dr lim hock siew speaks for the 1st time post-detention
-
Originally posted by xtreyier:
That piece of commie white washing history revisionist traitorous
shit becomes PM of my homeland?!!! NEVER!!!!
The piece of X-rated Fraud that has the no brainer to be infatuated perpetually with natures waste - will forever be an alarmist to the end.
What else can it be but to plagiarize even the great Shakespeare works and to compete with Julius Caesar for the spotlight in some deluded grandstanding acts of deceit ?
Bravo, and encore to the X-rated pseudo-intellect that defecates each time it put some effort to think.
-
Originally posted by GHoST_18:
stupidity and ignorance knows no limits...
stupidity is an act, ignorance is a bliss -
huh! i go call ISD better
-
i do hope it's good acting...
coz it seemed so real...
-
Originally posted by 4sg:
These are piece of shit from an ignorant fool like you. As I said, don't come here and give us your nonsense. I have been extending you my kindness and patience so far.
My God, in what kindness do i deserve from you, and as patience, it is one gracious, nothing to do with me. Dun get angry hor -
Originally posted by GHoST_18:
i do hope it's good acting...
coz it seemed so real...
Real???
, i bring this to my pub and laugh till midnight... -
Originally posted by angel7030:
History can be change in a matter of second, we as citizens of singapore should create a better environment and future for Singapore next and follow up of our generation, that is our duty, we cannot go back and mingle with all those political faults and bring it to today just to confuse our youngs mind. That is selfish in every sense. If anyone have the guts, the capability to move the masses and prove to be a good leader, pen your name down, join the politic and we will elect you. But if you are going to keep mentioning about old past, there is nothing we can do but just sympathise it.LKY is not worrying that his past actions, right or wrong, will not make his downfall, if so, he will not had released people like Lim. He knows it is a different ball game now, by telling the youngs not to expect a govt change already tell you a story of his stand in this coming election.
Sensible words from you, angel. May more like you exists, instead of that self admitted piece of shit regularly posting her commie white washing trash here. But unlike others, I will not deprive her or anyone of her freedom of expression, but let her run wild with her shit. She digs her own grave very well.
-
Originally posted by xtreyier:
Sensible words from you, angel. May more like you exists, instead of that self admitted piece of shit regularly posting her commie white washing trash here. But unlike others, I will not deprive her or anyone of her freedom of expression, but let her run wild with her shit. She digs her own grave very well.
Oh! I see, thanks.Just wonder if she still has the strength left to dig her own grave.
-
Originally posted by Atobe:
Only the dumbness of a Taiwanese "hum" will want to determine the weight of "integrity" - as it has nothing of any worth to be mentioned about its own integrity.
What if the integrity weights only 0.5 grams - will the Taiwanese "hum" trample on it ?
It will not be a surprise if the Taiwanese "hum" will sell its "hum" for 0.5 grams of gold - as its integrity means littel to the "hum" ?
The answer is obvious considering the lack of integrity in the "hum" to even appreciate what integrity is all about.
Your understanding of the history is as bad as your understanding of the politics of Singapore.
Was Chiang Kai Shek naive to listen to his advisors, or was he simply incompetent to lead those who had believed in him, and with him having no ability to control his ego to defeat Mao - even when Mao was pressed to make the Long March into near oblivion ?
You have no business to associate any of the Singaporean loyalists to be Communist when you have no knowledge of the politics of Singapore during the 1950s, and depend only on the filth that was fed into your "hum" brain.
Mao succeeded as he was able to seize the upper hand in exploiting Chiang's failure to manage his own opportunities by attacking his own corrupted subordinate generals that abuse China's citizens through the barrel of the gun.
Singapore politicians of the 1950s were all similar in spirit as Sun Yat Sen efforts to modernise China and take it away from the clutches of the corrupt Empress that destroyed China single-handedly.
Singapore will similarly be destroyed by LKY's skewed vision and political ambitions that project only the interest of the PAP first and Singaporeans second.
A Taiwanese "hum" will be the cause of internal strife with its continued idiocy to distort the political history as designed by the PAP.
Do we need a Taiwanese "hum" to teach Singaporeans our history when its own knowledg of Taiwanese history is as bad if not worst ?
Talking about intergrity, what kind of intergerity does the Singapore hum, Aturddy, has? The only answer is none whatsoever.
-
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:
Talking about intergrity, what kind of intergerity does the Singapore hum, Aturddy, has? The only answer is none whatsoever.
The piece of self admitted shit is a hum too? Close minded like a cockle, now that you brought it up. But Singaporean? nah, not Singaporean definately. What integrity has a piece of shit has anyway? lololol!!!
