January 15, 2010
Foreign Minister George Yeo is one of the few PAP ministers and MPs to maintain a Facebook to reach out to ordinary Singaporeans, but it appears that he is more interested to boast about his frequent overseas trips and meetings with foreign dignitaries than to listen to the genuine concerns of Singaporeans on his Facebook.
An irate netizen tipped us off on an exchange between George Yeo and a young lady by the name of Miss Ang on 11 January 2010:
[Source: George Yeo's Facebook, 11 January 2010 ]
Miss Ang reported a case of molest in November last year to the police and has not received a reply from them yet.
Out of desperation, she asked Mr Yeo (and other people) on his Facebook for assistance.
Instead of showing some empathy to the victim, Mr Yeo gave a curt reply in a one-liner:
“Please see your MP.”
Miss Ang did not bother to continue the conversation and rightly so.
Put yourself in the position of the victim. You were badly affected, hurt and traumatized by the incident and after nearly two months you made a police report, there is still no reply from the police officer investigating your complaint who promised to call you. You feel dejected, helpless and lost and not knowing where to seek help, you post a comment on a minister’s Facebook hoping that somehow he will be able to help you and this is the answer you get from him without a single word of consolation as if you do not exist. How will you feel?
Miss Ang had already indicated that she is “at a loss of what to do” when she was typing the comment. Any decent fellow human being would have offered some words of concern and support if not assistance to her, let alone an elected minister who is supposed to serve Singaporeans and take care of their interests.
Where is your empathy, Mr George Yeo? You sound as if molest is such a trivial affair that doesn’t deserve your time and attention. Your reply is absolutely disgusting, callous and insulting, an indirect way brushing Miss Ang’s concerns aside and telling her to “get lost” and stop disturbing you.
And how will Miss Ang’s MP be in a position to help her directly and immediately other than to write a letter to the police to ask them to expedite their investigations?
As the highest paid Foreign Affairs Minister in the world, it is appalling that Mr Yeo failed to comprehend the simple meaning of empathy – to put oneself in the shoes of others, to understand how they are feeling and most importantly, to show that you CARE.
Miss Ang is not really expecting you to help her as she even apologized in her comment that she is “sorry” if she is using the “wrong channel” to seek for help. What she needed most is a word of consolation from you and that will suffice.
You could have said something like:
“Oh dear, what happened? It must be a traumatic experience for you. Why don’t you drop me an email so that I can find out more about your problem?”
OR
“I am not really in charge of the police, but let me see if I can pull some strings and make a few phone calls to help you. Please email me and I will see what I can do for you.”
OR
“You must be feeling pretty anxious, upset and even angry right now. I am sure the police officer remembers your case, perhaps he is too busy to give you a call. Just drop me an email and I will try to contact the relevant authorities to attend to you immediately.”
Mr George Yeo, are these few simple words beyond you? Do you know what a world of difference you will make by typing any of the above sentences in your reply to Miss Ang? She will feel so much relieved, relaxed and refreshed upon hearing you, a minister in a position of power giving her a few minutes of your precious time. In fact, she may not even email you and will just wait patiently for the police officer to get back to her.
It appears that Mr Yeo has been fraternalizing too often with “higher mortals” that he has completely lost touch with “lesser mortals” like Miss Ang, you and me.
Three weeks after a fatal road traffic accident at Bukit Panjang involving a vehicle from the Romanian embassy which robbed the life of an innocent young man, he had only this to say to the families of the victims and the public:
“What happened was very bad.”
Oh, a woman lost her newly-wed husband of only one month, the culprit had fled the country and his identity remained unknown to this very day and that’s all you can say – “very bad”. What will be considered a “disaster” to you, Mr Yeo? Only when you are booted out of your office in the next general election?
To be fair to Mr Yeo, he is not the only PAP leader to be guilty of such blatant arrogance, insensitivity and callousness. The word “empathy” does not exist in the PAP’s dictionary at all as its ministers and MPs are living too high up in their own ivory towers that they are completely dissociated from the reality on the ground, to borrow the words of Law Minister Shanmugam.
In the aftermath of the fiasco involving PAP MP Denise Phua who was “threatened” by her constituent, a Singaporean by the name of Lawrence Loh wrote a letter to TODAY relating his own personal experience with a PAP MP:
“In February 2001, my older son died in a naval accident whilst serving National Service. In that year, my younger son was due for enlistment. A friend, a very active grassroots member, suggested that I approach my MP, for help in exploring the possibility of getting an exemption for my younger son. I was reluctant but he went ahead to fix an appointment for me at the Meet-The-People Session (MPS). I subsequently relented and he accompanied me there.
..
It was in March 2001. That was my first appearance at a MPS, and it was to be my last.I waited until midnight before I could meet the MP. Prior to this, he was given the case paper which detailed the objective of the meeting and the circumstances of my case.
When I entered the room, his first remark was “Yes, what can I do for you?”. There was no attempt at offering a word of sympathy or condolence.
I then related my situation and said that both my wife and I were very traumatised. His next remark was:
“What traumatic? After two months, you won’t be traumatic.”.
