SGForums fucking sucks

• laurence82

  14 Sep 09, 14:19

  Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:

  It does not matter whether you like him or not, whether the person is your friend or not, but policy should be applied uniformly and not so based on a whim or your fancies.

  
  there is no policy that state that any policy is to be applied uniformly and not based on fancies

  besides, moderators have acted fairly, so i dont see the problem

  the analogy about what moderators is not obliged to be commanded by users is real and practical

• laurence82

  14 Sep 09, 14:20

  Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:

  And usually once objective is met, complaint is settled or whatever, thread is closed as "case closed" or whatever. Yet in this case topic is allowed to continue.

  Oversight? Or just arbitary judgement to allow people to lamblast somebody who has said negative things about sgforums, be it he is right or wrong about his comments.

  
  not oversight, just a base for us to lambast the TS in name of justice

  let us all learn this lesson well

• Gensis

  14 Sep 09, 14:24

  Originally posted by laurence82:

  
  there is no policy that state that any policy is to be applied uniformly and not based on fancies

  besides, moderators have acted fairly, so i dont see the problem

  the analogy about what moderators is not obliged to be commanded by users is real and practical

  
  A forum is a meeting place for informal discussions, to make friends, etc.

  Lousy piece of clone character da-vid and SomebodyInSG are both trying to say the same thing; that moderators are obliged to be fair?????

   

  I guess they have no idea that this is not a forum for immature kids, nor do moderators have the obligation to be fair. It is not a business, nor are moderators paid. This is not customer service. With or without immature kids like them, this forum will still be running around unperturbed.

• SomebodyInSG

  14 Sep 09, 16:48

  Originally posted by laurence82:

  
  So, it is right moderators are not obliged or required by rules to help, i agree.

  Its relevant to da-vid, not to your reply.

  I dont know about anyone being a friend, yes, it is personal, seeing as to how da-vid like to fuck around and call us retard.

  Same direction, i dont see any difference.

   

  
  Your reply or comments about David's attitude or tone is a different thing altogether, I choose not to comment on that.

• SomebodyInSG

  14 Sep 09, 16:50

  Originally posted by aHGer^83:

  yes. case close. n we r already doing our own chatting. wad has the chatting gotta do with u or TS? tink u n/or TS are taking it personally.

  
  Then just taking it as I'm making my own comments then, no different from you in that aspect. Just different viewpoint.

  I'm just saying there is double standard with regards to closing or thread.

• laurence82

  14 Sep 09, 16:51

  Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:

  
  Your reply or comments about David's attitude or tone is a different thing altogether, I choose not to comment on that.

  
  Nope, it justifies the method of communication/responses the users and moderators should adopt on him.

• SomebodyInSG

  14 Sep 09, 16:51

  Originally posted by Fantagf:

  tsk tsk tsk, after reading i can only say 狗改�了�屎

  It is just the culture here, wahahahahha!

  
  Whether it is existing culture or not, and whether it is right or wrong, and whether or not it will actually change are different things.

• Fantagf

  14 Sep 09, 16:52

  Originally posted by Gensis:

  
  A forum is a meeting place for informal discussions, to make friends, etc.

  Lousy piece of clone character da-vid and SomebodyInSG are both trying to say the same thing; that moderators are obliged to be fair?????

   

  I guess they have no idea that this is not a forum for immature kids, nor do moderators have the obligation to be fair. It is not a business, nor are moderators paid. This is not customer service. With or without immature kids like them, this forum will still be running around unperturbed.

  
  Clap clap, well said!  So I suppose you will expect more shit base on what you said.  hahahahah!  good!   

  Come here watch movie, hahahah!   

• Fantagf

  14 Sep 09, 16:53

  Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:

  
  Whether it is existing culture or not, and whether it is right or wrong, and whether or not it will actually change are different things.

  
  I don't understand you

• SomebodyInSG

  14 Sep 09, 16:54

  Originally posted by laurence82:

  
  Nope, it justifies the method of communication/responses the users and moderators should adopt on him.