I would rather lay my bets on Angel7030, at least she is more honest and straightforward in her replies unlike the despicable piece of self admitted shit.
-
Originally posted by xtreyier:
The piece of self admitted shit is a hum too? Close minded like a cockle, now that you brought it up. But Singaporean? nah, not Singaporean definately. What integrity has a piece of shit has anyway? lololol!!!
I would rather lay my bets on Angel7030, at least she is more honest and straightforward in her replies unlike the despicable piece of self admitted shit.
Honest and not straightforward for that crazy taiwan hum. -
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:
Honest and not straightforward for that crazy taiwan hum. even praising also must come with insult...I GIVE Up, go work liao. Bye bye -
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:
Honest and not straightforward for that crazy taiwan hum.Lol!
No probs. Honesty is a great virtue to have, as compared to the lies and commie white washing by that self admitted piece of shit dishes around here. -
The Progressive Party was heavily backed and made up of English-speaking upper class professionals. Its campaign ideology was to advocate progressive and gradual reforms, rather than sudden, quick, radical ones, which fell in line with British policy at the time, to slowly let Singapore gain full self-government. This approach was criticised vehemently by David Saul Marshall,leader of the Labour Front who instead wanted rapid reform. The locals (especially the Chinese), and the communists also blasted the Progressive Party, claiming that they are Hanjian, or traitors in chinese.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Party_(Singapore)
And who was involved with this reactionary party?
It is our old friend, Harry Lee.
After the war he was educated in England as a lawyer and on his return to Singapore joined the pro-British Progressive Party, for which he acted as an election agent in the 1951 elections...
This reactionary party, who wanted the british to continue to rule Singapore, this was the party that our old friend Harry joined when he came back to Singapore.
Now you all finally understand why I always call Lee Kuan Yew anglo dog, british dog.
He was never on the side of the dialect chinese, this Lee Kuan Yew, WWII worked for Japanese, after WWII joined pro british party.
Came to power suppress dialect.
That is why this bastard is my sworn enemy.
-
The lost history of Lee Kuan Yew
After his education in Britain, Lee Kuan Yew returned to Singapore in 1949 to practise as a lawyer in the law firm Laycock and Ong. He became the honorary legal adviser for several trade unions after being acquainted with their leaders (in 1951) and subsequently caught the public eye in February 1952, when the Postal Workers Union succeeded, with his guidance, in obtaining important concessions from the colonial government.
According to his memoirs and this website, Lee Kuan Yew then proceeded to form the PAP with the help of the communists. Yet these sources conveniently neglect to mention Lee Kuan Yew's involvement in the Singapore Progressive Party in the 1951 legislative elections. In fact, Lee acted as the election agent for his boss John Laycock, helping him to manage his campaign and canvass on his behalf. (See here and here for proof) He had thus entered into politics even before he became involved in the trade unions' dispute with the British. (Polling day for the 1951 legislative elections was on 10 April, we can assume that his political activities with the SPP started months before that)
If I may speculate, LKY joined the SPP initially to build up his political career there. However when the Rendel Constitution expanded the electoral rolls to include all local-born as voters, resulting in a significant increase in Chinese voters, LKY decided to jump ship and formed the PAP in 1954 because he saw that the SPP lacked the support of the Chinese working class. (So the next time LKY condemns politicians who change political parties, you know where he's coming from)
Yet the problem isn't solely that LKY jumped ship and didn't care to tell anyone about his great experience in his memoirs. The bigger problem lies in the fact that LKY supported the SPP despite the fact that it was A) pro-British in both its policies and in its composition of members (mostly English-speaking upper class professionals) B) unsupportive of achieving independence (it merely paid lip-service to the idea by declaring in October 1952, its objective of Singapore achieving independence through a Singapore-Malaya merger without setting a target date)
LKY's miraculous change of heart on these issues when he joined the PAP only demonstrates how the pursuit of power can sometimes make one very flexible about their beliefs. Unfortunately for us, this flexibility of LKY's did not extend to the area of political freedoms.http://us.asiancorrespondent.com/secret-blog/2009/09/is-lee-kuan-yew-more-interested-in.html
Singapore Progressive Party
http://infopedia.nl.sg/articles/SIP_1150_2008-11-30.html
I said many times already, when it comes to Lee Kuan Yew, only some sort of idiotic moron would go and believe in what he says.
Only those political idiots, naive morons; thinking is like a three year old child would actually go and believe in Lee Kuan Yew.
-
that's a direct insult to 66.6% of true singaporean voters. We expect opponents of PAP to be polite with gentlemanship, you can criticise the govt, but not the citizens of Singapore.
