SGForums fucking sucks
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Truth is I did not insult or be rude to anybody here in this topic.
Again, why so defensive? No one said anything yet
Only da-vid yourself like to harp on insult
Oh god, stop revealing yourself further, we know you are da-vid
-
Look, you are really bringing this in a different direction altogether, and I think that is your true aim all along. Whether or not you believe I am David, and it is very likely you are doing it on purpose in any case.
It is amazing how threads and topics about friends of the admin can get deleted or shifted quickly, yet such things involving personal info does not get acted upon promptly even after notification via open forum.
And the admin can even add sarcastic remarks and all.
This double standard is amazing and shows how arbitary the role of admin is within sgforums.
It does not matter whether you like him or not, whether the person is your friend or not, but policy should be applied uniformly and not so based on a whim or your fancies.
And usually once objective is met, complaint is settled or whatever, thread is closed as "case closed" or whatever. Yet in this case topic is allowed to continue.
Oversight? Or just arbitary judgement to allow people to lamblast somebody who has said negative things about sgforums, be it he is right or wrong about his comments.
-
Originally posted by Gensis:
The fact that you are going on and on and on for someone 'unrelated'.See, you just can't stop replying to this thread
Seriously, when did I go on and on for david? In what way?
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Look, you are really bringing this in a different direction altogether, and I think that is your true aim all along. Whether or not you believe I am David, and it is very likely you are doing it on purpose in any case.
It is amazing how threads and topics about friends of the admin can get deleted or shifted quickly, yet such things involving personal info does not get acted upon promptly even after notification via open forum.
And the admin can even add sarcastic remarks and all.
This double standard is amazing and shows how arbitary the role of admin is within sgforums.
It does not matter whether you like him or not, whether the person is your friend or not, but policy should be applied uniformly and not so based on a whim or your fancies.
And usually once objective is met, complaint is settled or whatever, thread is closed as "case closed" or whatever. Yet in this case topic is allowed to continue.
Oversight? Or just arbitary judgement to allow people to lamblast somebody who has said negative things about sgforums, be it he is right or wrong about his comments.
Its your aim to confuse everyone by using ''thats your opinion'' ruse. da-vid used it repeatedly before, so everyone already know, and for the nth time, yes i believe you are da-vid intentionally
Omg, how easy this is
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
Again, why so defensive? No one said anything yet
Only da-vid yourself like to harp on insult
Oh god, stop revealing yourself further, we know you are da-vid
You are doing it again arent you?
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
Its your aim to confuse everyone by using ''thats your opinion'' ruse. da-vid used it repeatedly before, so everyone already know, and for the nth time, yes i believe you are da-vid intentionally
Omg, how easy this is
You are doing it again arent you?
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Seriously, when did I go on and on for david? In what way?
In my opinion, you are rooting for yourself, da-vid
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
You are doing it again arent you?
Yes, you are trying to confuse people again.
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
In my opinion, you are rooting for yourself, da-vid
I was asking Gensis.
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
Yes, you are trying to confuse people again.
Irony.
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
I was asking Gensis.
I was replying for him, in fact, everyone else here except for clone like you, can answer for everyone else
We are of same mind what da-vid has done, what you have done
For the nth time, duh
-
Originally posted by Kenashi:
your 100+ words are just repeating the same thing, no point wasting my time reading.hahaaBring up this post on da-vid
just repeating the same thing
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Irony.
Not ironic ah
I think you should search your conscience and stop living in this sinful life
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Seriously, when did I go on and on for david? In what way?
Are you dumb?And usually once objective is met, complaint is settled or whatever, thread is closed as "case closed" or whatever. Yet in this case topic is allowed to continue.
What strong support you are showing for his case.
I'm sure 'he' will be very touched that you are so concerned that his case or topic is allowed to continue.
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
I was replying for him, in fact, everyone else here except for clone like you, can answer for everyone else
We are of same mind what da-vid has done, what you have done
For the nth time, duh
Irony.
-
Originally posted by eagle:
Bring up this post on da-vid
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Irony.
da-vid likes to repeat
Anyway, righ term/phrase to use is ''of same mind'' or ''unanimously''
-
hey da-vid, solve this one for all. if there is 2 of you, then just meet up and talk. but if we see only 1, we know why
ohhh wait maybe he can get his friend to impersonate -
It is amazing how threads and topics about friends of the admin can get deleted or shifted quickly, yet such things involving personal info does not get acted upon promptly even after notification via open forum.
Repeated how many times liao.
Really strong support for da-vid. Any reasons why you are so agitated or in your words, amazed, when it does not concern you at all?Any reasons why you believe da-vid that it was indeed not acted upon promptly even after notification? Are you very sure it wasn't acted promptly? Wow!
-
Originally posted by Gensis:
Are you dumb?What strong support you are showing for his case.
I'm sure 'he' will be very touched that you are so concerned that his case or topic is allowed to continue.
How is that showing support for David?
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
How is that showing support for David?
I am sure you know, you just ignoring it intentionally, da-vid
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
da-vid likes to repeat
Anyway, righ term/phrase to use is ''of same mind'' or ''unanimously''
Irony.
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
I am sure you know, you just ignoring it intentionally, da-vid
Post was intended for Gensis.
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Irony.
da-vid, stop it lar
heehee
-
Originally posted by Gensis:
Repeated how many times liao.
Really strong support for da-vid. Any reasons why you are so agitated or in your words, amazed, when it does not concern you at all?Any reasons why you believe da-vid that it was indeed not acted upon promptly even after notification? Are you very sure it wasn't acted promptly? Wow!
Repeated because that was all that I initially wanted to bring up. This whole thing has drawn out because it has been drawn in a different direction.
Firstly, admin's attitude towards it.
Secondly, for the not acting promptly, please check back yourself.