seeing singapore from another perspective
-
Originally posted by skythewood:
i heard that one from the 5th element, the movie with the pretty girl...
Most of the stuff on American movies like to take quotes from famous philosophers. Sigmund Freud, Nietzsche, Mark Twain..etc.I would have thought you were familar enough with his tactics to try to play his games.
-
ok. it is unclear to you. whatever.
Why don't you rephrase it in a clearer way?
-
Originally posted by Ah Chia:
Why don't you rephrase it in a clearer way?
because i am lazy to bother with you. you can twist it to fit your use bah. yup, so weird logic it is.
-
I would have thought you were familar enough with his tactics to try to play his games.
What tactics?
-
because i am lazy to bother with you.
But others won't be clear of what you are saying.
They might misinterpret it if you make it unclear.
Well, at least we can be sure that what ever opposition that managed hold itself together despite the disadvantage of being challengers instead of incumbent, it will be a strong opposition.
-
Originally posted by Stevenson101:
Most of the stuff on American movies like to take quotes from famous philosophers. Sigmund Freud, Nietzsche, Mark Twain..etc.I would have thought you were familar enough with his tactics to try to play his games.
i was bored, so i want to see how far this can go. Maybe if he lived in the time of the philosophers, he will challenge them all day.
"what doesn't kill you makes you stronger? This is not clear. By your logic, If SDP have a sex scandal, it will get stronger? Is SDP strong or weak? This is not clear."
-
Originally posted by Ah Chia:
because i am lazy to bother with you.
But others won't be clear of what you are saying.
They might misinterpret it if you make it unclear.
Well, at least we can be sure that what ever opposition that managed hold itself together despite the disadvantage of being challengers instead of incumbent, it will be a strong opposition.
yah, i am sure they will misinterpret. happens all the time. yeah, right.
-
he will challenge them all day.
If you made it clear, I wouldn't have the grounds to challenge you.
Well, at least we can be sure that what ever opposition that managed hold itself together despite the disadvantage of being challengers instead of incumbent, it will be a strong opposition.
-
Originally posted by Ah Chia:
he will challenge them all day.
If you made it clear, I wouldn't have the grounds to challenge you.
Well, at least we can be sure that what ever opposition that managed hold itself together despite the disadvantage of being challengers instead of incumbent, it will be a strong opposition.
yeah sure, challenge me. i not stopping you. yeah sure, go ahead.
-
Well, at least we can be sure that what ever opposition that managed hold itself together despite the disadvantage of being challengers instead of incumbent, it will be a strong opposition.
http://www.thereformparty.net/
For the sake of Singapore's future, I hope that your logic is correct.
-
Originally posted by Ah Chia:
If we follow your logic, SDP should be strong correct?
what ever opposition that managed hold itself together despite the disadvantage of being challengers instead of incumbent, it will be a strong opposition.
Err... you missed out the last sentence... Skythewood posted this;
Well, at least we can be sure that what ever opposition that managed hold itself together despite the disadvantage of being challengers instead of incumbent, it will be a strong opposition, not some losers who get pwned and cry foul all day.
Isn't the stand very clear on SDP?
-
Isn't the stand very clear on SDP?
No.
This was his main point:
Well, at least we can be sure that what ever opposition that managed hold itself together despite the disadvantage of being challengers instead of incumbent, it will be a strong opposition
-
ok, maybe just not clear to you. Understood.
It's quite clear to me leh... when I think of what CSJ has done... and compared it to the red text...
And I don't think SDP managed to hold itself together... Not considered as having successfully done that...
-
They cry foul, but I don't see them as losers.
-
Not considered as having successfully done that...
Why?
-
1) Losers cry foul when pwned instead of thinking of ways to fight back. So...
2) SDP is politically rather unstable, unlike WP. The next possible hope we have now is RP, with JBJ's son at it's helm. Hopefully he can work some magic.
-
SDP is politically rather unstable, unlike WP.
SDP unstable in what way?
WP stable in what way?
-
Losers cry foul when pwned instead of thinking of ways to fight back.
Got fight back wah, through internet propaganda. Cry foul is one of the ways.
-
-.-"
Ask so many questions....
Why don't you tell me SDP stable in what way?
WP unstable in what way?
-
Third WP candidate from GE 2006 resigns from party
http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/03/third-wp-candidate-from-ge-2006-resigns-from-party/
-
And I don't think SDP managed to hold itself together... Not considered as having successfully done that...
Ask so many questions....
You made the statement, so I ask.
-
Yes, but there's another recent report I hv read which states that WP got new qualified members as well, and is in the process of renewal. The article is in some other sgforums thread.
-
Originally posted by Ah Chia:
And I don't think SDP managed to hold itself together... Not considered as having successfully done that...
Ask so many questions....
You made the statement, so I ask.
You are challenging the opinion, and I'm asking you why first.
And anyway... slowly one by one:
Besides this trial, a number of SDP members, their supporters and activists are facing successive trials, mostly involving illegal assemblies and processions. One such trial is the Tak Boleh Tahan protest in front of the Parliament House on 15 Mar 08 organised to highlight the escalating cost of living in Singapore.http://yoursdp.org/index.php/news/singapore/1853-another-trial-commences
You never know if PAP will disband them sooner or later, or whether they will be disbanded when PAP successfully jailed most of their members, given that SDP members are dumb enough to give PAP the excuses to do so.
-
I think SDP is stable.
I don't hear any inter party conflicts from them.
-
Political unstability can be also due to being dumb enough to commit political suicide.