Originally posted by Gensis:
Huh??? You see no reason for him to lie. So that's why you would believe him wholeheartedly and fervently, defending his actions and displaying your displeasure of the admin just because of his case?You tell me if that's logical.
So what other circumstances do you base your feel on? You give the impression that you are basing merely on the actions (as reported by da-vid without any proof.
No, not wholeheartedly. But just that so far, I see no reason why he would lie. But I am open to your input about this.
Again I did not defend his actions or whatever, please don't misunderstand. You can continue to say whatever you want about David although hopefully other than saying he is me. Would you want me to clarify regarding that remark about closure of thread?
About being logical, like I said I think there's a misunderstanding somewhere.
I am not about to go into specific examples, maybe not now. But what I feel towards admin is not based on this thread alone or anything within just this year alone.
She has so often been so readily to close certain threads when she doesn't want people to continue to discussing in that thread, or when queries are answered, yet at other times she deliberately leaves a thread open so that people in support of her or her agenda can continue to lamblast a specific individual in the thread. Whether or not that person is in the right or wrong, whether the person's complaints are valid or not, whether it helps anyone if the thread is kept open.
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:No, not wholeheartedly. But just that so far, I see no reason why he would lie. But I am open to your input about this.
Again I did not defend his actions or whatever, please don't misunderstand. You can continue to say whatever you want about David although hopefully other than saying he is me. Would you want me to clarify regarding that remark about closure of thread?
About being logical, like I said I think there's a misunderstanding somewhere.
I am not about to go into specific examples, maybe not now. But what I feel towards admin is not based on this thread alone or anything within just this year alone.
She has so often been so readily to close certain threads when she doesn't want people to continue to discussing in that thread, or when queries are answered, yet at other times she deliberately leaves a thread open so that people in support of her or her agenda can continue to lamblast a specific individual in the thread. Whether or not that person is in the right or wrong, whether the person's complaints are valid or not, whether it helps anyone if the thread is kept open.
da-vid/urself would most likely lie, due to his ego
u are defending his actions, its clear
you do not have any specific examples to begin with, and yet your next para is full of statements that readily point out she does
irony at its best
Originally posted by laurence82:da-vid, yes you have multiple split personality disorder
Yes, you are demanding things of the admin, even though you do not pay a single cent or contribute in any way to sgforums
No, dont have a limb
Others have commented fairly, but i have never seen thick-skinned people like yourself who demand admins to do things your way, and you dont even pay a single cent or contribute to sgforums
David and I are different people, this is fact, this is reality.
If you say David was making demands, yes.
If you say me, no. But I did mention things about the admin which you obviously oppose.
You get what I mean.
Have I demanded anything? All I have done is mention what I've seen.
I have my own reasons for not paying to sgforums, of which standard of admin/moderating is not among the cheif reasons.
Originally posted by laurence82:da-vid/urself would most likely lie, due to his ego
u are defending his actions, its clear
you do not have any specific examples to begin with, and yet your next para is full of statements that readily point out she does
irony at its best
Last post was directed to Gensis. Least you could do was not change the meaning of what I was saying or intentionally misread me.
Looks like I'll be staying off 4chan this early morning <.<
Better trolling here in this thread anyway
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:David and I are different people, this is fact, this is reality.
If you say David was making demands, yes.
If you say me, no. But I did mention things about the admin which you obviously oppose.
You get what I mean.
Have I demanded anything? All I have done is mention what I've seen.
I have my own reasons for not paying to sgforums, of which standard of admin/moderating is not among the cheif reasons.
da-vid, you are making demands of admins, no way is admin is obliged to do anything you say
if you dont pay, good, you dont have any good reason to begin with to make demands of admins
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:Last post was directed to Gensis. Least you could do was not change the meaning of what I was saying or intentionally misread me.
My post was directed at u, anyway you do not understand unanimity, so i will repeat till u understand
Originally posted by laurence82:da-vid, you are making demands of admins, no way is admin is obliged to do anything you say
if you dont pay, good, you dont have any good reason to begin with to make demands of admins
Direct your post to David yourself, don't have to quote me.
Originally posted by laurence82:My post was directed at u, anyway you do not understand unanimity, so i will repeat till u understand
Yes, I know it was directed to me, but I wasn't seeking your reply. Moreover, you changed the meaning of what I intended to say. Can't comment if you're talking about something I never quite meant.
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:Direct your post to David yourself, don't have to quote me.
