SGForums fucking sucks
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
You just did it again blatantly, where you are the one actually trying to confuse things.
Ha ha. Good joke. Irony.
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
The justice thing was the side discussion with you where you brought up the word.
It was not a side discussion, this is the main thing, as everyone already pointed out why they are still here, or why the topic is still here, where you are the one who fault admins for not being objective etc
Hence this is the reason why i said you divert the direction away
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
I didnt want to make a long discussion of it, but I think you misunderstood something so tried to clear it up. Whether it was me not being specific or you misreading (either intentionally or unintentionally).
As for that stand you want me to make, I think my earlier posts are ok enough even if you try to confuse it.
I didnt want to make a long discussion of it, but I think you misunderstood something so tried to clear it up. Whether it was me not being specific or you misreading intentionally
As for that stand I want you to make, I think your earlier posts are ok enough to say you are trying to confuse everyone
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Ha ha. Good joke. Irony.
Please treat this discussion seriously
You are trying to clown around, da-vid
Sigh
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Not once did I say I support him or whatever, please read my comments properly to establish what I was saying.
I read through your comments very properly. I still see that you are supporting him.As I have already told you, I will leave you to figure out what you have gotten yourself into.
Maybe it would be better to sign up another nick to continue posting to support yourself as well. Good idea right?
-
Gensis is right
Two would make it obvious you are a clone
You need minimum 5 user IDs
Please also let FireIce know your intention
-
Originally posted by Gensis:
I read through your comments very properly. I still see that you are supporting him.As I have already told you, I will leave you to figure out what you have gotten yourself into.
Maybe it would be better to sign up another nick to continue posting to support yourself as well. Good idea right?
Again let me just clarify, David is David, I am me and I am not David.
Could I really just ask you why you feel I am supporting David?
Is it merely because I am not pro-admin or pro-moderator?
Do note that I have not dissed you in any way.
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
Please treat this discussion seriously
You are trying to clown around, da-vid
Sigh
Irony.
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
I dont know about me, but i know you are repeatedly doing this in topic alone
Earning credits too fast too furious man
To just make it simple what I have wanted to say in this topic;
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:It is amazing how threads and topics about friends of the admin can get deleted or shifted quickly, yet such things involving personal info does not get acted upon promptly even after notification via open forum.
And the admin can even add sarcastic remarks and all.
This double standard is amazing and shows how arbitary the role of admin is within sgforums.
It does not matter whether you like him or not, whether the person is your friend or not, but policy should be applied uniformly and not so based on a whim or your fancies.
And usually once objective is met, complaint is settled or whatever, thread is closed as "case closed" or whatever. Yet in this case topic is allowed to continue.
Oversight? Or just arbitary judgement to allow people to lamblast somebody who has said negative things about sgforums, be it he is right or wrong about his comments.
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
credit for revealing you are da-vid is ok de lar
thanks, da-vid
Oei
I was the first one to reveal hor. He give credit wrongly liao
Originally posted by laurence82:I dont know about me, but i know you are repeatedly doing this in topic alone
Earning credits too fast too furious man
Suspicious right?
Let's see. da-vid comes in crap crap crap non-stop, then declare he's leaving the thread. Then suddenly out pops SomebodyInSG and supports da-vid's stand. Never mind that. Even more suspicious, he goes on and on and on like da-vid to crap and crap about the same thing again and again.
If not related, I see no point continuing like this. Either he's damn dumb and stupid and super free with nothing better to do at all, or he's da-vid
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
Somebody, nope i am not
You dont care to make a stand, you want people to read your repeated posts of ''thats your opinion, not mine''
So, you are changing your own meaning for those who couldnt care to track
I have not changed anything, unlike you. Again for what I intended to say, my initial postings were enough. I do not need to change anything, neither do I need you to reinvent what I meant to say.
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Again let me just clarify, David is David, I am me and I am not David.
Could I really just ask you why you feel I am supporting David?
Is it merely because I am not pro-admin or pro-moderator?
