Is Singapore a 'corporatist' country?
-
Can someone describe the corporatist 'political' structure of Singapore?
-
The Economic System of Corporatism
In the last half of the 19th century people of the working class in Europe were beginning to show interest in the ideas of socialism and syndicalism. Some members of the intelligentsia, particularly the Catholic intelligentsia, decided to formulate an alternative to socialism which would emphasize social justice without the radical solution of the abolition of private property. The result was called Corporatism. The name had nothing to do with the notion of a business corporation except that both words are derived from the Latin word for body, corpus.
The basic idea of corporatism is that the society and economy of a country should be organized into major interest groups (sometimes called corporations) and representatives of those interest groups settle any problems through negotiation and joint agreement. In contrast to a market economy which operates through competition a corporate economic works through collective bargaining. The American president Lyndon Johnson had a favorite phrase that reflected the spirit of corporatism. He would gather the parties to some dispute and say, "Let us reason together."
Under corporatism the labor force and management in an industry belong to an industrial organization. The representatives of labor and management settle wage issues through collective negotiation. While this was the theory in practice the corporatist states were largely ruled according to the dictates of the supreme leader.
One early and important theorist of corporatism was Adam Müller, an advisor to Prince Metternich in what is now eastern Germany and Austria. Müller propounded his views as an antidote to the twin dangers of the egalitarianism of the French Revolution and the laissez faire economics of Adam Smith. In Germany and elsewhere there was a distinct aversion among rulers to allow markets to function without direction or control by the state. The general culture heritage of Europe from the medieval era was opposed to individual self-interest and the free operation of markets. Markets and private property were acceptable only as long as social regulation took precedence over such sinfull motivations as greed.
Coupled with the anti-market sentiments of the medieval culture there was the notion that the rulers of the state had a vital role in promoting social justice. Thus corporatism was formulated as a system that emphasized the postive role of the state in guaranteeing social justice and suppressing the moral and social chaos of the population pursuing their own individual self-interests. And above all else, as a political economic philosophy corporatism was flexible. It could tolerate private enterprise within limits and justify major projects of the state. Corporatism has sometimes been labeled as a Third Way or a mixed economy, a synthesis of capitalism and socialism, but it is in fact a separate, distinctive political economic system.
Although rulers have probably operated according to the principles of corporatism from time immemorial it was only in the early twentieth century that regimes began to identify themselves as corporatist. The table below gives some of those explicitly corporatist regimes.
Corporatist Regimes of
the Early Twentieth CenturySystem Name Country Period Leader National Corporatism Italy 1922-1945 Benito Mussolini Country, Religion, Monarchy Spain 1923-1930 Miguel Primo de Rivera National Socialism Germany 1933-1945 Adolph Hitler National Syndicalism Spain 1936-1973 Francisco Franco New State Portugal 1932-1968 Antonio Salazar New State Brazil 1933-1945 Getulio Vargas New Deal United States 1933-1945 Franklin Roosevelt Third
Hellenic
CivilizationGreece 1936-1941 Ioannis Metaxas Justice Party Argentina 1943-1955 Juan Peron In the above table several of the regimes were brutal, totalitarian dictatorships, usually labeled fascist, but not all the regimes that had a corporatist foundation were fascist. In particular, the Roosevelt New Deal despite its many faults could not be described as fascist. But definitely the New Deal was corporatist. The architect for the initial New Deal program was General Hugh Johnson. Johnson had been the administrator of the military mobilization program for the U.S. under Woodrow Wilson during World War I. It was felt that he did a good job of managing the economy during that period and that is why he was given major responsibility for formulating an economic program to deal with the severe problems of the Depression. But between the end of World War I and 1933 Hugh Johnson had become an admirer of Mussolini's National Corporatist system in Italy and he drew upon the Italian experience in formulating the New Deal. It should be noted that many elements of the early New Deal were later declared unconstitutional and abandoned, but some elements such as the National Labor Relations Act which promoted unionization of the American labor force are still in effect. One part of the New Deal was the development of the Tennessee River Valley under the public corporation called the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). Some of the New Dealer saw TVA as more than a public power enterprise. They hoped to make TVA a model for the creation of regional political units which would replace state governments. Their goal was not realized. The model for TVA was the river development schemes carried out in Spain in the 1920's under the government of Miguel Primo de Rivera. Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera, the son of Miguel Primo de Rivera, was the founder of Franco's National Syndicalism.
Corporatist regime typically promote large governmental projects such as TVA on the basis that they are too large to be funded by private enterprise. In Brazil the Vargas regime created many public enterprises such as in iron and steel production which it felt were needed but private enterprise declined to create. It also created an organized labor movement that came to control those public enterprises and turned them into overstaffed, inefficient drains on the public budget.
