Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:How is that showing support for David?
How is that not showing support for da-vid's case?
Note, you only mentioned "this case". Any other cases you saw or experienced before?
Yet in this case topic is allowed to continue.
Why so concerned about this particular case only?
No other forumers had any such complains.
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:Post was intended for Gensis.
Read my post on unanimously
Just like how you unanimously root for youself, da-vid
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:Repeated because that was all that I initially wanted to bring up. This whole thing has drawn out because it has been drawn in a different direction.
Clearly evading questions.
Let me repeat to you the 3 questions.
1) Any reasons why you are so agitated or in your words, amazed, when it does not concern you at all?
2) Any reasons why you believe da-vid that it was indeed not acted upon promptly even after notification?
3) Are you very sure it wasn't acted promptly?
Such obvious support for someone unrelated?
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:Repeated because that was all that I initially wanted to bring up. This whole thing has drawn out because it has been drawn in a different direction.
The direction has not changed. Your points were refuted, and your only ruse was to go into ''thats your opinions'' thing, which as the ruse used by da-vid (aka yourself)
Originally posted by laurence82:da-vid, stop it lar
heehee
Irony.
Originally posted by laurence82:Somebody, stop it lar
heehee
Irony.
Originally posted by laurence82:The direction has not changed. Your points were refuted, and your only ruse was to go into ''thats your opinions'' thing, which as the ruse used by da-vid (aka yourself)
Again irony.
Admin attitude is one of that being objective, and not obliged to provide a service, since this is not a paid-for forums
Admin has acted promptly....when they do log in
da-vid aka somebodyinsg has wronged the admins
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:Irony.
Unanimous
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:Irony.
Unanimous
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:Again irony.
Unanimous
Originally posted by Gensis:
Clearly evading questions.Let me repeat to you the 3 questions.
1) Any reasons why you are so agitated or in your words, amazed, when it does not concern you at all?
2) Any reasons why you believe da-vid that it was indeed not acted upon promptly even after notification?
3) Are you very sure it wasn't acted promptly?
Such obvious support for someone unrelated?
1) I'm not agitated, at least maybe to the extent you think it is. And no, I'm not overly agitated because it has happened to David or anything. It could have been anyone else. The point wasn't about David.
I believe we seem to have different notions about this 'support for David' thing.
Yes, I have seen mod/admin act more promptly when it was other issues.
If you must know, I am basing the time of removal on when David mentioned himself that his contact number was removed.
It could have been David, it could have been anyone else.
My point was never about David.
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:1) I'm not agitated, at least maybe to the extent you think it is. And no, I'm not overly agitated because it has happened to David or anything. It could have been anyone else. The point wasn't about David.
I believe we seem to have different notions about this 'support for David' thing.
Yes, I have seen mod/admin act more promptly when it was other issues.
If you must know, I am basing the time of removal on when David mentioned himself that his contact number was removed.
It could have been David, it could have been anyone else.
My point was never about David.
so you are agitated, because you are da-vid
same notion
admins are not obliged to remove, lest remove promptly
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:1) I'm not agitated, at least maybe to the extent you think it is. And no, I'm not overly agitated because it has happened to David or anything. It could have been anyone else. The point wasn't about David.
I believe we seem to have different notions about this 'support for David' thing.
Yes, I have seen mod/admin act more promptly when it was other issues.
If you must know, I am basing the time of removal on when David mentioned himself that his contact number was removed.
It could have been David, it could have been anyone else.
My point was never about David.
Irony
I am basing the time of removal on when David mentioned himself that his contact number was removed
Yet
My point was never about David.
And the excuse
It could have been David, it could have been anyone else.
And yet
Yes, I have seen mod/admin act more promptly when it was other issues.
When else have you seen the mod/admin not act promptly, given your short time frame here?
And why do you believe da-vid so fervently that you blamed the mod/admin immediately?
if u guys notice one thing, da-vid and somebodyinsg have the same characteristics in the sense, despite all the overwhelming facts and rebuttal, they are unwavering in repeated the same thing, or even intentionally act blur
i must say, many forumers are here for long, they can see thru this ruse
Originally posted by laurence82:Admin attitude is one of that being objective, and not obliged to provide a service, since this is not a paid-for forums
Admin has acted promptly....when they do log in
da-vid aka somebodyinsg has wronged the admins
You have said what you feel about Admins, I have said what I feel about Admins.
Doesnt seem like logging in was the issue behind the promptness.
David and Somebodyinsg are two different people, I understand you are trying to defend your friend being 'wronged'. But if you're looking for me to say sorry or correct something, I won't be. Not that I think it matters to you anyway.
Also, not like anyone needs any convincing, people like you will still continue to support admin be it admin is in the right or wrong.
Still debating, alamak.
The persons who can modify or delete the thread are the moderators, owner of that forum, FireIce, queen of the sgforums and Jason, king of the sgforums.
