¬äº†æ�Žå…‰è€€çš„“激将”言论,邓å°�平沉默ä¸�è¯ï¼Œæœªå�šè¾©è§£ï¼Œæœ‰å…³è¯�é¢˜ä¹Ÿå°±å› æ¤è€Œè½»è½»å¸¦è¿‡ã€‚但是,邓å°�平没有忘记æ�Žå…‰è€€çš„“挑战”,æ�Žå…‰è€€ä¹Ÿè¯»æ‡‚了邓å°�平的沉默。当1992å¹´é‚“å°�å¹³å�—巡时,他说è¦�å�‘æ–°åŠ å�¡å¦ä¹ ,并è¦�æ¯”æ–°åŠ å�¡å�šçš„更好
广东ã€�ç¦�建ç‰åœ°å�—方人的å�Žè£”,祖先都是目ä¸�识ä¸�???
Hairy Lee don't know Chinese history lah! If not for the �方人, they still have pigtail with them now. 是�方人��命推翻满清的。�����一次推翻共产党?
站在矮仔��都这么自�,�是por LP, 是什么?
Originally posted by TehJarVu:教到他们那么厉害å�šä»€ä¹ˆï¼Œç‰ä¸€ä¸‹è‡ªå·±çš„å©å�没é¥å�ƒ
At least can get beautiful and more sweeter PRC gals?
what LKY say is true. most of our ancestors are illiterate.
Originally posted by Samuel Lee:LKY in that year said that to DXP (The then chairman / leader of China until 1992 since 1978, or in the 1980s??) :
When DXP praised LKY for Singapore's major changes and building accomplishment, LKY replied: "Thank you, this is a extremely small country, very easy to manage." DXP had the same feel and sighed: "If I were need to manage, only if the size area is only as big as entire Shanghai will be so good ah!" Thus, LKY was not surprised by his comments, but instead scarsitically said: "The majority of the Singaporeans comes from China Guangdong or Fujian etc Southern province, which their ancestors are illiterate; and farmers without their own plot of land; while those high ranking officers, literate scholars, were all stayed in the central plains to wait for prosper blooming, therefore there is nothing that Singaporeans can do is something impossible for Chinese from China to do it, or having better ideas to do it."
Upon hearing to LKY's such comments, DXP did not reply, did not rebut and thus the conversation was left sliently in the history. However, DXP did not forget the "challenge" that LKY made previously, which LKY knew what his slience meant.
In 1992, when DXP travel to the South and visited Singapore, he said that he wanted to learn from Singapore, and to outperform Singapore.
yeah and now our elites are doing exactly the same thing.
stayed in the central plains to wait for prosper blooming,
for our malay and indian friends
Lee Kuan Yew to small/said evenly in the past: When Deng Xiaoping to Lee Kuan Yew commended when Singapore's immense changes and construction achievement, Lee Kuan Yew replied that thanks you, this is a very small country, easy to manage. Deng Xiaoping has deep feeling said that, if must manage, only then a Shanghai place is such good! Lee Kuan Yew thinks otherwise to the Deng/small/even this sigh. He uses to have several points “prod” the tone saying:The Singaporean person majority is places southerner's the such as the Chinese Guangdong, Fujian descendants, the ancestors is illiterate, does not have the paddies farmer; But high and influential officials, scholar, then all remains behind to take care of things the area south of Yellow River to open to disperse the leaf, therefore, any matter has not been the Singaporean person can achieve, but the Chinese cannot achieve, or does not have the method to do is better! Listened to Lee Kuan Yew “to prod” the opinion, Deng Xiaoping to be silent, has not made the argument, related topic also therefore and has brought gently. But, Deng Xiaoping had not forgotten that Lee Kuan Yew “the challenge”, Lee Kuan Yew has also spelled over Deng Xiaoping's silence. When in 1992 Deng Xiaoping southern tour, he said that must study to Singapore, and must do Singapore is better than
Originally posted by Not4rent:for our malay and indian friends
Lee Kuan Yew to small/said evenly in the past: When Deng Xiaoping to Lee Kuan Yew commended when Singapore's immense changes and construction achievement, Lee Kuan Yew replied that thanks you, this is a very small country, easy to manage. Deng Xiaoping has deep feeling said that, if must manage, only then a Shanghai place is such good! Lee Kuan Yew thinks otherwise to the Deng/small/even this sigh. He uses to have several points “prod” the tone saying:The Singaporean person majority is places southerner's the such as the Chinese Guangdong, Fujian descendants, the ancestors is illiterate, does not have the paddies farmer; But high and influential officials, scholar, then all remains behind to take care of things the area south of Yellow River to open to disperse the leaf, therefore, any matter has not been the Singaporean person can achieve, but the Chinese cannot achieve, or does not have the method to do is better! Listened to Lee Kuan Yew “to prod” the opinion, Deng Xiaoping to be silent, has not made the argument, related topic also therefore and has brought gently. But, Deng Xiaoping had not forgotten that Lee Kuan Yew “the challenge”, Lee Kuan Yew has also spelled over Deng Xiaoping's silence. When in 1992 Deng Xiaoping southern tour, he said that must study to Singapore, and must do Singapore is better than
In vocabularly and grammar wise, it is better than my first draft, but it is not without errors.