Although the above locates the origin of corporatism in 19th century France it roots can be traced much further back in time. Sylvia Ann Hewlett in her book, The Cruel Dilemmas of Development: Twentieth Century Brazil, says,
Corporatism is based on a body of ideas that can be traced through Aristotle, Roman law, medieval social and legal structures, and into contemporary Catholic social philosophy. These ideas are based on the premise that man's nature can only be fulfilled within a political community.
..........
The central core of the corporatist vision is thus not the individual but the political community whose perfection allows the individual members to fulfill themselves and find happiness.
...............
The state in the corporatist tradition is thus clearly interventionist and powerful.Corporatism is collectivist; it is a different version of collectivism than socialism but it is definitely collectivist. It places some importance on the fact that private property is not nationalized, but the control through regulation is just as real. It is de facto nationalization without being de jure nationalization.
Although Corporatism is not a familiar concept to the general public, most of the economies of the world are corporatist in nature. The categories of socialist and pure market economy are virtually empty. There are only corporatist economies of various flavors.
These flavors of corporatism include the social democratic regimes of Europe and the Americas, but also the East Asian and Islamic fundamentalist regimes such as Taiwan, Singapore and Iran. The Islamic socialist states such as Syria, Libya and Algeria are more corporatist than socialist, as was Iraq under Saddam Hussain. The formerly communist regimes such as Russia and China are now clearly corporatist in economic philosphy although not in name.
-
What a long post! Don't think many will read it.
-
Originally posted by Fantagf:
What a long post! Don't think many will read it.
this 2 person maybe same same....
-
Originally posted by Arapahoe:
this 2 person maybe same same....
Possible -
Thank you zetreyier. But I would like to know how corporatism is practiced in actuality in Singapore. How is the corporatist model applied in the political 'layout' of Singapore? If you know a lot about this, or anyone, I will be asking a lot of questions because I really want to understand how it works.
Let's start with politics.
1.What composes the Singapore parliament? How are they chosen or elected? Do you have corporative chambers? What are they called.
-
Originally posted by Longbeforenoon:
Thank you zetreyier. But I would like to know how corporatism is practiced in actuality in Singapore. How is the corporatist model applied in the political 'layout' of Singapore? If you know a lot about this, or anyone, I will be asking a lot of questions because I really want to understand how it works.
Let's start with politics.
1.What composes the Singapore parliament? How are they chosen or elected? Do you have corporative chambers? What are they called.
Singapore politics is easy. One party PAP controls everything. The party is controlled by Lee family.
The people have no influence whatsoever on anything.
That's the summary of Singapore politics.
What composes the Singapore parliament? How are they chosen or elected? Do you have corporative chambers? What are they called.
Singapore parliament is basically for show.
All the MPs are chosen and controlled by the inner clique CEC of PAP.
Their main job is to make a show for foreigners and locals to see.
-
So can you say it's a pseudo corporatism because the MP's are appointed, not elected by members of the corporation? What does each MP represent, a geographical area, or some segments of (business) industry, or something else, or a combination of all?
-
Originally posted by Longbeforenoon:
So can you say it's a pseudo corporatism because the MP's are appointed, not elected by members of the corporation? What does each MP represent, a geographical area, or some segments of (business) industry, or something else, or a combination of all?
Youth PeeHappy. -
Originally posted by Longbeforenoon:
So can you say it's a pseudo corporatism because the MP's are appointed, not elected by members of the corporation?
I don't think there is corporatism in Singapore according to below definition:
The basic idea of corporatism is that the society and economy of a country should be organized into major interest groups (sometimes called corporations) and representatives of those interest groups settle any problems through negotiation and joint agreement.
According to some scholars, there had never been any form of state organised under the concept of corporatism in 20th century, because in theory, workers and owners, managers of capital are supposed to "work" things out in a fair way, negotiate terms among themselves. Everybody happy.
In practice, it's always the state gang up with business to crush the workers.
Your concept of "corporatism" seems to be a state dominated by interests of business corporations. That's a different story already. That's a typical oligarchy you find in latin america.
-
You'll fail your paper if you submit stuff posted here
-
Originally posted by kramnave:
You'll fail your paper if you submit stuff posted here
Don't say fail, ISD may even open a file on you.
-
Originally posted by Fantagf:
Possible
At first I thought it was Poh Ah Piak looking to get Piak ! but yes prolly the same person with the long long wall of text. -
Why this Poh Ah Piak so notorious? What did he do?