Its directed to u/da-vid, so i dont see any difference
Originally posted by laurence82:Its directed to u/da-vid, so i dont see any difference
Like I said you're mistaken.
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:Yes, I know it was directed to me, but I wasn't seeking your reply. Moreover, you changed the meaning of what I intended to say. Can't comment if you're talking about something I never quite meant.
Who cares if you see my reply, as if you seek any reply here anyway
Trolls like you dont seek replies, only response, only u will understand this
I have not intended to change the meaning, and you cant comment because you dont have valid points like i pointed out repeatedly
Originally posted by laurence82:Who cares if you see my reply, as if you seek any reply here anyway
Trolls like you dont seek replies, only response, only u will understand this
I have not intended to change the meaning, and you cant comment because you dont have valid points like i pointed out repeatedly
Irony.
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:Like I said you're mistaken.
i dont see any reason why it is
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:Irony.
Unanimity
Laurence, you really want to bring this in a different direction don't you?
In any case;
It is amazing how threads and topics about friends of the admin can get deleted or shifted quickly, yet such things involving personal info does not get acted upon promptly even after notification via open forum.
And the admin can even add sarcastic remarks and all.
This double standard is amazing and shows how arbitary the role of admin is within sgforums.
It does not matter whether you like him or not, whether the person is your friend or not, but policy should be applied uniformly and not so based on a whim or your fancies.
And usually once objective is met, complaint is settled or whatever, thread is closed as "case closed" or whatever. Yet in this case topic is allowed to continue.
Oversight? Or just arbitary judgement to allow people to lamblast somebody who has said negative things about sgforums, be it he is right or wrong about his comments.
Originally posted by laurence82:i dont see any reason why it is
Truth is you are mistaken. Maybe you are pretending to be mistaken, I won't know for sure.
wah u all still going on... so free ah... why I so busy one :(
And in that time, I finished doing an analysis on straits times index, posted it on my blog, brushed teeth, and nowI going to sleep liao. Need to wake at 7
Relax and go sleep too ok?
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:Laurence, you really want to bring this in a different direction don't you?
In any case;
It is amazing how threads and topics about friends of the admin can get deleted or shifted quickly, yet such things involving personal info does not get acted upon promptly even after notification via open forum.
And the admin can even add sarcastic remarks and all.
This double standard is amazing and shows how arbitary the role of admin is within sgforums.
It does not matter whether you like him or not, whether the person is your friend or not, but policy should be applied uniformly and not so based on a whim or your fancies.
And usually once objective is met, complaint is settled or whatever, thread is closed as "case closed" or whatever. Yet in this case topic is allowed to continue.
Oversight? Or just arbitary judgement to allow people to lamblast somebody who has said negative things about sgforums, be it he is right or wrong about his comments.
Same direction, i made my stand, but you dont have any rebuttal, except for thats ''your opinions'' or ''you want to bring this to a different direction''
Originally posted by laurence82:Unanimity
So you've always agreed with FireIce's manner of moderating? Have you always been of one mind with her?
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:Truth is you are mistaken. Maybe you are pretending to be mistaken, I won't know for sure.
Precisement, i wasnt mistaken in the first place, glad you know that
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:So you've always agreed with FireIce's manner of moderating? Have you always been of one mind with her?
That this is how u try to bring topic to different direction
my stand is, mods/admins are not obliged to be subservient to users, and they have acted fairly in this case
i dont know what personal feud you have with fireice, but please bring it elsewhere and do not use such opportunity to settle your score with her
disgusting behaviour realli
Originally posted by eagle:wah u all still going on... so free ah... why I so busy one :(
And in that time, I finished doing an analysis on straits times index, posted it on my blog, brushed teeth, and nowI going to sleep liao. Need to wake at 7
Relax and go sleep too ok?
finished a conference call with US and watching é”女18號 on utube
and of cuz having time pwning uneducated ruffians
Originally posted by laurence82:Same direction, i made my stand, but you dont have any rebuttal, except for thats ''your opinions'' or ''you want to bring this to a different direction''
I know your stand, I understand your stand but doesn't mean I will accept it or take it for my own.
This isn't a debate laurence, in which case it doesn't matter how much personal attacks you carry out on me. I'm not interested in your rebutting me, and it doesn't really matter if I rebutt you. Things are just what they are.
And before you use that last line to insist I am David, again let me clarify, simple truth is that David and I are different people.
Originally posted by laurence82:Precisement, i wasnt mistaken in the first place, glad you know that
I know you are mistaken. Maybe being mistaken on purpose, but I won't know for sure.