If none of them is willing to modify or delete the thread, the thread will always be there.
So, if TS really wants the thread to be modified or deleted, please apologise and ask politely and sincerely, the moderators, owner of that forum, FireIce, queen of the sgforums or Jason, king of the sgforums will surely grant your request.
OK ?
Originally posted by Gensis:Irony
Yet
And the excuse
And yet
When else have you seen the mod/admin not act promptly, given your short time frame here?
And why do you believe da-vid so fervently that you blamed the mod/admin immediately?
I'm not cursing, swearing or throwing insults at anyone am I?
On one hand I see no reason for David to lie, but if you feel he was lying about the promptness of action, or you can give me an inclination of some sort. In fact, I'll take your word for it regarding the timing in which it was removed?
Also, I am not basing what I feel about the admin on this thread alone.
But please do understand you have misunderstood me, if you would like I can try to clarify.
Originally posted by laurence82:if u guys notice one thing, da-vid and somebodyinsg have the same characteristics in the sense, despite all the overwhelming facts and rebuttal, they are unwavering in repeated the same thing, or even intentionally act blur
i must say, many forumers are here for long, they can see thru this ruse
Despite whatever you say, the truth is the truth. David and I are different people.
And yes, forumers can see for themselves. Not everyone has the same attitude as you towards the mod.
But it doesn't really matter, end of the day, people like you will still support the admin. This was never a campaign about proving you right or me wrong.
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:You have said what you feel about Admins, I have said what I feel about Admins.
Doesnt seem like logging in was the issue behind the promptness.
David and Somebodyinsg are two different people, I understand you are trying to defend your friend being 'wronged'. But if you're looking for me to say sorry or correct something, I won't be. Not that I think it matters to you anyway.
Also, not like anyone needs any convincing, people like you will still continue to support admin be it admin is in the right or wrong.
Its not hweeling, its the fact, this is reality
Only crybabies demand admins to be subservient or succumb to their demands
I dont have to defend my friends being wronged, all of them are right. Only you da-vid aka somebodyinsg are trying to wrong the admin
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:I'm not cursing, swearing or throwing insults at anyone am I?
On one hand I see no reason for David to lie, but if you feel he was lying about the promptness of action, or you can give me an inclination of some sort. In fact, I'll take your word for it regarding the timing in which it was removed?
Also, I am not basing what I feel about the admin on this thread alone.
But please do understand you have misunderstood me, if you would like I can try to clarify.
Again, why so defensive about insulting anybody, da-vid?
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:I'm not cursing, swearing or throwing insults at anyone am I?
On one hand I see no reason for David to lie, but if you feel he was lying about the promptness of action, or you can give me an inclination of some sort. In fact, I'll take your word for it regarding the timing in which it was removed?
Also, I am not basing what I feel about the admin on this thread alone.
But please do understand you have misunderstood me, if you would like I can try to clarify.
Huh??? You see no reason for him to lie. So that's why you would believe him wholeheartedly and fervently, defending his actions and displaying your displeasure of the admin just because of his case?
You tell me if that's logical.
Also, I am not basing what I feel about the admin on this thread alone.
So what other circumstances do you base your feel on? You give the impression that you are basing merely on the actions (as reported by da-vid without any proof.
Originally posted by Gensis:
Huh??? You see no reason for him to lie. So that's why you would believe him wholeheartedly and fervently, defending his actions and displaying your displeasure of the admin just because of his case?You tell me if that's logical.
So what other circumstances do you base your feel on? You give the impression that you are basing merely on the actions (as reported by da-vid without any proof.
Let me answer the last pt
Because he is d a - v i d
Hehe
Originally posted by laurence82:Its not hweeling, its the fact, this is reality
Only crybabies demand admins to be subservient or succumb to their demands
I dont have to defend my friends being wronged, all of them are right. Only you da-vid aka somebodyinsg are trying to wrong the admin
David and I are different people, this is fact, this is reality. I do think you are intentionally saying we are the same people, but this part I may be wrong.
I am not demanding anything, merely mentioning certain things that do happen or have happened.
You are going out on a limb here aren't you?
You know very well I'm not the first or only person ever to comment on admin's style of moderating. Have you always agreed with her manner of moderating?
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:David and I are different people, this is fact, this is reality. I do think you are intentionally saying we are the same people, but this part I may be wrong.
I am not demanding anything, merely mentioning certain things that do happen or have happened.
You are going out on a limb here aren't you?
You know very well I'm not the first or only person ever to comment on admin's style of moderating. Have you always agreed with her manner of moderating?
da-vid, yes you have multiple split personality disorder
Yes, you are demanding things of the admin, even though you do not pay a single cent or contribute in any way to sgforums
No, dont have a limb
Others have commented fairly, but i have never seen thick-skinned people like yourself who demand admins to do things your way, and you dont even pay a single cent or contribute to sgforums