http://www.news.com.au/travel/story/0,28318,26002438-5014090,00.html
News.com.au, 30 Aug 2009
Australians reveal their worst airline
AUSTRALIANS have voted Tiger Airways their least favourite airline, says a new survey.
The Domestic Airline Satisfaction Survey conducted by Choice magazine ranked Tiger lowest, with a 55 per cent satisfaction rate.
Jetstar was rated second-lowest, with a 60 per cent satisfaction rate,
while Virgin Blue was the most satisfactory, at 68 per cent.
Read More
-------------------------------
Latest @ Singapore News Alternative:
1. Tiger Airways Voted The Worst Airline In Australia
2. Smaller crowd expected for second Singapore GP
3. From beer to banks, Singapore Inc. expands across Asia
4. Singapore, Bangkok may be new gold trade centres
5. SIA to fly to Melbourne with A380
6. Stars' citizenship weakens 'Cause'
7. A Global Rice Revolution
Latest videos added:
1. Prostitution in Singapore's Chinatown
2. Peter Schiff's Vlog Report - 28 Aug 2009
.
Interestingly .... from the same article ...
Internationally, Singapore Airlines was rated number one for overall satisfaction, with a 78 per cent rating, followed by Emirates, Air New Zealand and Cathay Pacific.
From the threads this yxxone chap's been posting, he seems to gloat and take delight at anything negative, or protrays our country, in a negative light ...what's his agenda I wonder ....
Please post this piece of news on GCA...
http://G-C-A.sgforums.com tq~! ^_^
Another Yxxxone's mysterious no reply post.
i had to agree la. i had taken airasia, tiger airway, jetstar.
tigerairway is the worse of the budget airline. the seat make you backside pain.
most of the time i took tiger.
I got no complaint, the price u pay is the stuff u get.
that y i only compare to jetstar, airasia and tiger. compare shit with shit ma.
after compare it, tiger still the worse!
I prefer tiger to airasia n jetstar.
It fly to more places in the regions which i go for holiday.
Originally posted by reyes:that y i only compare to jetstar, airasia and tiger. compare shit with shit ma.
after compare it, tiger still the worse!
oh, u mean tiger shit is worst of all animals..hmmm..good for my pure biology essay on the animal kingdom. Hope i get good marks!!
Worst or good dun make any differences, the poor Aussies got no money to take even their own Qantas, not to mention SIA and BA. Like it or not, they still take Tigerairline, in the end, it all voice down to dollars and cents. For survey, sure they vote you the lowest among all others...damn, you asked the aussie to wait at their airport for days..before you can fly, what you expect, sure lowest lah
Of course the ang mos are in a disadvantage when coming to sitting at budget airlines, damn, the seat is so small and the legs space is so short that most ang mos guy would have to squeeze their balls, and the ang mos gals would have to adjust their fatty huge backside..I think budget airline are designed for Asian, for ang mos, it is just an extra, sure they complain here and there, but in the end, the first objective of budget airlines is targetting on poor or thrifty Asians like Reyes to fly or so called Now you can Fly brand.
Like me, i fly SQ, help our nation ya...especially if you are SIA shareholders
aiyah.. wat to do... u pay for what u deserve.
aiyah.. wat to do... u pay for what u deserve.
include higher prone to jet crashes.?
best is 68%, worst is 55%....13% difference.... Not like the best airline is miles ahead or tiger airways is miles behind.... feels a bit close loh...
it probably translate to higher the ticket price, the better the satisfaction
Fuck sakes - is this lionnoisy's other personality? It's just as fucked up.
Originally posted by Kenashi:most of the time i took tiger.
I got no complaint, the price u pay is the stuff u get.
air asia cheaper than tiger!
check the pricing details!!
tiger charges double the airport tax and u leave from budget terminal.
but i only monitor bkk tix.
Originally posted by reyes:include higher prone to jet crashes.?
i don't know why people have this mentality that cheap = less safe
there is a standard maintenance procedure for all aircraft no matter how cheap
the only difference is how each airline company chooses to add in their own kiasee layers of safety nets but the minimum requirement stated by the manufacturer must be maintained
Originally posted by Fatum:Interestingly .... from the same article ...
Internationally, Singapore Airlines was rated number one for overall satisfaction, with a 78 per cent rating, followed by Emirates, Air New Zealand and Cathay Pacific.
From the threads this yxxone chap's been posting, he seems to gloat and take delight at anything negative, or protrays our country, in a negative light ...what's his agenda I wonder ....
From the posts that angel7030 n the likes of PAP bootlickers has been postings,they seem to gloat and take delight at anything positive,or portrait our country,in a positive light....What's their agenda,i wonder....
Originally posted by Howlheje:From the posts that angel7030 n the likes of PAP bootlickers has been postings,they seem to gloat and take delight at anything positive,or portrait our country,in a positive light....What's their agenda,i wonder....
the agenda is simple..."Let there be Peace"
Originally posted by kopiosatu:air asia cheaper than tiger!
check the pricing details!!
tiger charges double the airport tax and u leave from budget terminal.
but i only monitor bkk tix.
u go senna airport at JB and take Air Asia to BKK more cheaper lor.
Originally posted by angel7030:
the agenda is simple..."Let there be Peace"
Don't bullshit, your agenda is not simple.
Actually, it is better you go concentrate on how to bring in more business to your pub than come here disrupt discussions.
Originally posted by Chew Bakar:Another Yxxxone's mysterious no reply post.
I thought we all used to it liao haha!