In the end, with people like you championing for the opposition, we got no other choice but to elect the opposite, not that the opposition is no good, but they got Fxxk type marketing supporter who can even said citizens are 3 years old only.
-
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:
Talking about intergrity, what kind of intergerity does the Singapore hum, Aturddy, has? The only answer is none whatsoever.
Has the "zwei-siao-Hog" become infatuated with "hum" too ?The pseudo-Bavarian Hog must be on home ground with the turd that it wallows in, and now to endear itself to the sludge that the "hum" leaves behind to the "hog".
Can the "zwei-siao-Hog" be expected to know anything about "integrity" when it has none to help it to stand its own ground in any debate with its nemesis - but can only resort to its verbiage to berate as a piece of "turd" ?
How pathetic that the intelligence of a "zwei-siao-Hog" should be beaten into repeated silence by a mere piece of "turd" that it can only use as a rebuttal towards yours truly ?
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:
Honest and not straightforward for that crazy taiwan hum.Only a "zwei-siao-Hog" will admit to be "honest" and at the same time to be "not straightforward" for that crazy "Taiwan Hum".
If "honest" can only end up as "not straightforward" - what kind of "honesty" can be expected from a "zwei-siao-Hog" ?
Is it any wonder that a "zwei-siao-Hog" can have a dialog with a X-rated Fraud based on a common twisted values on "honesty" and "integrity" ?
-
Originally posted by xtreyier:
Sensible words from you, angel. May more like you exists, instead of that self admitted piece of shit regularly posting her commie white washing trash here. But unlike others, I will not deprive her or anyone of her freedom of expression, but let her run wild with her shit. She digs her own grave very well.
For a pseudo-intellect who has no interests and place no importance in history, it is not a surprise that it will endear itself to a Taiwanese "hum" with "zilch" integrity as the X-rated Fraud.What else is there to be expected from a X-rated Fraud with a passion for nature's waste except to lick up the sludge left by a Taiwanese "hum" ?
Originally posted by xtreyier:The piece of self admitted shit is a hum too? Close minded like a cockle, now that you brought it up. But Singaporean? nah, not Singaporean definately. What integrity has a piece of shit has anyway? lololol!!!
I would rather lay my bets on Angel7030, at least she is more honest and straightforward in her replies unlike the despicable piece of self admitted shit.
Amazing that the infatuation of nature's waste will light up the X-rated Fraud at the slightest mention of the word.
With the proven and exposed dishonesty and deception of the X-rated Fraud it will not be surprise that it does not attempt to all the embarrassing exposures of its failures, but will attempt its strident best to relive its own misguided glory with associates that are no better then its X-rated fraudulent self.
Can a X-rated Fraud be depended to differentiate between honesty and straitforward - when it cannot even tell the difference between the Truth, Half-Truths, and Lies ?
Originally posted by xtreyier:Lol!
No probs. Honesty is a great virtue to have, as compared to the lies and commie white washing by that self admitted piece of shit dishes around here. This must be the understatement of the year - coming from a pseudo-intellect with the values of a X-rated Fraud.
Does a X-rated Fraud know that "honesty" is a great virtue to have ?
For a X-rated Fraud that has been proven for its lack of honesty by plagiarizing the works of others without any qualification and without any shame to pass it as its own, it is amazing that it even knows about the word "virtue" in its vocabulary.
From a dishonest claim that Singapore "will be 80% self sufficient with water" when the report that it depended on merely state "will be possibly 80% self-sufficient" - the X-rated Fraud will dare to encourage Singapore to thumb our nose at the Malaysians who had signed a water agreement valid till 2061.
It is not surprising that the X-rated Fraud will even dare to be strident to the extent of being an alarmist - with its 24 nuclear bombs - to blast its dishonest opinion based on its deliberate lack of diligence to research on a subject that it has no knowledge about, but will make absurd claims to lull Singaporeans to sleep - even as the Kra Canal is being seriously considered by different countries with deep concern to the strategic passage through the Staits of Malacca being closed for any reasons.
Can anything pathetically be more originally forthcoming from a X-rated Fraud - who can only satisfy its own ego with a piece of turd, which its pseudo-intellect cannot even hope to create, but will have to plagiarize it from one who is as "zwei-siao" as the X-rated Fraud, and still the X-rated Fraud will hang on to the plagiarized turd for what its own X-rated life is worth ?
-
Originally posted by angel7030:
that's a direct insult to 66.6% of true singaporean voters. We expect opponents of PAP to be polite with gentlemanship, you can criticise the govt, but not the citizens of Singapore.
