Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:
honestly, even if by neutral party, how can we ensure they wont fall for bribes on either side?as TS stated, we cant 100% trust anyone... so how?
You need an impartial Justice system if either party claims that the election is rigged, something which is lacking.
That's what happened in the US when there were issues with the votes regarding Bush. It was also judged in the courts in Pakistan regarding Musharaff. If the Justice system is a kangaroo court, you can rest assured that you will lose the case even if you are right.
When the case is judged in the courts, the public is allowed free access to the judgement and trial. If the public finds that grievious wrong has been done, they can usually take to the streets to protest the judgement, but then again, we can't protest here.
Who knows, maybe they will lock you up in a ballroom and let everybody protest with doors closed.
Originally posted by Chew Bakar:Are you saying they will rig it?
I dont think they dare to do it.
The world is watching pap.
Originally posted by βÎτά:
You need an impartial Justice system if either party claims that the election is rigged, something which is lacking.
That's what happened in the US when there were issues with the votes regarding Bush. It was also judged in the courts in Pakistan regarding Musharaff. If the Justice system is a kangaroo court, you can rest assured that you will lose the case even if you are right.
When the case is judged in the courts, the public is allowed free access to the judgement and trial. If the public finds that grievious wrong has been done, they can usually take to the streets to protest the judgement, but then again, we can't protest here.
ah... how can u ensure the justice system will be impartial and not taking sides?
Originally posted by likeyou:
I dont think they dare to do it.The world is watching pap.
The world won't care, if they can get billions in investments.
Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:
ah... how can u ensure the justice system will be impartial and not taking sides?
Like I said, the entire proceedings will be watched by the public. If the public does not agree with the judgement, they can protest in the streets. The rule of democracy is a rule by the people, not by one or two persons.
Originally posted by Chew Bakar:The world won't care, if they can get billions in investments.
Yeah, sound logical to say that.
I
Originally posted by Chew Bakar:The world won't care, if they can get billions in investments.
agree.
Originally posted by βÎτά:
Like I said, the entire proceedings will be watched by the public. If the public does not agree with the judgement, they can protest in the streets. The rule of democracy is a rule by the people, not by one or two persons.
ahh... if the people of the country split into 2 factions how? half say yes, half say no? even if not half, 25% of the country population is enuff to ensure the country goes down...
Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:ahh... if the people of the country split into 2 factions how? half say yes, half say no? even if not half, 25% of the country population is enuff to ensure the country goes down...
you sure
if like that, better just one party enough
no need to hold election
Originally posted by AH TRUTH:
you sureif like that, better just one party enough
no need to hold election
Monarchy the best. no need voting. just kidding
Originally posted by AH TRUTH:
you sureif like that, better just one party enough
no need to hold election
lol? wat u mean i sure?
different people will have different opinion... it does not mean 1 whole country sure 1 thinking de... problem is how to please everyone?
Originally posted by Fantagf:
Monarchy the best. no need voting. just kidding
well according to some, we are under monarchy~
Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:
lol? wat u mean i sure?different people will have different opinion... it does not mean 1 whole country sure 1 thinking de... problem is how to please everyone?
not possible to please everyone. Just base on the majority.
Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:
well according to some, we are under monarchy~
sh shshsh, hush hush
Well, I wouldn't say it's rigged but rather than lack of opposition.
Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:
ahh... i understand ur point... but u shld focus on media then... the way u put it, u're saying religion could be a lie, history could be a lie, everything could be a lie...
you got that right...................
in wars, the victors will re-write history so they're the good guys who won............
in religion, ALL the famous Roman historians + Jewish philosophers living in Jerusalem NEVER once mentioned Jesus or Christians................
most of Jesus's life events were the same as TENS of messiahs/saviours that lived way way before his time............some even by hundreds of years..................the same thing - late december birth, virgin birth, betrayed and killed, then resurrection..............so religions can be falsified
Originally posted by likeyou:
I dont think they dare to do it.The world is watching pap.
don't be naive lah...........who cares about a tiny island anyway.............LKY will do anything to stay in power............becoz if he's pushed out, the new big boss will go after him liao................it'll be another Durai case..............but thousands of times bigger............
it's like the mafia, when you're in...........you can't get out..........especially when you're the boss, all your enemies will go after you.............
Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:ahh... if the people of the country split into 2 factions how? half say yes, half say no? even if not half, 25% of the country population is enuff to ensure the country goes down...
if that's the case, then US and Europe would have been back to the stone age by now..............
Originally posted by Fantagf:
Monarchy the best. no need voting. just kidding
If monarchy can help its pple. I wont mind.
Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:ahh... if the people of the country split into 2 factions how? half say yes, half say no? even if not half, 25% of the country population is enuff to ensure the country goes down...
Your life and arguments are all based on "ifs". How likely is it that it is split exactly at the 50% mark? Means odd number of population, someone must be chop into half.
25% of opposition is enough to ensure that the country goes down? I thought there are 33.3% of oppposition votes in Singapore during the last election.
Maybe that's why Singapore is going down now and it's without the action of opposition members.
Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:
lol? wat u mean i sure?different people will have different opinion... it does not mean 1 whole country sure 1 thinking de... problem is how to please everyone?
PAP is the best, whatever direction they take, 100% of the population will support it, it's reported in the newspaper.
Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:
lol? wat u mean i sure?different people will have different opinion... it does not mean 1 whole country sure 1 thinking de... problem is how to please everyone?
Your premise is that Democracy has so many different thoughts and ideas, it's difficult to please everybody. Then I think you should suggest everybody revert back to communism. That way everybody will be contented, by force that is. You will by hook or by crook be contented, otherwise you will be sent to the paddyfields for 改�.
Originally posted by βÎτά:
PAP is the best, whatever direction they take, 100% of the population will support it, it's reported in the newspaper.
Is it?
Originally posted by tarutaru:Well, I wouldn't say it's rigged but rather than lack of opposition.
Yeah, our oppositon is far too few to take on pop.