  
  That's what you feel, anyway like I said, you and other user's response to his attitude or tone is another issue.

• SomebodyInSG

  14 Sep 09, 16:57

  Originally posted by laurence82:

  
  there is no policy that state that any policy is to be applied uniformly and not based on fancies

  besides, moderators have acted fairly, so i dont see the problem

  the analogy about what moderators is not obliged to be commanded by users is real and practical

  
  I understand you see there's nothing wrong in moderating or administering based on mood, fancies and whim. That's up to you, not really going to discuss with you whether that is right or wrong.

  Moderators acting fairly? Again maybe a different viewpoint and perspective. I guess we can both keep our own.

  It has nothing to do about commanding anyone or whatever.

• SomebodyInSG

  14 Sep 09, 16:58

  Originally posted by laurence82:

  
  not oversight, just a base for us to lambast the TS in name of justice

  let us all learn this lesson well

  
  Justice I feel is a very emotionally based thing sometimes, but that's a different discussion.

  Meanwhile, thanks for confirming it is not an oversight.

• SomebodyInSG

  14 Sep 09, 16:59

  Originally posted by Fantagf:

  
  I don't understand you

  
  It's ok.

• Gensis

  14 Sep 09, 17:00

  Originally posted by Fantagf:

  
  Clap clap, well said!  So I suppose you will expect more shit base on what you said.  hahahahah!  good!   

  Come here watch movie, hahahah!   

  
  Not possible. Nothing I said has anything sufficiently wrong or weak for him to counter.

• SomebodyInSG

  14 Sep 09, 17:04

  Originally posted by Gensis:

  
  A forum is a meeting place for informal discussions, to make friends, etc.

  Lousy piece of clone character da-vid and SomebodyInSG are both trying to say the same thing; that moderators are obliged to be fair?????

   

  I guess they have no idea that this is not a forum for immature kids, nor do moderators have the obligation to be fair. It is not a business, nor are moderators paid. This is not customer service. With or without immature kids like them, this forum will still be running around unperturbed.

  David and I are different people, but your comments are funny in the sense that it's ironic and contradicting. I'll leave it to yourself to figure out why. If you don't, it doesn't matter as well. At least not to me.

  I'm not treating this like customer service, at least not they way you guys seem to think so. Don't get misled by earlier comments by others. I don't even treat customer service like that in the first place, unlike others who think that customer service deserves to get abused and abusing them is their right.

  Neither do I expect comments here to really change anything, be it by me or yourself or anyone else. More than anything, it has more to do with other factors. Never did I say I expect things to change or this forum would crash if certain changes were not made, so while I see you feel strongly about your words and what you said to me, sadly it's just not applicable.

  Good day.

• Gensis

  14 Sep 09, 17:06

  Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:

  
  I understand you see there's nothing wrong in moderating or administering based on mood, fancies and whim. That's up to you, not really going to discuss with you whether that is right or wrong.

  Moderators acting fairly? Again maybe a different viewpoint and perspective. I guess we can both keep our own.

  It has nothing to do about commanding anyone or whatever.

  
  Nothing to dow ith commanding anyone or whatever?

   

   

  Therefore, this forum sucks. A moderator, please give me a fucking response

   

  The moderators are obligated to help me, idiot

   

   

   

   

• Gensis

  14 Sep 09, 17:12

  Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:

  David and I are different people, but your comments are funny in the sense that it's ironic and contradicting. I'll leave it to yourself to figure out why. If you don't, it doesn't matter as well. At least not to me.

  I'm not treating this like customer service, at least not they way you guys seem to think so. Don't get misled by earlier comments by others. I don't even treat customer service like that in the first place, unlike others who think that customer service deserves to get abused and abusing them is their right.

  Neither do I expect comments here to really change anything, be it by me or yourself or anyone else. More than anything, it has more to do with other factors. Never did I say I expect things to change or this forum would crash if certain changes were not made, so while I see you feel strongly about your words and what you said to me, sadly it's just not applicable.