In the end, with people like you championing for the opposition, we got no other choice but to elect the opposite, not that the opposition is no good, but they got Fxxk type marketing supporter who can even said citizens are 3 years old only.
Is the Taiwanese "hum" a Singapore Citizen to comment on Singapore Politics ?What does a Taiwanese "hum" know about Singapore Political History when all that it has in the tiny brain of a "hum" is the propaganda digested by others and regurgitated into its brain ?
How did the ignorant Taiwanese "hum" get the magic number "66.6% of Singapore voters" from ?
From the Department of Statistics of Singapore, in 2006 - the ‘Total Population of Singapore was 4,401,400 – from 0 to 65 years and over (July 2006 est)’ (*1)
The total number of votes that the PAP received was 748,130 out of an electoral roll of 2,147,840 citizens - where is that 66.6% of Singaporean Voters ?
The Taiwanese "hum" should learn to keep its filth off this corner when it has nothing else to display except for its daily garbage spilled across each and every thread.
-
Originally posted by angel3070:
The lost history of Lee Kuan Yew
After his education in Britain, Lee Kuan Yew returned to Singapore in 1949 to practise as a lawyer in the law firm Laycock and Ong. He became the honorary legal adviser for several trade unions after being acquainted with their leaders (in 1951) and subsequently caught the public eye in February 1952, when the Postal Workers Union succeeded, with his guidance, in obtaining important concessions from the colonial government.
According to his memoirs and this website, Lee Kuan Yew then proceeded to form the PAP with the help of the communists. Yet these sources conveniently neglect to mention Lee Kuan Yew's involvement in the Singapore Progressive Party in the 1951 legislative elections. In fact, Lee acted as the election agent for his boss John Laycock, helping him to manage his campaign and canvass on his behalf. (See here and here for proof) He had thus entered into politics even before he became involved in the trade unions' dispute with the British. (Polling day for the 1951 legislative elections was on 10 April, we can assume that his political activities with the SPP started months before that)
If I may speculate, LKY joined the SPP initially to build up his political career there. However when the Rendel Constitution expanded the electoral rolls to include all local-born as voters, resulting in a significant increase in Chinese voters, LKY decided to jump ship and formed the PAP in 1954 because he saw that the SPP lacked the support of the Chinese working class. (So the next time LKY condemns politicians who change political parties, you know where he's coming from)
Yet the problem isn't solely that LKY jumped ship and didn't care to tell anyone about his great experience in his memoirs. The bigger problem lies in the fact that LKY supported the SPP despite the fact that it was A) pro-British in both its policies and in its composition of members (mostly English-speaking upper class professionals) B) unsupportive of achieving independence (it merely paid lip-service to the idea by declaring in October 1952, its objective of Singapore achieving independence through a Singapore-Malaya merger without setting a target date)
LKY's miraculous change of heart on these issues when he joined the PAP only demonstrates how the pursuit of power can sometimes make one very flexible about their beliefs. Unfortunately for us, this flexibility of LKY's did not extend to the area of political freedoms.http://us.asiancorrespondent.com/secret-blog/2009/09/is-lee-kuan-yew-more-interested-in.html
Singapore Progressive Party
http://infopedia.nl.sg/articles/SIP_1150_2008-11-30.html
I said many times already, when it comes to Lee Kuan Yew, only some sort of idiotic moron would go and believe in what he says.
Only those political idiots, naive morons; thinking is like a three year old child would actually go and believe in Lee Kuan Yew.
Did LKY's memoirs include the snippet that "after liberation, he went into contracting business, undertook work ranging from house repairing to supplying labourers - and saved enough to leave for Britain in 1946 ?
The post-WW2 face of a "Contractor and Labour supplier" seem to have been etched on the face of a Cambridge trained Lawyer - as seen in a photo taken in 1959.
Photo taken from the thread - ‘yandao Q-ing to vote’ (*1)
As a young Lawyer working in Laycock and Ong, LKY represented locals of various Chinese, Malay, or Indian origins, and represented individuals on criminal charges, as well as Trade Unions for infringing public laws.
Was LKY already planning his political future with his seemingly magnaminous efforts displayed that had him even offering to pay for the lost sum in a Criminal Breach of Trust case involving a Chinese clerk accused of embezzling a sum of $1000+ from its employers ?
On his ascension to political success - the magnamity of a wanna-be politician changed into a Machevillian demon freely imposing draconian laws that include whipping and death by hanging - punishments that date back to the ancient days.
Its insatiable desire to control will continue with increasing penalties for mundane offenses on normal citizens that step out of his harsh laws, as he continue to tighten the laws to make it an illegal act even for an assembly of one to protest in public.