With that, I decided to end the meeting. And with that, my respect for him hit ground zero. I was too stunned and grief-stricken to react.”
Now back to the Denise Phua case. Her constituent, 49 year old Ng Kim Ngweng was jailed for six months for criminal intimidation when he called up the REACH hotline to complain about her attitude.
During his trial, the father of two told the juge that on the day he waited four hours to see Denise Phua, she was smiling and ‘looked proud’.
After complaining to her that the aid he got was paltry, he told her: ‘Don’t forget, you just care that you have eaten enough and don’t bother whether other people are alive or dead.’
Not only are PAP MPs known for their utter lack of empathy, even small-fry PAP members think of themselves as “mini-LKYs”. A YPAP member by the name of Eric How whose father is a prominent grassroots leader in Kampung Kembangan constituency posted a rather caustic comment on the YPAP Facebook attacking online critics of the PAP:
“Do not be bitter and go on slapping on the Government senselessly because you did not get any fruits or benefits from your forefather. You will have to blame on your karma or your forefathers for not getting all the paths right for their off springs.”
Mr How also boasted unashamedly that his “folks” get him a personal car so that he does not need to “squeeze into public transport” like other netizens:
“My folks did the right thing by getting all the stuffs ready for us and we will never ever need to nag about the Government giving jobs to foreigners instead of locals. In fact, we create jobs for others. Our folks even make sure that we guys do not need to squeeze into public transport by getting each of us a personal car.”
As if being insulted by fellow Singaporeans is not bad enough, we have one new citizen from India and YPAP member Fredric Fanthome who sneered at online critics of the PAP as “anonymous hordes who sprayed venom at the government at every single opportunity.” Wow, since when did we locals, the true, blue Singaporeans who have risked two years of our life in National Service need to be lectured by a former Indian national who is only able to come here and leech on us thanks to the PAP?
There is a Chinese saying which goes – “When the upper beam is not straight, the lower beam will be crooked”. These PAP MPs are merely emulating their seniors who treat Singaporeans as no more than “digits” in the economy which can be easily replaced by their new pets elsewhere as exemplified by this most outrageous remark to date by the PAP’s founder Lee Kuan Yew.
In a recent interview with National Geographic magazine, Lee said it is a “good idea” that Singapore has welcomed so many Chinese immigrants as they are more “hard-driving” and “hard-striving” than the locals.
“If native Singaporeans are falling behind because “the spurs are not stuck into the hide,” that is their problem,” he was quoted as saying in the article “The Singapore Solution.” by Mark Jacobson in a time when many Singaporeans are struggling to make ends meet in the face of the relentless influx of cheap foreign labor into Singapore which depresses their wages directly leading to a lower quality of life.
[Source: National Geographic]
Is empathy an important attribute of a MP? As a matter of fact, it is more important than other qualities such as intelligence, capability and passion for the job.
As public servants, ministers and MPs have the heavy responsiblity on their shoulders to formulate and implement policies which will affect the lives of millions of people on the ground. How can we expect them to take our interests into consideration when they are unable to empathize with our concerns, worries and fears?
The root cause of the problem lies in our obsolete, archaic and repressive political system which allows the PAP to parachute outsiders with little grassroots experience or interest to serve fellow Singaporeans into parliament directly either through walkovers or by hiding under the skirts of a heavy-weight minister to steam-roll over the perenially weak opposition in the elections which have become no more than a farce to masquerade Singapore as a “democracy” to the world.
One may excel academically, but that doesn’t automatically make one a good MP or minister. The ingrained elitist mindset of the PAP to select its candidates based largely on academic and professional qualifications alone coupled with the lack of a solid opposition in parliament to exert political pressure on its MPs to perform has led to the untenable situation we have today where the “great affective divide” (first coined by writer Dr Catherine Lim in 1994) between the government and the citizens is widening with each passing day to the detriment of our nation.
Singaporeans are already paying the ultimate price for the lack of empathy from the PAP leaders – we are finding ourselves increasingly being squeezed into a corner by the relentless influx of foreigners who have threatened to take away our jobs, our homes and our futures and nobody within the PAP seems to realize that.
But then again, if molest is considered a trivial matter by a minister, what makes you think they will care about our life and death?
When the next election comes, please don’t be deceived by the goodies they dangle in front of you again.
Let us recite the PAP mantra to Singaporeans starting from today:
“YOU DIE, YOUR BUSINESS!”
January 16, 2010
Singapore’s Foreign Minister George Yeo has apologized to the molest victim Miss Ang for his curt reply to her in a private message on her Facebook 10 hours after The Temasek Review broke the story, sparking a massive outcry in cyberspace. (read article here)
On 11 January 2010, Miss Ang posted a comment on Mr Yeo’s Facebook seeking help to expedite police investigations in a pending molest case. Miss Yeo had lodged a report in November last year and had yet to receive a reply from the police.
Instead of offering some words of consolation and support to her, Mr Yeo gave a one-liner reply:
“Please see your MP”.