  Good day.

  
  Look at it this way. You are giving support to a forumer who uses the following sentences

   

   

   

  1) Therefore, this forum sucks. A moderator, please give me a fucking response already

  2) Wow, you just confirmed my suspicion that this forum sucks.

  3) The moderators are obligated to help me, idiot.

  4) And I'm quite confident that if I sue SGForums for allowing me to be constantly harassed by phone calls due to the fact that they refused to remove my phone number from their website even after I asked nicely twice, I would win.

  5) Alright, so you're just being a troll. Sorry, it's quite hard to differentiate between trolls and actual retards on this forum.

  6) And this site is fucking stupid. When I'm attempting to deal with a stupid website or person, I'm going to be an ass.

   

  So suits you. I will leave you to figure out what you have gotten yourself into.

• laurence82

  14 Sep 09, 17:36

  Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:

  
  That's what you feel, anyway like I said, you and other user's response to his attitude or tone is another issue.

  So are your sentiment that moderators are unfair or not objective.

  *shrugs*

• laurence82

  14 Sep 09, 17:37

  Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:

  
  I understand you see there's nothing wrong in moderating or administering based on mood, fancies and whim. That's up to you, not really going to discuss with you whether that is right or wrong.

  Moderators acting fairly? Again maybe a different viewpoint and perspective. I guess we can both keep our own.

  It has nothing to do about commanding anyone or whatever.

  
  I see you dont have any stand on this matter.

• laurence82

  14 Sep 09, 17:38

  Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:

  
  Justice I feel is a very emotionally based thing sometimes, but that's a different discussion.

  Meanwhile, thanks for confirming it is not an oversight.

  
  Thanks for confirming that moderators have acted fairly and objectively in this matter.

• laurence82

  14 Sep 09, 17:40

  err, anyone, what is somebodyinsg's points again, since everything is their opinion our opinion thingie?

  he is trying to bamboozle everyone but glad to see nobody is convinced by his tomfoolery

   

• aHGer^83

  14 Sep 09, 20:13

  Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:

  
  Then just taking it as I'm making my own comments then, no different from you in that aspect. Just different viewpoint.

  I'm just saying there is double standard with regards to closing or thread.

  me making my own comments? haha~
  i just enjoy talking to myself. hor?

  "hannor hannor"

  ppl jealous i talk to myself..how ah?

  "let him/her/it be lor.... hack care"

  hannor hannor.. u tink i care meh....

  

  

  

  

  

• aHGer^83

  14 Sep 09, 20:16

  Originally posted by laurence82:

  err, anyone, what is somebodyinsg's points again, since everything is their opinion our opinion thingie?

  he is trying to bamboozle everyone but glad to see nobody is convinced by his tomfoolery

   

  somebodyinsg's point is dat he already proven he is da-vid. dat's all.

  

• SomebodyInSG

  14 Sep 09, 20:22

  Originally posted by Gensis:

  
  Nothing to dow ith commanding anyone or whatever?

   

   

   

  That was what David said, not me. I'm not here to support him or whatever.

   

   

   

   

   

   

• SomebodyInSG

  14 Sep 09, 20:23

  Originally posted by Gensis:

  
  Look at it this way. You are giving support to a forumer who uses the following sentences

   

   

   

  1) Therefore, this forum sucks. A moderator, please give me a fucking response already

  2) Wow, you just confirmed my suspicion that this forum sucks.

  3) The moderators are obligated to help me, idiot.

  4) And I'm quite confident that if I sue SGForums for allowing me to be constantly harassed by phone calls due to the fact that they refused to remove my phone number from their website even after I asked nicely twice, I would win.

  5) Alright, so you're just being a troll. Sorry, it's quite hard to differentiate between trolls and actual retards on this forum.

  6) And this site is fucking stupid. When I'm attempting to deal with a stupid website or person, I'm going to be an ass.

   

  So suits you. I will leave you to figure out what you have gotten yourself into.

  Not once did I say I support him or whatever, please read my comments properly to establish what I was saying.