http://www.orientaviation.com/section.php?currenyIssue=I20070125140145-mA6W4¤tSection=latestnews¤tArticle=A20070202130205-W50a2&
MSN Philippines News, 20 Sep 2009
Singaporean boss pilots Australian carrier Rex to profit
Singaporean entrepreneur Lim Kim Hai is the first to admit that glamour
and prestige did not even figure when he made the decision to invest in
a regional Australian airline in 2002.
Seven years after Lim's big gamble on Rex, the domestic carrier born
out of the collapse of Ansett is turning in healthy profits despite the
dismal state of the global aviation industry.
"Glamour doesn't sell very many seats and glamour doesn't produce profits," he
told AFP in an interview in his Singapore office, from where he runs
the airline's headquarters in Sydney largely by remote control.
"If you are in it for the glamour, you will be in big trouble," said
Lim, an engineer by training who serves as the airline's executive
chairman.
Trouble was exactly the word to describe the state of Rex -- short for
Regional Express Holdings -- which lost 35 million Australian dollars
(30 million US) in its first year of operations in 2002 and needed a
further capital injection to stay afloat, he said.
Lim and a Singaporean partner pumped another five to six million
dollars into Rex, well aware of the odds stacked against them and the
high probability of never seeing their money again.
Due to a confidentiality clause, Lim cannot reveal the amount he
initially invested in Rex but says he is currently the biggest
shareholder with a stake of over 20 percent in the publicly listed
carrier.
In the first year of Lim's tenure running Rex, he
turned the loss-making carrier around with a profit of one million
dollars in the year to June 2004 as he initiated new practices to curb
wastage and inefficiencies.
And Rex has never looked back since Lim took
charge, churning out profits every year through to the current fiscal
period ended June with profits down just 5.6 percent to 23 million
dollars.
"Even though our profits were reduced, it's quite comforting in this environment," said Lim.
"Obviously we know how severe the recession is... So being able to
overcome this year of really, really negative impact with relatively
minor damage, I think it is quite satisfactory," he said.
Aviation analyst Peter Harbison said Lim injected a new management
style into Rex, making the carrier a rare success story in a country
where the airline industry has had a list of notable failures.
"He applied a lot of business sense and he brought solid business
discipline," said Harbison, who is with the Sydney-based Centre for
Asia Pacific Aviation consultancy.
Even Lim admits he did not give himself much of a chance in saving the
carrier from the brink of collapse, but said giving up without even
trying was not an option.
"The commonly accepted view at that time was the airline would last only six months," said Lim, who will turn 52 next month.
"We knew the difficulties and the decision to carry on was not so much
not knowing the facts but more of saying here is an airline that is
losing money but it is operationally doing okay.
"The airline was doing about 50,000 flights a year... So on the
operational part of it, things were not broken, but on the
profitability part, it was losing money quite substantially."
With the second round of capital injection coming entirely from him and
his Singaporean partner, Lee Thian Soo, 54, Lim decided it was time for
a fresh perspective on how Rex should be managed.
Lee is a Rex director and has other business interests in Southeast
Asia including a medical equipment supply company and a mobile gaming
firm.
"My business partner and myself agreed we will give it one more try. We
may be foolish but we will try it one more time," Lim said.
"We dug into our pockets and financed it again and since every cent
that is in the company comes from us now, we will do it totally our
way."
The carrier has a fleet of 88 planes comprising mainly Saab 340
34-seaters plying routes in southeastern Australia, connecting the
country's main cities to rural towns.
A one-way ticket is about 130 dollars on average, Lim said.
He says he makes just four trips a year to Sydney for the company's
board meetings and maintains that running Rex from his Singapore office
does not put him at a disadvantage.
"I think with technology today, it's very, very easy," said Lim, who gets up to 300 emails daily from his key management staff.
"We keep each other in the loop. All the time, I am getting information
from everywhere so I am very connected virtually and have a good idea
of what is happening."
Having an engineering background did help him in making the crucial decisions to turn Rex around, said Lim.