Mr Yeo’s rather insensitive reply drew flak from netizens who lambasted him for lacking “emotional intelligence” on our article which has drawn nearly 100 comments so far.
Out-of-touch felt that Mr Yeo’s lack of empathy is reflective of the entire PAP government:
“The Govt is getting out of touch with the common people. A story is told that if you put a frog in a pan of water and slowly raise its temperature, the frog can be cooked without being aware that it is unable to feel the changes in the ambient temperature….Its not cool to act “corporate” style by short curt but efficient answers such as Mr George Yeo gave to Ms Ang. We need smart mangers, BUT leaders capable of compassion and able to show caring feelings.”
sibeidulan concurred that the reply is a bad PR move:
“Even if he’s not truly concerned, the least he could do is to be nice about it and refer the case to the Wong Cunt Sink at MHA nicely. His response is full of negativity. a bad PR move for a politician, to say the least. “PLEASE SEE YOUR MP” – I really wonder what went through his mind as he posted this on his wall.”
bochapliao felt he could have given a better answer:
“Georgie Yeo could have suggested counselling for the poor girl and all he said was go see your MP? And the police can send 3 patrol cars with about 6 policemen to issue summons to an illegal hawker at Sungei flea market as reported in Stomp ST. And no police wants to attend to this poor girl who is traumatized?”
Mr Yeo’s reply has since been deleted from his Facebook. He has just returned from a trip to Laos.
Miss Ang, the molest victim posted a comment on our site to inform readers that Mr Yeo had apologized to her in a private message on 15 January 2010 at 10.46pm, 4 days after the initial posting:
“I must also apologize to you if my original reply on FB sounded curt. Such cases are always better handled face to face, discreetly.”
She added that “this is a one off incident that does not diminish the work Mr Yeo has done for others.”
While we will give credit to Mr Yeo’s apology, it doesn’t take away the fact that he is paid by taxpayers’ monies to do his job and paid quite obscenely as well.
As Foreign Minister, Mr Yeo is paid around SGD$2 million dollars a year, more than 4 times the annual salary of U.S. President Barack Obama. It is not too much for Singaporeans who are paying his wages to expect a little bit of human decency, empathy and compassion from him.
If we had not published an article yesterday to publicize the matter to the public, Mr Yeo would never have realized his mistake.
Perhaps Mr Yeo may like to thank us for helping him brush up his PR skills so that he will be more careful when talking down to “lesser mortals” again.
maybe george yeo is a software robot in cyberspace with automatic response to questions....
i remeber a software program called dr sabaitso in old days of computers. u tell it your problems like:
me:i am hungry
drsabaitso:maybe u should do something to make u less hungry
me:i am tired
dr sabaitso: maybe u should do something to make u less tired
me:i need to masturbate
dr sabaitso: maybe u should do something to make u less need to masturbate
me:i need to throw away dr sabaitso software
dr sabaitso:maybe u should do something to make u less to need to throw away dr sabaitso software.
Originally posted by Johnreturn35:“threatened” by her constituent, a Singaporean by the name of Lawrence Loh wrote a letter to TODAY relating his own personal experience with a PAP MP:
“In February 2001, my older son died in a naval accident whilst serving National Service. In that year, my younger son was due for enlistment. A friend, a very active grassroots member, suggested that I approach my MP, for help in exploring the possibility of getting an exemption for my younger son. I was reluctant but he went ahead to fix an appointment for me at the Meet-The-People Session (MPS). I subsequently relented and he accompanied me there.
..
It was in March 2001. That was my first appearance at a MPS, and it was to be my last.I waited until midnight before I could meet the MP. Prior to this, he was given the case paper which detailed the objective of the meeting and the circumstances of my case.When I entered the room, his first remark was “Yes, what can I do for you?”. There was no attempt at offering a word of sympathy or condolence.
I then related my situation and said that both my wife and I were very traumatised. His next remark was:
“What traumatic? After two months, you won’t be traumatic.”.
With that, I decided to end the meeting. And with that, my respect for him hit ground zero. I was too stunned and grief-stricken to react.”
The guy who lost his son in NS...
...the reply from the MP was totally so unacceptable.
But I shall refrain from saying anymore. The forum is, afterall, a 'open space'...dun wanna be charged for being 'threatening'
Sigh...how can the leaders of Singapore be devoid of basic compassion for another being's plight?
C'mon,George you didn't really mean it,did you? when you uttered those words.
You'd really wanted to help that "girl",didn't you? but you'd really screwed up!George.
Are all the Ministers/PAP MPs so stereo typed?If so,lets get them out!
So what?So they(PAP) say.We'll get by eventhough we'll lose some votes to the oppositions but we(PAP) do not fret over it too much as we(PAP) know Singaporeans need PAP as in the past 40+ years.Vote in the oppositions at your own perils and do not blame PAP for that and not warning you-this is the fear they already planted in the minds of too many softie Singaporeans.
yeo attitude is just like my manager.
Uncaring, no feeling and not a human.
Please carry on here. Thanks!