SGForums fucking sucks
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Again that ironic last line.
Other than that, please read my other posts.
You have no other posts worthy to read again, i dont see how am i to read repeated posts of ''thats your opinion, not mine'' again
Any fresh lines?
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Laurence, really you should know better. But like I have said earlier, maybe you are just doing this intentionally.
I know you are trying to confuse everyone, i am doing it intentionally
I see no other way how i could do it oops-a-daisy accidentally
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
Which post of mine have i insisted that i am correct?
Of course i am for the idea that you are clone. You can change the ID but you cant change the way you argue
And yes i am doing intentionally, i am not sure how i can do it accidentally
Hmm
You are purposely changing the meaning of what I am saying arent you?
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
You have no other posts worthy to read again, i dont see how am i to read repeated posts of ''thats your opinion, not mine'' again
Any fresh lines?
I have already made my statements. You are just trying to draw this out into something else.
For what my initial points were in this thread, please refer to previous postings.
They are clear enough.
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
You are purposely changing the meaning of what I am saying arent you?
da-vid, nope i am not
You dont care to make a stand, you want people to read your repeated posts of ''thats your opinion, not mine''
So, you are changing your own meaning for those who couldnt care to track
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
I have already made my statements. You are just trying to draw this out into something else.
For what my initial points were in this thread, please refer to previous postings.
They are clear enough.
What statements?
Who is trying to draw everyone else into the line of da-vid/somebodyinsg is correct and everyone else has just their opinions?
So i made my points clear enough
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
I know you are trying to confuse everyone, i am doing it intentionally
I see no other way how i could do it oops-a-daisy accidentally
Again that ironic line.
What I have meant to say, the earlier posts are clear enough.
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
Somebody, nope i am not
You dont care to make a stand, you want people to read your repeated posts of ''thats your opinion, not mine''
So, you are changing your own meaning for those who couldnt care to track
I have not changed anything, unlike you. Again for what I intended to say, my initial postings were enough.
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Again that ironic line.
What I have meant to say, the earlier posts are clear enough.
da-vid, you did not make a stand at all, just like we no longer know Bush is fighting against terrorism or fighting for the oil.
Hope this clears up
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
I have not changed anything, unlike you. Again for what I intended to say, my initial postings were enough.
i have not changed anything, unlike you, again for what i intended to say, that you did not make a stand, my other postings are clear enough
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
What statements?
Who is trying to draw everyone else into the line of da-vid/somebodyinsg is correct and everyone else has just their opinions?
So i made my points clear enough
David is David.
I am me.
To clarify, you have your own opinion on what justice is. I will leave it at that.
Other than that, earlier postings have already stated what I wanted to.
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
da-vid, you did not make a stand at all, just like we no longer know Bush is fighting against terrorism or fighting for the oil.
Hope this clears up
Laurence, I really feel you are intentionally calling me David when you know I am not.
If not, then maybe I really have given you too much credit.
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
i have not changed anything, unlike you, again for what i intended to say, that you did not make a stand, my other postings are clear enough
You know yourself what you are trying to do laurence, it isnt the first time you have tried or done this to anybody else.
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
David is David.
I am me.
To clarify, you have your own opinion on what justice is. I will leave it at that.
Other than that, earlier postings have already stated what I wanted to.
da-vid, of course i know you are you
what does justice got to do with you and what earlier postings you have stated?
-
It is amazing how threads and topics about friends of the admin can get deleted or shifted quickly, yet such things involving personal info does not get acted upon promptly even after notification via open forum.
And the admin can even add sarcastic remarks and all.
This double standard is amazing and shows how arbitary the role of admin is within sgforums.
It does not matter whether you like him or not, whether the person is your friend or not, but policy should be applied uniformly and not so based on a whim or your fancies.
And usually once objective is met, complaint is settled or whatever, thread is closed as "case closed" or whatever. Yet in this case topic is allowed to continue.
Oversight? Or just arbitary judgement to allow people to lamblast somebody who has said negative things about sgforums, be it he is right or wrong about his comments.
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
Laurence, I really feel you are intentionally calling me David when you know I am not.
If not, then maybe I really have given you too much credit.
credit for revealing you are da-vid is ok de lar
thanks, da-vid
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
da-vid, of course i know you are you
what does justice got to do with you and what earlier postings you have stated?
The justice thing was the side discussion with you where you brought up the word.
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
You know yourself what you are trying to do laurence, it isnt the first time you have tried or done this to anybody else.
You know yourself what you are trying to do da-vid, it isnt the first time you have tried or done this to anybody else
i mean, you have repeatedly doing this in this topic and you have done it to everyone else in this topic
sigh
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
credit for revealing you are da-vid is ok de lar
thanks, da-vid
You just did it again blatantly, where you are the one actually trying to confuse things.
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
It is amazing how threads and topics about friends of the admin can get deleted or shifted quickly, yet such things involving personal info does not get acted upon promptly even after notification via open forum.
And the admin can even add sarcastic remarks and all.
This double standard is amazing and shows how arbitary the role of admin is within sgforums.
It does not matter whether you like him or not, whether the person is your friend or not, but policy should be applied uniformly and not so based on a whim or your fancies.
And usually once objective is met, complaint is settled or whatever, thread is closed as "case closed" or whatever. Yet in this case topic is allowed to continue.
Oversight? Or just arbitary judgement to allow people to lamblast somebody who has said negative things about sgforums, be it he is right or wrong about his comments.
This part i have refuted, and your responses were ''that is your opinion'' etc etc to divert the direction away
Please make a stand, da-vid
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
You know yourself what you are trying to do da-vid, it isnt the first time you have tried or done this to anybody else
i mean, you have repeatedly doing this in this topic and you have done it to everyone else in this topic
sigh
You know it yourself laurence, this isnt the first time insgforums, be it in this thread or in this year that you have done this.
Irony.
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
You just did it again blatantly, where you are the one actually trying to confuse things.
You just did it again blatantly, where you are the one actually trying to confuse things.
-
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:
You know it yourself laurence, this isnt the first time insgforums, be it in this thread or in this year that you have done this.
Irony.
I dont know about me, but i know you are repeatedly doing this in topic alone
Earning credits too fast too furious man
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
This part i have refuted, and your responses were ''that is your opinion'' etc etc to divert the direction away
Please make a stand, Somebody
I didnt want to make a long discussion of it, but I think you misunderstood something so tried to clear it up. Whether it was me not being specific or you misreading (either intentionally or unintentionally).
As for that stand you want me to make, I think my earlier posts are ok enough even if you try to confuse it.