HK public rental housing Mickey Mouse flat:4 persons , 50 m2
-
Hi guys. Long time no talk lah.
May i share with u the very small size of HK public rental housing. Curretly,
abt 2 million HK people still stay in public rental housing--PRH.
http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr06-07/english/panels/hg/papers/hg0305cb1-1012-3-e.pdf
re page 4 and 1
The average living space
of public housing tenants has increased substantially from
6.9 sq. m per person in 1986 to 12.1 sq. m per person in 2006,
representing a 75% increase in the allocated space.Household..........PRH flats in Tin,Shui Wai and Tung ChungFloor Area size （Square ..................................Metres）flats built after 1992
1 person-----17.8
2 persons-----30.4
3 persons-------39.7----(abt Spore 1 room flat)
4 persons------49.1
5 persons-----52.3
6 persons--------54.25---(abt 2 rrom flat)(note spore HDB 3 room flat abt 65 m2, with 2 bedrrom and 1 to 2 toilets)
public rental housing--PRH.
FYI--population and land area,2008HK 7 million--1100 km2
SG 5 million--704 km2
-
At least they have build PRH for single.
-
lionnoisy, why you support PAP?
So you are going to vote PAP in 2010 elections?
-
Originally posted by angel3070:
lionnoisy, why you support PAP?
So you are going to vote PAP in 2010 elections?
No, he supports opposition.
Reverse psychology in making countries like Australia and HK "look" bad.
-
Originally posted by charlize:
No, he supports opposition.
If lionnoisy is sincere in supporting opposition, I think he should stop making threads defending PAP govt.
-
Originally posted by angel3070:
If lionnoisy is sincere in supporting opposition, I think he should stop making threads defending PAP govt.
Some people do things differently mah.
-
Originally posted by lionnoisy:
Hi guys. Long time no talk lah.
May i share with u the very small size of HK public rental housing. Curretly,
abt 2 million HK people still stay in public rental housing--PRH.
http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr06-07/english/panels/hg/papers/hg0305cb1-1012-3-e.pdf
re page 4 and 1
(note spore HDB 3 room flat abt 65 m2, with 2 bedrrom and 1 to 2 toilets)
public rental housing--PRH.
FYI--population and land area,2008HK 7 million--1100 km2
SG 5 million--704 km2
It's best before you make stupid posts (but you make them anyway 100% of the time), to check your facts right.
For example, how much does a public housing in SG cost, when HK is rental and is not expensive?
Just one stupid superficial comparison from you, and you waste a space in this forum
HK public housing and SG public housing schemes are VERY DIFFERENT, aside from sharing the word "public"
-
"HK public housing and SG public housing schemes are VERY DIFFERENT, aside from sharing the word "public""
HK rental housing dept staff also very different from HDB? If u ask HDB staff this they can assume that u r asking that and then answer u by a standard answer:
Wooden Block said :
No Joke said :
HDB HQ,
My question is assuming that the occupier(Join Singles Scheme) wishes to take over a unit(become the registered tenant of the unit), then what are the conditions for this "permitted occupier" to be qualified as the "registered tenant" for the unit? Please tell me all of the conditions, for eg, he must be a Singaporean.
Why do some "permitted occupier"(already staying at the unit) can not serve as the "registered tenant"(Join Singles Scheme) when the registered tenant quit from the unit? What are the reasons that make them can't serve as "registered tenant"? Please tell me directly all of the reasons that make a "permitted occupier"(already staying in the unit) can't serve as a "registered tenant", for eg, he is a Singapore PR.
The reply from Miss Wendy Zhang was assuming that the unit still applying, that is totally different. I don't know why she wants to assume that the unit is still applying.
I think I would need to keep on asking if the attitude for the reply is so, and then you will also have to keep on busying for the reply. My enquiry is not for you to train new staff, can you ask some experience staff to help if Miss Zhang is a new staff.
Regards
09/12/2009Standard reply - Case By Case basis ! LOL!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No Joke said :
HDB,
My enquiry was:
If your in charge officer do not really do what he/she has to do for the "feedback" or try to help to cover it, then where can the public make a "further complaint " for the case and those staff who are trying to cover it?The reply from your Estates Officer Justina Tan was:
If a member of the public "wishes to feedback" on matters related to HDB's services or staff, he/she can email his/her concern to our Quality Service Manager at [email protected]> or contact them at Tel: 1800-8663063 . HDB will look into the matter. We hope that we have clarified your concerns.What I mean is "the feedback has sent to QSM", but "why your officer likes to assume that the feedback has NOT sent " and some more teach me where to make a feedback? And still hoping that she has clarified my concerns!
Can this kind of reply clarified the concerns?
Did she read the enquiry properly, if she can't read then can somebody else help her?May be I have to repeat the enquiry many times then they can understand actually what I am trying to ask:
If the feedback has sent to QSM HDB, but the officer who in charge of investigating the feedback do not really do what he/she has to do for the feedback or try to help to cover it, then where can the public make a further complaint(complaint the problem for one more time to different place/dept) for the case and those staff who are trying to cover it(including the officer who in charge of investigating the feedback).Regards
10/12/2009