Rex's corporate website says Lim started his career as a defence
engineer specialising in underwater warfare before he entered the
corporate world.
"As an engineer, we are trained to think very, very rigorously and
logically," he said. "So this training carries on into the business and
I approach any issue (as) an engineer."
If he had known everything he knows today, Lim admits, he probably
would have had nothing to do with the industry regardless of the
prestige and glamour that comes with owning an airline.
"In hindsight, it was totally stupid and naive. We didn't know how treacherous airlines were," said Lim.
"I certainly wouldn't do it again. It is just too tough."
--------------
Latest @ Singaporenewsalternative.blogspot.com
1. S'porean entrepreneur turns loss-making Australian carrier to profit
2. Auto system entry into M'sia for frequent Singaporean visitors
3. OPINION: Tiny Singapore knows a thing or three about bubbles
4. Temasek Foundation Pledged US$1.15 Million To Fund Vietnam Technical Courses
Latest video added:
1. Singapore F1 2009 Insights
.
Apology, the above url link is incorrect.
This is the correct link:
http://news.ph.msn.com/business/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3598752
for many years, when SIA make tons of money, all diam diam, when SIA dun make so much money...a lots of comments, well, comment is as easy as ABC.
Why not i say with the current lots of SIA gals be replaced by my young, sexy and beautiful gals will do the trick. Can be and could be right?
for many years, when SIA make tons of money, all diam diam, when SIA dun make so much money...a lots of comments, well, comment is as easy as ABC.
with this kind of no brain comments from those against the PAP, the government don't need much to brainwash the citizens.
for many years, when SIA make tons of money, all diam diam, when SIA dun make so much money...a lots of comments, well, comment is as easy as ABC.
with THAT kind of no brain comments from those against the PAP, the government don't need much to brainwash the citizens.
Originally posted by sgdiehard:for many years, when SIA make tons of money, all diam diam, when SIA dun make so much money...a lots of comments, well, comment is as easy as ABC.
with this kind of no brain comments from those against the PAP, the government don't need much to brainwash the citizens.
SIA is a national carrier, it is not any tom or dick carrier ya, and it is an icon of Singapore, if you dun manage it well, god bless you, the last union problem had bring in LKY to stop it, if not SIA will be in deep trouble, so, thus an entrepreneur know how to deal with UNION going for a strike and especially the pilot union??
Singaporeans have gain alots from SIA shares in the earlier years, those who miss it, too bad, with years of experiences, do you think we need a nobody who think that he is somebody to tell us what to do?? Business is always up and down, he is lucky that he is able to rebound by injecting money into his own private business,,..but as a national carrier, where the stake are high, do you think he fit the bill of telling us what to do??
Originally posted by angel7030:
SIA is a national carrier, it is not any tom or dick carrier ya, and it is an icon of Singapore, if you dun manage it well, god bless you, the last union problem had bring in LKY to stop it, if not SIA will be in deep trouble, so, thus an entrepreneur know how to deal with UNION going for a strike and especially the pilot union??
Singaporeans have gain alots from SIA shares in the earlier years, those who miss it, too bad, with years of experiences, do you think we need a nobody who think that he is somebody to tell us what to do?? Business is always up and down, he is lucky that he is able to rebound by injecting money into his own private business,,..but as a national carrier, where the stake are high, do you think he fit the bill of telling us what to do??
no disagreement.
Originally posted by sgdiehard:no disagreement.
huh!! No no no!!! u must disagree with me, if not i cannot survive here, I like disagreement, not agreement ya
what has this guy got to do with running SIA instead?
Originally posted by angel7030:
huh!! No no no!!! u must disagree with me, if not i cannot survive here, I like disagreement, not agreement ya
He agreed with your idea that SIA is not a "tom" but a "dick carrier" for the benefit of a useless and immobile "hum".
Does this not prove everyone's observation that your existence here is simply to spread your flippant ignorance to side track the thread ?
You should learn to be satisfied with SIA's effort in being a successful "dick" carrier for your sake, and stay out of the Singapore debate.