Do note that I have not dissed you in any way.
da-vid, you could see it in your posts why you supporting da-vid, for more information, refer to your posts, and also posts of other forumers who could see it right away
Diss me? I dont know
-
Originally posted by Gensis:
Oei
I was the first one to reveal hor. He give credit wrongly liao
Suspicious right?
Let's see. da-vid comes in crap crap crap non-stop, then declare he's leaving the thread. Then suddenly out pops SomebodyInSG and supports da-vid's stand. Never mind that. Even more suspicious, he goes on and on and on like da-vid to crap and crap about the same thing again and again.
If not related, I see no point continuing like this. Either he's damn dumb and stupid and super free with nothing better to do at all, or he's da-vid
Ok ok gib u credit
hurhur
-
Originally posted by Gensis:
Oei
I was the first one to reveal hor. He give credit wrongly liao
Suspicious right?
Let's see. da-vid comes in crap crap crap non-stop, then declare he's leaving the thread. Then suddenly out pops SomebodyInSG and supports da-vid's stand. Never mind that. Even more suspicious, he goes on and on and on like da-vid to crap and crap about the same thing again and again.
If not related, I see no point continuing like this. Either he's damn dumb and stupid and super free with nothing better to do at all, or he's da-vid
About me supporting his stand, please read my last post.
I believe I have never at any point started insulting you or anything.
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
I have not changed anything, unlike you. Again for what I intended to say, my initial postings were enough. I do not need to change anything, neither do I need you to reinvent what I meant to say.
I have not changed anything, unlike you. Again for what I intended to say, my further postings reinforced what i want to say. I do not need to change anything, neither do I need you to reinvent what I meant to say.
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
da-vid, you could see it in your posts why you supporting da-vid, for more information, refer to your posts, and also posts of other forumers who could see it right away
Diss me? I dont know
Erm.... I didnt mention "diss" in any post to you did I? Just to clarify.
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
About me supporting his stand, please read my last post.
I believe I have never at any point started insulting you or anything.
Why so defensive? I dont think he said you insulted him or anything
Also, why you bring ''insult'' into this topic? thats what da-vid repeatedly did
hohoho!!!!!
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Again let me just clarify, David is David, I am me and I am not David.
Could I really just ask you why you feel I am supporting David?
Is it merely because I am not pro-admin or pro-moderator?
Do note that I have not dissed you in any way.
The fact that you are going on and on and on for someone 'unrelated'.See, you just can't stop replying to this thread
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Erm.... I didnt mention "diss" in any post to you did I? Just to clarify.
Yes, the post i quoted
Err, why are you being pwned like da-vid??
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
I have not changed anything, unlike you. Again for what I intended to say, my further postings reinforced what i want to say. I do not need to change anything, neither do I need you to reinvent what I meant to say.
I never reinvented what you meant to say.
And yes, you have changed the meaning of what I have intended to say, be it knowingly or unknowingly.
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
Yes, the post i quoted
Err, why are you being pwned like da-vid??
Hence I asked you for clarification, no need to be like that Laurence.
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
I never reinvented what you meant to say.
And yes, you have changed the meaning of what I have intended to say, be it knowingly or unknowingly.
I dont reinvent what you meant to say.
And yes, you have changed the meaning of what I have intended to say knowingly
*Irony with correction on grammar
Just like da-vid like to say ''more smarter'', somebodyinsg like to say ''never reinvented''
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
Why so defensive? I dont think he said you insulted him or anything
Also, why you bring ''insult'' into this topic? thats what da-vid repeatedly did
hohoho!!!!!
Truth is I did not insult or be rude to anybody here in this topic.
-
Originally posted by Gensis:
The fact that you are going on and on and on for someone 'unrelated'.See, you just can't stop replying to this thread
Hurhurhur, revealing himself further as he argues more and more
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Hence I asked you for clarification, no need to be like that Laurence.
Hence dont need to make a repetive, obvious dumb post, no need to be like that, da-vid