Just heard from someone in the radio industry that govt scholars are planted in CNA. Top newscasters down the years have gone on to other news stations like Al-jazeera, CNBC etc.
I have seen CNA news as far as China, Indo and Pakistan, tks to satellite technology. And they all seem to make Singapore look good from the outside-in view.
And do you know in Asean, which country do not buy CNA? Why?
pls go on.
I watch CNA from Heilongjian PRC every morning, they are entertaining, informative and objective. No problem. Last night they report the opposition and PAP MP in parliament, I think the perspective is ok.
Originally posted by Wmyongj:I watch CNA from Heilongjian PRC every morning, they are entertaining, informative and objective. No problem. Last night they report the opposition and PAP MP in parliament, I think the perspective is ok.
The CNA report showed WP MP criticising the government decision to raise foreign workers levy, and so did some PAP MPs also being as critical or mildly concerned.
Yet, in the typical PAP arrogance of refusing to accept any critiical statements from the Opposition - an unknown PAP MP will be shown to ridicule the criticism from the WP MP, and will not show if WP MP had given a rejoinder, leaving the image of the PAP criticism being more valid.
Was that balance reporting ?
That's exactly how they reported it in words on the CNA website. The usual tactic is print the opposition's version and then the "oh so valid" rebuttal by PAP...then The End.
Originally posted by Rock^Star:pls go on.
Malaysia, our nearest neighbourhood, as to why? Even i go KL on top 5 to 6 stars hotel, i cannot get CNA. Because they dun allow qualified malaysian to work in certain position in CNA.
The Taiwanese 'hum' can pretend to be a Singaporean, can it pretend to be a Malaysian too ?
Obviously, the Taiwanese 'hum' remains to be a foreigner and will not know the deep rivalry between the Malaysian and Singaporean Governments despite all the niceties displayed superficially.
CNA is a Singapore Government owned mouth piece - has it anything to do with qualified Malaysian working in CNA ?
There are many Malaysian Chinese who found stardom in the movies made by Media Corp and its affiliated companies - and these Singapore made movies are shown on private TV channels in Malaysia.
What is the Taiwanese 'hum' attempting to cook up when all it does best is to 'Talk Cock and Sing Idoitic Songs in praise of the PAP' ?
This is another daily routine display of idiocy and irrelevance of the Taiwanese 'hum' to exercise its ‘Labia Majora’ and ‘Labia Minora’ - simply to attract attention to itself as the resident 'Attention Seeking Whore'.
Originally posted by Atobe:
The Taiwanese 'hum' can pretend to be a Singaporean, can it pretend to be a Malaysian too ?
Obviously, the Taiwanese 'hum' remains to be a foreigner and will not know the deep rivalry between the Malaysian and Singaporean Governments despite all the niceties displayed superficially.
CNA is a Singapore Government owned mouth piece - has it anything to do with qualified Malaysian working in CNA ?
There are many Malaysian Chinese who found stardom in the movies made by Media Corp and its affiliated companies - and these Singapore made movies are shown on private TV channels in Malaysia.
What is the Taiwanese 'hum' attempting to cook up when all it does best is to 'Talk Cock and Sing Idoitic Songs in praise of the PAP' ?
This is another daily routine display of idiocy and irrelevance of the Taiwanese 'hum' to exercise its ‘Labia Majora’ and ‘Labia Minora’ - simply to attract attention to itself as the resident 'Attention Seeking Whore'.
CNA got scholars inside, there is a purpose of CNA, it is also a political tool to flavor china and countries in Asia that co operate with Singapore, malaysian are smart people, unlike that mediacorp only for movies and some stupid shows, CNA plays an important roles in the political arena of Asia, for that reason, Malaysian are not allowed, and that get the Ministers of Malaysia frustrated and ban it altogether.
Originally posted by angel7030:CNA got scholars inside, there is a purpose of CNA, it is also a political tool to flavor china and countries in Asia that co operate with Singapore, malaysian are smart people, unlike that mediacorp only for movies and some stupid shows, CNA plays an important roles in the political arena of Asia, for that reason, Malaysian are not allowed, and that get the Ministers of Malaysia frustrated and ban it altogether.
When the Taiwanese 'hum' is ignorant and stoooopid - it performs best as a 'hum'
This is another daily routine display of idiocy and irrelevance of the Taiwanese 'hum' to exercise its ‘Labia Majora’ and ‘Labia Minora’ - simply to attract attention to itself as the resident 'Attention Seeking Whore'.
A very learned friend was a participant in an IRC discussion.
The IRC discussion was about the local political scene purportedly mandating paper qualifications for credible candidature. I was told that a lot of good arguments were thrown up and they are in short summarized hereinbelow.
I have reproduced these with the kind permission of the author, which until he tells me that he does not mind being named, i shall not name him
1. Having paper qualifications has little to do with integrity.
2. Political education and savviness is not usually formally taught.
3. Not having paper qualifications does not mean a person does not have an education i.e. he can be self taught
4. There is also the question of who should decide what the formal criteria for the eligibility of candidates ought to be.
5. The requirement of paper qualifcations for candidates reserves the right to rule to the upper classes, which will entrench themselves and therefore undemocratic.
6. Politicians, even ministers, always have a team of specialists which they can consult. It’s more important to look at the qualifications of that team.
7. In a system where money has incredible corrupting influence, politicians must above all have backbone, not simply paper qualifications.
8. The quality of candidates should be judged by the people, not by some institution (schools).
9. Candidates with paper qualifications is a bonus, if they are one with the citizenry, they will be elected anyway and hence no requirements for paper qualifications are necessary
10. Having an educated electorate is the priority, not highly educated candidates per se. This leads to a more sustainable political system.
11. Putting point 4 and 9 together, mandating paper qualifications creates an aristocracy/dictatorship that will dumb down the public to maintain their grip on power. This is unsustainable.
http://chiatilik.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/what-political-candidates-should-have/
Nothing surprising. CNA is very pro incumbent.
It is almost like an extension of the local media despite their tagline of giving "asian perspectives" in reporting.
you notice they show alot about China, and the food in China, it seem like wanting to get us to know china more and get ready for china to take over CNA
ever wonder why CNA does not broadcast outside of Asia?
Originally posted by Arapahoe:ever wonder why CNA does not broadcast outside of Asia?
Will be hit by those international media CNN , BCC
Originally posted by hundydude:
Will be hit by those international media CNN , BCC
the biggerest problems our news are being filtered so when you bring up competitive reporting informations are limited....while others have the resources and base on viewer's interest and demographics to focus on content report. Which is ashamed because CNA has a lot of decent english speaking reporters that western viewers can understand.
Originally posted by Arapahoe:
the biggerest problems our news are being filtered so when you bring up competitive reporting informations are limited....while others have the resources and base on viewer's interest and demographics to focus on content report. Which is ashamed because CNA has a lot of decent english speaking reporters that western viewers can understand.
Understandable, CNA is under state control.
Do they have two version of CNA, one for sat and the other is one you see in Spore?