Correct version should be:
In the past, Lee Kuan Yew said to Xiaoping: When Deng Xiaoping to Lee Kuan Yew commended when Singapore's immense changes and construction achievement, Lee Kuan Yew replied that thanks you, this is a very small country, easy to manage. Deng Xiaoping has deep feeling said that, if I must manage, only if the place needed to manage is as big as Shanghai would be good! Lee Kuan Yew thinks otherwise to the Deng Xiaoping this sigh. He uses to have several points “prod” the tone saying: The Singaporean person majority is places southerner's the such as the Chinese Guangdong, Fujian descendants, the ancestors is illiterate, does not have the paddies farmer; But high and influential officials, scholar, then all remains behind to take care of things the area south of Yellow River to open to disperse the leaf, therefore, any matter has not been the Singaporean person can achieve, but the Chinese cannot achieve, or does not have the method to do is better! Listened to Lee Kuan Yew “to prod” the opinion, Deng Xiaoping to be silent, has not made the argument, related topic also therefore and has brought gently. But, Deng Xiaoping had not forgotten that Lee Kuan Yew “the challenge”, Lee Kuan Yew has also spelled over Deng Xiaoping's silence. When in 1992 Deng Xiaoping southern tour, he said that must study to Singapore, and must do better than Singapore.
Notes: Sometimes the Xiao Ping (�平) is separated by a dash is a deliberate censorship.......
Originally posted by Insg:广东ã€�ç¦�建ç‰åœ°å�—方人的å�Žè£”,祖先都是目ä¸�识ä¸�???
Hairy Lee don't know Chinese history lah! If not for the �方人, they still have pigtail with them now. 是�方人��命推翻满清的。�����一次推翻共产党?
站在矮仔��都这么自�,�是por LP, 是什么?
This became the PRC jokes abt Singaporean.
This joke continue..
Deng Xiaoping is not a wise politician afterall.He is the one who force his countrymen n women to only allowed to born 1 child only.And he was the one who trigger the TianAnMen square bloodshed incident in 1989.
This "dwarf" said he will be satisfied if ppl recognised his accomplishment in a 50/50 basis...But i would say his accomplishment is only 30 or 40/100.
Originally posted by Howlheje:Deng Xiaoping is not a wise politician afterall.He is the one who force his countrymen n women to only allowed to born 1 child only.And he was the one who trigger the TianAnMen square bloodshed incident in 1989.
This "dwarf" said he will be satisfied if ppl recognised his accomplishment in a 50/50 basis...But i would say his accomplishment is only 30 or 40/100.
Very subjective. Afterall, most people in Singapore does not buy the idea of communism and this is an expected answer.
Think again, Speakers Corner full of people kpkb-ing of our government let so much FTs coming in, flooding the whole country. Overpopulation is an issue here. (If not the MRT and buses will not be that squeezy compared to 1980s to 1990s)
Maybe in China, for such a big country with the most population country, it is impossible for them to claim that their country has limited talent on many areas, and therefore need a mass intake of foreginers, but could you think that if there is no limit on how many babies are borned, how about the unemployment thing? In Singapore, FTs is an issue for the depressed wages because FT are and able to willing to accept a lower wages (Apart of NS issue)? What about China? They sure bound to have depressed wages due to strong competition within Chinese. (PS: Even now, not all Uni grads who are willing to find a job = got a job within 6 months)
Sure, I am not bootlicking them. With the 1 child policy, it effectively created an unbalanced society such that many men will have to be single forever due to the lack of women in society as their parents generally preferred on males rather than females. The situation is improving, but such an errenous policy had costed an generation. Maybe, this is why an increasing of homosexuals being accepted worldwide.
As of Tian An Men Square bloodshed incident, who ask them to protest in the first place? A wise leader should have done this, instead of Gorbachev's Glasnost and Peristrokia, then we got USSR still there........
Originally posted by Howlheje:Deng Xiaoping is not a wise politician afterall.He is the one who force his countrymen n women to only allowed to born 1 child only.And he was the one who trigger the TianAnMen square bloodshed incident in 1989.
This "dwarf" said he will be satisfied if ppl recognised his accomplishment in a 50/50 basis...But i would say his accomplishment is only 30 or 40/100.
It was either implement the 1 child policy or face a population explosion that would result in social instability and starvation.
The rioters in Beijing were already attacking soldiers and policemen, hanging their corpses on lamppost and burning them. There weren't any room for negotiations anymore, the students kept demanding more everytime the government gave in.
How are you going to get rid of the PAP if you can't analyse history properly?
Originally posted by Samuel Lee:As of Tian An Men Square bloodshed incident, who ask them to protest in the first place? A wise leader should have done this, instead of Gorbachev's Glasnost and Peristrokia, then we got USSR still there........
So it's the people fault for wanting reform in the political system?
Originally posted by Stevenson101:
It was either implement the 1 child policy or face a population explosion that would result in social instability and starvation.The rioters in Beijing were already attacking soldiers and policemen, hanging their corpses on lamppost and burning them. There weren't any room for negotiations anymore, the students kept demanding more everytime the government gave in.
How are you going to get rid of the PAP if you can't analyse history properly?
The fact is the protests contained many people with varying agendas, and hence it was unclear with whom the government could negotiate, and what the exact demands of the protesters were.
Originally posted by RoyFang:So it's the people fault for wanting reform in the political system?
But I still think that at that time the country with its infancy of opening their doors outwards, doing such things would have scared off the investors etc, making the country worse. So Deng is right to oppress such demands, which is as of no priority yet.
The english translations here are atrocious.
Originally posted by Rock^Star:The english translations here are atrocious.
Different people have different way of reading it and thus with different versions. If you think you so smart, then do one for us. Thank you.
Nvm tks....I had a gd laugh reading the "direct" translations from mandarin. Vely vely singapolean ah.
Nvm tks....I had a gd laugh reading the "direct" translations from mandarin. Vely vely singapolean ah.
Originally posted by Samuel Lee:As of Tian An Men Square bloodshed incident, who ask them to protest in the first place? A wise leader should have done this, instead of Gorbachev's Glasnost and Peristrokia, then we got USSR still there........
A wise leader should not have caused bloodshed in a peaceful protest in the first place,he should seek a peaceful resolution.