Originally posted by Atobe:
Amazing that one can begin with a sweeping statement that claims - "Singapore is stuck in massive techno-economical jam" - and that the causes are (1) - "it doen't got guts to implement new tech"; and (2) - "the people expects spoon-feeding in learning new tech".Firstly, who is in charge of Singapore to have caused this "massive techno-economical jam" ?
Secondly, does it takes any "guts to implement new tech" - or does it take entrepreneurial vision and business acumen to chart new directions ?
Thirdly, how did the stupendous conclusion come about that it is "the people expects spoon-feeding in learning new tech" ?
Was it not due to the lack of "guts to implement new tech" to cause the "massive techno-economical jam" in the first place ?
Should the people make the first move to learn new tech - when there is no "guts to implement new tech" ?
After the economic downturn or crash of 1987, 1997, and again during 2002 through 2004 - a total of three Economic Review Committees were formed, and each of this Committee had made recommendations to reduce the huge amounts of contributions to the personal accounts in the CPF, so as to release the entrepreneurial energy to make Singapore less dependent on the big corporations, and have a second tier economic-industrial network that will provide employment for the majority.
Singapore's economy although seemingly a capitalist model - is no better then a modified form of 'command economy' with direct government policy interference in determining national economic directions - that see the government hand moving resources into directions that it sees as the future.
The government involvement get even deeper when it participate in direct competition in the market place of entrepreneurs, by using public money to set up Government-Linked Companies to compete with private entrepreneurs.
Can the government be successful entrepreneurs ?
Are Singaporeans unwilling to learn new tech ?
Or has it not been a fact that the PAP Government treat Singaporeans as human resource - to be manipulated and directed into directions that will meet with the vision and goals set up by the Government ?
How often has it been said by applicants to the various tertiary institutions that the course that they applied for had insufficient seats available, but there was an unusual large number in another faculty to produce "the manpower needed by industry" ?
If Singaporeans need spoon-feeding - does the commentator count itself to be a Singaporean - and similarly need to be spoon fed to see the situation that is so clearly obvious ?
Hey A Turdie from Turdistan, what do you know about Singapore?
Singaporeans are afraid of new technology? How we know? Simple, anything we talk about genetics and cloning, religious groups that tries to represent all singaporeans make known their complaints.
Yes, Singapore is a command economy, in part due to government control and fear of religious groups.
Aturdie is spoonfeeding false information to confuse and obstruct the progress of the Singaporean society.
The only pillar of TDP that still pass is the Civil Defence pillar.
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:Hey A Turdie from Turdistan, what do you know about Singapore?
Singaporeans are afraid of new technology? How we know? Simple, anything we talk about genetics and cloning, religious groups that tries to represent all singaporeans make known their complaints.
Yes, Singapore is a command economy, in part due to government control and fear of religious groups.
Aturdie is spoonfeeding false information to confuse and obstruct the progress of the Singaporean society.
Brilliant "zwei-siao-ness" at its best can only be seen in the claim by the "zwei-siao-Hog" that Singapore is a Command Economy.
How did the "zwei-siao-Hog" arrive at its position that a "Command Economy" state is due to the PAP "government control and fear of religious groups" ?
Does the PAP government need to fear any religious groups ?
Does its fear of religious groups drive the PAP government to have total control and dictate a "Command Economy" ?
The laughable political views of the resident "zwei-siao-Hog" is made more comical as it struts around to hawk its pseudo-knowledge and to continue with its "zwei-siao" bankrupt acts of plagiarism.
Is "new technology" only about "genetics and cloning" ?
Surely, the "zwei-siao-Hog" with its limited knowledge about "new technology" can only know best with its own effort to clone itself from the genetical ashes of Hitler - as it struts around with a pseudo-Bavarian moniker.
Spoon feeding ?
The bankrupt mind of a "zwei-siao-Hog" can only plagiarize words and ideas in its vain effort to turn the tables on others - when it cannot substantiate its hollow "zwei-siao" derogatory claim that Singaporean "people expects spoon-feeding".
‘Hey, fucker of your own mother,’ (*1) you are in safer ground if you remain in your accomplished role as a ‘mother fucker’ (*2) instead of attempting to strut your pseudo economic knowledge.
singapores TOTAL DEFENCE is a JOKE!A FAIRY TALE!!A DAMN LIE!IT DOESNT EXIST ANYMORE!
ITS MORE LIKE TOTALLED DEFENCE!
Total defence from what? Already invaded by foreigners already! Thanks to the Gahment's liberal immigration policy, they've made NS look like a stupid waste of time. You finish NS to find that your university place and jobs had been taken by some Third World rejects.
wat total defence!!
army own me money
dn pay back
still ask me to sarport
total defence!!
What total defence??? to many of them, the best defence is to buy toto and hope for the best.
Originally posted by Rovingswordsman:Total defence from what? Already invaded by foreigners already! Thanks to the Gahment's liberal immigration policy, they've made NS look like a stupid waste of time. You finish NS to find that your university place and jobs had been taken by some Third World rejects.
Total defence for the foreigners, Kill the Singaporeans!!!
Originally posted by angel7030:
Total defence for the foreigners, Kill the Singaporeans!!!
The agenda of the Taiwanese 'hum' is obvious to disrupt the SgForum with its low level frivolous idiocy.
It is obvious that the moderators have given Taiwanese 'hum' a "carte blanche" to disrupt as it pleases with its idiocy and without any intervention.
How did the Taiwanese 'hum' manage to post two replies at the same time when there is a 30 second bar between postings ?
S’poreans must not create an image that new immigrants are n - 04 Apr ’10 –10.53AM
Undersea nuke power plant in SG southern islands – 04 Apr ’10 – 10.53AM
It is not a surprise that the Taiwan 'hum' will continue to agitate by flapping its ‘Labia Majora’ and ‘Labia Minora’ to taunt in total idiocy - ‘hahaha..now u know who i am hor...the special one.’ (*1)
The agenda of a Taiwanese 'hum' in this SgForum was clearly stated by itself - ‘to make sure the audience moving/divert toward you’ (*2)
Is it any surprise to see that the efforts of the resident CBM here is obviously to sabotage the thread with its flippant and irrelevant replies, and get all attempts at serious discussion to be driven off track - simply to bring attention to its own stupidity ?
With its brain stuck between its ‘Labia Majora’ and ‘Labia Minora’ - and a brain no bigger then the size of its ‘clitoris’ - all it can do is to flap in rapturous idiocy to attract attention to itself as an 'Attention Seeking Whore' fitted with a world class CBM.
